Acura Debuts Performance Electric Vision Design Concept

by Matt Posky

Published: August 18th, 2023

acura debuts electric performance electric vision design concept

While Acura recently unveiled its first production EV, the 2024 ZDX crossover, during Monterey Car Week, the model didn’t quite reach the ridiculous levels of extravagance the event is known for. Fortunately, the company had something in its back pocket with the “Performance Electric Vision Design” concept it teased in tandem with the all-electric ZDX.

It’s not a production vehicle and may not even qualify as a prototype for some model Acura has yet to deliver. But that’s not going to stop people from wondering if it’s going to be the next NSX as manufacturers continue to hype all-electric performance. Let’s face it, were Acura to build something that looked as aggressive as the Performance Electric Vision Design, it would be insane for the brand not to leverage the iconic NSX name.

For now, all the manufacturer is willing to do is call it a design concept for its “electrified future.” But it looks like a Le Mans Prototype (LMP) racer and may foreshadow Acura’s participation in all-electric motorsport. Though that’s a relatively big leap to take from what’s effectively just some shadow-obscured bodywork.

The Electric Vision was created by the Acura Design Studio in Los Angeles (like the ZDX) and debuted at Monterey Car Week as an “electrifying design study with thrilling performance proportions; powerfully sculpted, contrast surfacing; and striking neon green lighting signature further explores the future evolution of Precision Crafted Performance design language as the performance brand transitions to a zero-emissions future.”

"Our Acura design team in Los Angeles is dreaming up the future of Acura Precision Crafted Performance in the EV era," said Dave Marek, Acura executive creative director. "This latest expression of an all-electric high-performance model is inspiring everyone in our studio to push the boundaries and we wanted to share the fun with our Acura fans."

Unfortunately, it’s a little hard to get super excited about the concept when it’s presumably just a shell the company hasn’t even bothered to provide with the proper lighting. We can see the overall shape of the Performance Electric Vision Design but the details are absent, save for its aggressive (and color-changing) exterior illumination.

It may look like an LMP racer. But it feels like Acura’s attempt to remind the world that it hasn’t forgotten about EVs after the electrified ZDX debuted riding on a General Motors platform. Though parent-company Honda has been working on battery electric models and has set a goal to have all its models around the world be either electric or hydrogen fuel cell by 2040.

Though the execution has been akin to what we’ve seen from Toyota. Both automakers have released some mainstream electric crossovers with staggeringly awful names. Toyota now offers the bZ4X, while Honda has released the e:Ny1. But the two companies are clearly prioritizing small, gasoline-electric hybridization as their best defense against government regulators and neither seems interested in ruling how hydrogen power due to how strongly its been incentivized by the Japanese government

Exactly how Honda’s decisions will influence Acura is anyone’s guess. These are uncertain times and it's difficult to predict how things might play out. But we’re dubious about the brand’s next EV being something based directly on the Performance Electric Vision Design. Until the company says otherwise, it’s just automotive eye candy.

[Images: Acura]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#NewsBlog #Acura #Honda #EVs #ConceptVehicles #Design

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 6 comments

Redapple2 on Aug 21, 2023

3 days since posted. Before this, 3 comments >>> Nobody cares?

Like Reply
- Ras815 on Aug 21, 2023
  
  Sadly, no one cares about anything Acura has done for at least 10 years. It's as dead a brand as Infiniti at this point. Honda blew it.
  
  1
ToolGuy on Aug 29, 2023

No one does the homework, do they?
Here is the answer key.
You see, I wasn't lying about ZZ Top.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?