Junkyard Find: 1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

We've had a run of European machinery in this series lately, with six of the last ten Junkyard Finds coming from across the Atlantic ( one from Sweden, one from Italy, two from West Germany and two from France), so today it's the turn of that most Michigandic of machinery: A Chrysler minivan.

Chrysler scored a huge sales hit with its K-platform-derived Dodge Caravan and Plymouth Voyager front-wheel-drive small vans, which debuted as 1984 models and immediately joined forces with the new XJ Jeep Cherokee—also new for 1984—to begin the process of annihilating the station wagon once and for all.

That first generation of squared-off Chrysler minivans lasted through the 1990 model year (the Chrysler-badged Town & Country showed up that year), and it included hot-rod turbocharged vans as well as some with manual transmissions.

The second-generation Caravan/Voyager/Town & Country stayed on the same wheelbases but got got smoother lines and packed on an additional 500 pounds or so of added bulk. Today's Junkyard Find is one of those first-year second-generation Caravans, and it's loaded.

The interior in this van is so nice that I thought it might be a church-on-Sundays-only 50,000-mile vehicle, but in fact it had 165,920 miles on the clock at the end.

Just look at the well-preserved glory of those Nearly Velour™ seats!

This is a high-zoot LE Grand Caravan with front-wheel-drive, just one notch down from the LE AWD Grand Caravan on the Dodge minivan prestige ziggurat for '91.

List price started at $19,255, which comes to about $44,013 in 2023 dollars.

Lesser Caravans got a Chrysler 2.5-liter straight-four engine or Mitsubishi 3.0-liter V6 that year, but the LE received this Chrysler 3.3-liter V6 rated at 150 horsepower and 185 pound-feet.

A five-speed manual transmission was available on the Caravan and Voyager all the way through 1995 (the final year of the second generation), but only with the 2.5 four-cylinder engine. As a Grand Caravan LE, this one has the four-speed automatic rather than the three-speed automatic that went in the more proletariat-grade vans for '91.

Chrysler was going all-out with standard driver's-side airbags in its vehicles by this time, but a bag was still an option for the 1991 Caravan. This one doesn't have one.

This Infinity AM/FM/cassette radio was a $461 option if purchased separately ($1,054 today), but it appears that this van has the Luxury Value Discount Package that included the Infinity audio rig, at a price of just $232 ($530 after inflation) on the Grand Caravan LE.

Were these seats ever used?

All-wheel-drive was new for Chrysler minivans in 1991, and Voyager advertising pushed it relentlessly.

It's the Magic Wagon.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

1991 Dodge Grand Caravan LE in Colorado wrecking yard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 41 comments
  • Tassos Tassos on Nov 27, 2023

    These first crude minivans made a lot of sense, and were hugely successful. The station wagons they replaced were inefficiently designed, very long and wide but with a low roofline. This is an IDIOTIC Design for a car that needs to maximize its volume.


    Having said that, I remember a bunch of us visiting an oil company at Houston for a consortium meeting (we had research proposals for rather modest grants) around that year, 1990 or 1991, a some idiot decided to rent one of these so they would save a few bucks. On the trip back to the airport I sat in the god damned middle row, and it was sheer torture, very cramped, zero legroom.


    Minivans since then became far superior megavans, really. The Odyssey above all and the Sienna also are great family haulers, heavy, big, long wheelbase, and perfect for long trips of a large family. But morons buy Fake SUVs ("Crossovers") instead. Or, even worse, "Broncos".

    • The Oracle The Oracle on Nov 27, 2023

      My goodness you are showing your advanced age today, boomer.


  • Mr Imperial Mr Imperial on Dec 09, 2023

    Seeing the adjusted-for-inflation amount always makes me sick, I can't believe how much it has gone up in my 40-some-odd trips around the sun. Still fondly remember seeing these and Ford Explorers everywhere.





  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next