Toyota Previews Builds for SEMA 2023

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

The announcements from auto manufacturers about what they’ve in the pipeline for this year’s SEMA Show in Las Vegas continue apace, with Toyota promising a quartet of builds – plus a few packages that consumers will be able to actually buy.


Shown above is a rendering of the Tacoma X-Runner Concept. Those of you with decent memories will recall the brand had a variant of this sort for a few years in the past, one which featured a lowered suspension, manual gearbox, rear-wheel drive, and a limited-slip diff. This time around, reports tell us there will be a 3.4-liter twin-turbo under the hood, taken from a Tundra and making the better part of 400 horses, along with what certainly looks like a reprise of the low-n-wide theme but applied to a next-gen Tacoma. The concept is a collab between Toyota’s Calty Design Center and its Tech Center in Michigan, suggesting this won’t be a half-baked concept with engine parts made out of cardboard.


Also on tap are an FJ Bruiser, a ‘Blue Beetle’ Tacoma, and a Retro Cruiser. We’ll have to wait until the press conference on October 31 to learn about the appearance of those machines, though we have a good image in our mind’s eye about that FJ. Whether any portion of these concepts reaches even a sniff of actual production is up for some debate. 


What will make it into catalogs, however, is a TRD Performance package for the Tundra, bringing a measure of that arm’s design to a truck that already has a choice of faces depending on trim. The roster currently includes a TRD Sport option which adds styling addenda inside and out; scuttlebutt on the sewers that are fan forums are suggesting this package will include a remap of the ECU for more power, requiring the use of premium fuel.


Look for the Toyota showcase inside the Las Vegas Convention Center to also include displays of a GR Cup Series GR86 racer, 45th-anniversary GR Supra, Trueno Special Edition GR86, plus various and sundry show builds laden with official Associated Accessory Products (AAP) in an effort to showcase offerings at that part of the company.


[Image: Toyota]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 10 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Oct 30, 2023

    Toyota doesn't make a regular cab truck anymore.

  • JMII JMII on Oct 30, 2023

    I wish the sport truck scene would come back. I'm sick of all these lifted bro-dozers, off roader editions and overlanders. And yes back in the day I owned a Ranger Splash stepside complete with yellow and orange graphics 😎

    • See 2 previous
    • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Kwik_Shift_Pro4X on Oct 31, 2023

      Image sells. Like Land Rover with alleged reliability issues, but still see them around.


  • Dartdude Having the queen of nothing as the head of Dodge is a recipe for disaster. She hasn't done anything with Chrysler for 4 years, May as well fold up Chrysler and Dodge.
  • Pau65792686 I think there is a need for more sedans. Some people would rather drive a car over SUV’s or CUV’s. If Honda and Toyota can do it why not American brands. We need more affordable sedans.
  • Tassos Obsolete relic is NOT a used car.It might have attracted some buyers in ITS DAY, 1985, 40 years ago, but NOT today, unless you are a damned fool.
  • Stan Reither Jr. Part throttle efficiency was mentioned earlier in a postThis type of reciprocating engine opens the door to achieve(slightly) variable stroke which would provide variable mechanical compression ratio adjustments for high vacuum (light load) or boost(power) conditions IMO
  • Joe65688619 Keep in mind some of these suppliers are not just supplying parts, but assembled components (easy example is transmissions). But there are far more, and the more they are electronically connected and integrated with rest of the platform the more complex to design, engineer, and manufacture. Most contract manufacturers don't make a lot of money in the design and engineering space because their customers to that. Commodity components can be sourced anywhere, but there are only a handful of contract manufacturers (usually diversified companies that build all kinds of stuff for other brands) can engineer and build the more complex components, especially with electronics. Every single new car I've purchased in the last few years has had some sort of electronic component issue: Infinti (battery drain caused by software bug and poorly grounded wires), Acura (radio hiss, pops, burps, dash and infotainment screens occasionally throw errors and the ignition must be killed to reboot them, voice nav, whether using the car's system or CarPlay can't seem to make up its mind as to which speakers to use and how loud, even using the same app on the same trip - I almost jumped in my seat once), GMC drivetrain EMF causing a whine in the speakers that even when "off" that phased with engine RPM), Nissan (didn't have issues until 120K miles, but occassionally blew fuses for interior components - likely not a manufacturing defect other than a short developed somewhere, but on a high-mileage car that was mechanically sound was too expensive to fix (a lot of trial and error and tracing connections = labor costs). What I suspect will happen is that only the largest commodity suppliers that can really leverage their supply chain will remain, and for the more complex components (think bumper assemblies or the electronics for them supporting all kinds of sensors) will likley consolidate to a handful of manufacturers who may eventually specialize in what they produce. This is part of the reason why seemingly minor crashes cost so much - an auto brand does nst have the parts on hand to replace an integrated sensor , nor the expertice as they never built them, but bought them). And their suppliers, in attempt to cut costs, build them in way that is cheap to manufacture (not necessarily poorly bulit) but difficult to replace without swapping entire assemblies or units).I've love to see an article on repair costs and how those are impacting insurance rates. You almost need gap insurance now because of how quickly cars depreciate yet remain expensive to fix (orders more to originally build, in some cases). No way I would buy a CyberTruck - don't want one, but if I did, this would stop me. And it's not just EVs.
Next