Report: First Chrysler EV Won’t Be the Airflow

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

With the Chrysler Airflow debuting during the CES expo in 2022, practically everyone assumed it would be the brand’s first all-electric model. The concept looked more like a prototype than some fantastical model intended for production decades down the road and even came with a limited spec sheet offering figures that seemed to exist within the confines of reality.

But it’s not the vehicle the brand intends to lead with. Stellantis’ chief design officer, Ralph Gilles, has confirmed that Chrysler’s new CEO, Chris Feuell, wanted something completely different that would differentiate the brand from everything else on the market.


“Chris came at it with her perspective which we really enjoyed," Gilles told MotorTrend. "She wanted a statement that had literally zero to do with anything that you have seen today, even the Airflow concept car. It is evolving in a new direction."


From MotorTrend:


"Airflow was a great exercise to signal again the type of vehicle Chrysler might want to do," Gilles says. As a compelling crossover it was a great starting point. But under Feuell's new direction, the team aimed to beat their own design. The result: it is one of the designs Gilles is most excited about—and that is saying something from the man behind the Dodge Charger Daytona SRT EV muscle car and the Ram Revolution electric pickup truck concepts.
Chrysler's large crossover concept did well at customer clinics in Los Angeles earlier this year. "So, we know we have a hit on our hands," Feuell says. Gilles goes further. "It blew the doors off. That's a good sign. And Chrysler is ripe for that. We've done it before, we've been able to give the brand new, exciting product, so we're pretty stoked about it."

The company still seems to be focused on leading with an all-electric crossover. But it will be using the STLA Large platform intended primarily for electric vehicles, rather than the RU architecture the Airflow was based on. Though it remains likely that plenty of design aspects will carry over, considering how well-received the concept happened to be.


Feuell reportedly asked the vehicle replacing the Airflow to be more modern and boast a tech-forward design. That means adopting and then highlighting the latest features available to the industry. But it doesn’t offer a real sense of what the vehicle might look like. Considering the industry’s current obsession with connectivity, some inclusions could likewise yield mixed opinions.

Not everyone is enamored with all-electric vehicles, touchscreen-based interfaces, and rampant connectivity features that effectively make your automobile a rolling smartphone. In fact, there seems to be a growing segment of the population that’s becoming resentful of “smart features” and designs focused on “mobility” that fail to stress the fundamentals of what makes a good car.


Still, Chrysler wants to be on the bleeding edge of what Stellantis is doing on the North American market — helping to rationalize its continued existence — without becoming a super-premium brand with MSRPs that’ll scare away regular customers. It’s going to be a difficult path. But one that could yield dividends should the brand pull off a successful transition to EVs.

The good news is that Fuell reportedly wants any new tech to be unobtrusive. All systems should be managed with no more than a button press or two. Hopefully, that means there will be a good number of physical controls on the Airflow’s replacement and nothing within the infotainment system that requires you to run through a series of menu screens.


The only concrete information we have on the prospective model is that it will be offered with 400- and 800-volt systems for fast charging. There will also naturally be standard and long-range variants, with the latter allegedly yielding up to 400 miles of driving range between charges. Beyond that, the only other detail the new CEO provided was that it wouldn’t supplant the Chrysler 300 or use its name.

"I don't think it's quite right for this product,” she said. “It could be a great name for something that we bring out in the future. There is so much wonderful history and equity with the name so I wouldn't want to rule it out for potential future use, but not for this one.”


While dealers have already seen the new model, the public isn’t supposed to lay eyes on it until its formal debut sometime in 2024. Chrysler will have a lot riding on it, as that will also be the time when the entire lineup goes away and it’s left with the Pacifica and whatever forthcoming EVs it has on deck.

[Images: Stellantis]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 20 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on May 22, 2023

    I like the Airflow concept a lot - oh, well.


    Another problem Chrysler faces: They can't produce a product that belongs under a different Stellantis brand. A small electric truck would be great... but that's for RAM to do, for instance.


    @Matt P: Agreed, everything seems to be riding on this effort at Chrysler.

  • Flipper35 Flipper35 on May 22, 2023

    I can't standthe UI in the Model 3. Give me a Lucid Air interior over Tesla any day. A tablet in place of a button/knob console and instrumented dash is a deal breaker for me. The Pacifica is a nice blend of buttons and tech. The Bolt looks like a decent compromise also.

    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on May 22, 2023

      UI is an area where Hyundai/Kia/Genesis are beating Tesla.

  • Tassos Obsolete relic is NOT a used car.It might have attracted some buyers in ITS DAY, 1985, 40 years ago, but NOT today, unless you are a damned fool.
  • Stan Reither Jr. Part throttle efficiency was mentioned earlier in a postThis type of reciprocating engine opens the door to achieve(slightly) variable stroke which would provide variable mechanical compression ratio adjustments for high vacuum (light load) or boost(power) conditions IMO
  • Joe65688619 Keep in mind some of these suppliers are not just supplying parts, but assembled components (easy example is transmissions). But there are far more, and the more they are electronically connected and integrated with rest of the platform the more complex to design, engineer, and manufacture. Most contract manufacturers don't make a lot of money in the design and engineering space because their customers to that. Commodity components can be sourced anywhere, but there are only a handful of contract manufacturers (usually diversified companies that build all kinds of stuff for other brands) can engineer and build the more complex components, especially with electronics. Every single new car I've purchased in the last few years has had some sort of electronic component issue: Infinti (battery drain caused by software bug and poorly grounded wires), Acura (radio hiss, pops, burps, dash and infotainment screens occasionally throw errors and the ignition must be killed to reboot them, voice nav, whether using the car's system or CarPlay can't seem to make up its mind as to which speakers to use and how loud, even using the same app on the same trip - I almost jumped in my seat once), GMC drivetrain EMF causing a whine in the speakers that even when "off" that phased with engine RPM), Nissan (didn't have issues until 120K miles, but occassionally blew fuses for interior components - likely not a manufacturing defect other than a short developed somewhere, but on a high-mileage car that was mechanically sound was too expensive to fix (a lot of trial and error and tracing connections = labor costs). What I suspect will happen is that only the largest commodity suppliers that can really leverage their supply chain will remain, and for the more complex components (think bumper assemblies or the electronics for them supporting all kinds of sensors) will likley consolidate to a handful of manufacturers who may eventually specialize in what they produce. This is part of the reason why seemingly minor crashes cost so much - an auto brand does nst have the parts on hand to replace an integrated sensor , nor the expertice as they never built them, but bought them). And their suppliers, in attempt to cut costs, build them in way that is cheap to manufacture (not necessarily poorly bulit) but difficult to replace without swapping entire assemblies or units).I've love to see an article on repair costs and how those are impacting insurance rates. You almost need gap insurance now because of how quickly cars depreciate yet remain expensive to fix (orders more to originally build, in some cases). No way I would buy a CyberTruck - don't want one, but if I did, this would stop me. And it's not just EVs.
  • Joe65688619 I agree there should be more sedans, but recognize the trend. There's still a market for performance oriented-drivers. IMHO a low budget sedan will always be outsold by a low budget SUV. But a sports sedan, or a well executed mid-level sedan (the Accord and Camry) work. Smaller market for large sedans except I think for an older population. What I'm hoping to see is some consolidation across brands - the TLX for example is not selling well, but if it was offered only in the up-level configurations it would not be competing with it's Honda sibling. I know that makes the market smaller and niche, but that was the original purpose of the "luxury" brands - badge-engineering an existing platform at a relatively lower cost than a different car and sell it with a higher margin for buyers willing and able to pay for them. Also creates some "brand cachet." But smart buyers know that simple badging and slightly better interiors are usually not worth the cost. Put the innovative tech in the higher-end brands first, differentiate they drivetrain so it's "better" (the RDX sells well for Acura, same motor and tranmission, added turbo which makes a notable difference compared to the CRV). The sedan in many Western European countries is the "family car" as opposed to micro and compact crossovers (which still sell big, but can usually seat no more than a compact sedan).
  • Jonathan IMO the hatchback sedans like the Audi A5 Sportback, the Kia Stinger, and the already gone Buick Sportback are the answer to SUVs. The A5 and the AWD version of the Stinger being the better overall option IMO. I drive the A5, and love the depth and size of the trunk space as well as the low lift over. I've yet to find anything I need to carry that I can't, although I admit I don't carry things like drywall, building materials, etc. However, add in the fun to drive handling characteristics, there's almost no SUV that compares.
Next