2023 Los Angeles Auto Show Recap -- Stepping in the Right Direction

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

It was gloomy when I landed in Los Angeles last week. Gloomy enough that it put me in a sour mood -- despite living in the Midwest, I like sun.

The same cloud cover that prevented me from getting a view of the city upon approach to LAX painted downtown in a shade of grey that would be right at home in some depressing movie about urban malaise.

Then, on Thursday, the sun came out. Just in time for this year's sole media day.


I am flirting with a cliché here, I know, but the weather seemed to be a metaphor for how the 2023 Los Angeles Auto Show media day drove perception of the automotive industry's health.

One doesn't want to make too much of one day, of course, and I am on the record, as I've written multiple times on this very Web site, that auto-show media days aren't what they used to be and probably not a good indicator of industry health -- and also, even if media days look morose, it doesn't mean consumer days aren't successful.

I won't continue to beat that drum -- put away that Simpsons meme you were about to post, you know the one -- but I did notice that LA was more vibrant than Detroit. And had Stellantis not pulled out due to the uncertainty around the UAW strike, it might have felt like the old times were almost back.

More to the point, conversations I had with OEM reps and analysts and others seemed to suggest that some of the COVID-era issues that have bugged the industry over these past few years might finally be going away.

I had reps for more than one brand suggest to me that supply-chain and production issues, for example, were easing.

As I said, the amount of activity at any one given auto-show media day might not provide great insight to the bigger picture. It works both ways, too -- this year's grim Detroit Auto Show doesn't necessarily signify a larger doom and gloom. Heck, a given media day might not even be an indicator of the health of that specific auto show.

And, as I've said multiple times -- with OEMs looking to capture the news cycle, media days may be, going forward, reduced in influence. Even if a particular auto show is bringing a mass of car-buying humanity through the door during public days.

All that said, the show felt busy enough to give me the feeling that perhaps the industry is moving in a more positive direction, post-COVID. Or at least moving back towards the way things were in 2019.

Putting the big picture aside, each debut caught my interest, but it was a car that didn't get a presser that really had me thinking -- the Honda Prelude.

I wasn't alone in that -- everyone over the age of 30 was fawning over it, thanks to fond memories of the '90s car. That said, it also looks good up close.

Yes, there is an element of disappointment in the fact that Honda has indicated it won't be a true sports car. Still, it was a hit among attending media, based on conversations I had.

As far as the big intros go, we had the new Camry, the updated Forester, a new Kia Sorento (plus two concepts), a debut from Genesis, the Lucid Gravity, a hi-po Hyundai EV, and confirmation of how the Hyundai Santa Fe will be equipped in this market.

The Gravity was the biggest star of the show -- again, among those that got a press conference -- but the Camry slipped under the radar. At least in my opinion.

I don't really care, one way or another, that the car is going hybrid only, though I do think it's nice that AWD becomes available on all trims. Rather, I feel that while the Lucid Gravity may be sexy -- even for a crossover -- with impressive numbers, the Camry is going to be in a lot more driveways. Taking trucks out of the equation, the Camry and its rival, the Honda Accord, are almost always among the most popular purchases. The Camry is, right now, the best-selling sedan on the U.S. market. So it's a big deal whenever it's updated, and more so when the car goes all-in on hybridization.

I don't want to venture a guess on what that means for Toyota's battery EV future. One could argue that Toyota has decided EVs aren't yet worth the investment -- even though the brand sells the bZ4X. One could also argue the opposite -- perhaps Toyota is going hybrid as a bridge towards moving the Camry to an EV setup in the future.

Or, perhaps, Toyota just wants to sell the car on fuel economy and green cred while it works to figure out which powertrain tech is best going forward.

Either way, the Camry bears watching, even if it wasn't the star of the show.

Other assorted musings and hits and misses:


  • Kia's really leaning into the boxy, rugged look with the new Sorento. I am sure the success of the Telluride plays a part, as does the brand's excitement for the upcoming EV9. The next Sorento is not a bad-looking vehicle up close, but boxy can be boring, and I wish the company had borrowed more from the swoopy Sportage hybrid.
  • Speaking of Kia, I am normally indifferent to design-study concepts these days, since the days of truly sexy futuristic concepts are mostly over, but the EV4 drew my eye. It looks really good up close.
  • The Lucid really does look good. So does the Genesis GV80. Maybe I am just finally surrendering to market trends, but these models prove it is possible to make a crossover look stylish.
  • Subaru made the Forester look even more boring, but that's actually good in this case. It's going to blend better and it's easier on the eyes. Yes, you can make crossovers look cool, as I just said above, but many buyers care as much or more about utility and aren't worried about turning heads. Having its stranger styling elements tamed down means the Forester is more bland, but bland can be good. There's something to be said about clean lines.
  • The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is cool but I don't understand why the swoopier Ioniq 6 didn't get the N treatment first. There's probably a good reason (I didn't get a chance to speak to Hyundai folks about it), but the 6 screams for "high performance EV sedan" treatment.
  • If you're going to the show, be sure to wander the side and basement displays. There are some cool cars on hand. I thought the Kevin Hart collection might be corny but the cars were fun to look at it -- only the DJ was cringe. I also liked the Fast and Furious display. Well, mostly the Alfa.
  • Stellantis's presence really was missed. The company usually takes up a lot of floor space, thanks to its various brand displays and its test tracks.
  • Don't worry if you like indoor test tracks -- even with Stellantis sitting out, Ford has one on hand. You can also test various EVs indoors and out.
  • Even though LA was busier than Detroit, it was still a bummer to see so many luxury brands taking a pass. And not just because they often have the best free lattes on the show floor. When small luxury brands feel that auto shows are worth the spend, the industry feels healthier.

If the LA show was an indicator that the industry is moving in a positive direction, we'll know better next year in Chicago and New York. New York, especially, is influential due to the presence of so much business and mainstream press in that city -- journalists who don't normally cover cars. Journalists that will happily cab it from Midtown to Javits for a half-day to see what's new in the automotive world.

Again, I don't want to overstate the meaning of one media day. But when I woke up Friday, the sun was shining seemingly even brighter than it was Thursday. Probably a coincidence, especially in sunny SoCal, but I have to admit I left LA in a better mood than when I landed.

We'll see if the industry follows.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Nov 20, 2023

    Of the vehicles you mentioned, none is more important to a company's survival than the Gravity. I'm glad to hear it looks good in person as well as in photos.

  • Redapple2 Redapple2 on Nov 20, 2023

    HK is mentioned a lot because they are doing a lot (of new product). I like the daring of the styling (but not the product) Subaru FAIL with the new Forester. The grille theme of the long leg- short leg hexagon was "a thing." going for 10 years. Even toyota copied it. Now it has a Ford edge front AND back. The floating roof slash was a thing 8 years ago. Doing away with 95% of the knobs - NO!

    PS- so cal area is great this time of year. SEMA and LA so close together.

  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
  • Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Ollicat I am only speaking from my own perspective so no need to bash me if you disagree. I already know half or more of you will disagree with me. But I think the traditional upscale Cadillac buyer has traditionally been more conservative in their political position. My suggestion is to make Cadillac separate from GM and make them into a COMPANY, not just cars. And made the company different from all other car companies by promoting conservative causes and messaging. They need to build up a whole aura about the company and appeal to a large group of people that are really kind of sick of the left and sending their money that direction. But yes, I also agree about many of your suggestions above about the cars too. No EVs. But at this point, what has Cadillac got to lose by separating from GM completely and appealing to people with money who want to show everyone that they aren't buying the leftist Kook-Aid.
  • Jkross22 Cadillac's brand is damaged for the mass market. Why would someone pay top dollar for what they know is a tarted up Chevy? That's how non-car people see this.
Next