2024 Mercedes-Benz GLE 53 AMG Review – AMG All the Things

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2024 Mercedes-Benz GLE 53 AMG Fast Facts

Powertrain
3.0-liter turbocharged inline-six cylinder with electric generator/starter motor (429 horsepower @ 6,100 RPM, 413 lb-ft @ 1,800-5,800 RPM)
Transmission/Drive-Wheel Layout
Nine-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPG
18 city / 23 highway / 20 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
Fuel Economy, L/100km
12.9 city / 10.2 highway / 11.7 combined (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
Base Price
$86,750 (U.S.) / $116,000 (Canada)
As-Tested Price
$93,400 (U.S.) / $117,650 (Canada)
Prices include $1,150 destination charge in the United States and N/A for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

How do you take a small crossover and make it better?

Slap the AMG badge on it and give it the AMG treatment.

That process turned the 2023 Mercedes-Benz GLE 53 AMG from just another crossover into something that’s reasonably fun to drive – though the price tag will make eyes water.


It can be hard to justify nearly 100 grand on a small crossover, but 429 horsepower and 413 lb-ft of torque will help. So, too, will AMG-massaged ride and handling.

The 3.0-liter, inline-six turbo underhood also gets a boost from an electric starter/generator.

Having that amount of thrust on hand makes for easy passing and merging – one can find oneself violating the speed limit quickly.

Sometimes tuning for handling can lead to a sacrifice in ride, and while the GLE is a bit on the stiff and sporty side, it’s comfortable enough for urban running while still being ready to corner, thanks to the air suspension. You can, of course, select the proper drive mode for the situation and/or your mood. The GLE has all-wheel drive.

It’s a neat package, giving you comfort, performance, and luxury and combining that with blandly handsome German styling. The interior does feel a tad cramped, though.

Cramped though it is, it’s still a nice place to do the business of driving. Mercedes’ MBUX infotainment is one of the better systems out there, with easy-to-read visuals and lots of customization options, though I do find that it can occasionally require too much menu diving. Some of the controls are haptic touch and the functionality is hit or miss. Same goes for the mouse pad.

I liked the use of steering-wheel mounted controls for the drive modes. As noted, Mercedes is doing screens and haptic touch better than most, but simple still usually remains better. You can also adjust screens with finger swipes.

The digital gauges are easy to read and the instrument panel also offers plenty of customization.

As fun to drive as the GLE can be, and as nicely appointed as it is inside, an 86 grand price of entry is difficult to stomach, even accounting for the cache associated with both the Mercedes-Benz and AMG names. Standard features included the dual 12.3-inch screens for instruments and infotainment, navigation, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, Burmester audio, the MBUX infotainment system, power-folding side mirrors, interior ambient lighting, heated and cooled front seats, dual-zone climate control, and a panoramic sunroof.

Standard safety aids include active brake assist, blind-spot assist, LED headlamps and taillamps, adaptive high beam assist, rearview camera, and active parking assist with surround view.

Options included carbon-fiber trim, an AMG steering wheel, a winter package, 21-inch AMG wheels, and the Night Package (front splitter, roof rails, AMG exhaust, and more). With destination, the price tag was $93,400.

That number is the biggest problem with the GLE 53 AMG. Yes, you need to pay a lot for high performance. But since it’s not necessary, you’re going to have to really want the AMG performance – or at least the AMG name – if you want to drop the extra coin.

I understand that with a few exceptions, most performance vehicles are all about wanting something that’s not logical. Yes, you can find certain sporty vehicles that aren’t too pricey, don’t make you sacrifice too much, and in some cases, have respectable fuel economy.

Most of the time, though, you’re paying extra just to have access to more fun, and you sometimes pay a price at the pump, too (in this case, the numbers are 18/23/20). The question is, is it worth it?

Each individual buyer will make his or her own choice. In this case, I’d say the answer is yes based on what the GLE can do.

That’s if you make full use of its capabilities. Otherwise, you might want to save the dough and not opt for the AMG trim.

It’s your call. Just know that if you start to feel buyers remorse, especially when the monthly payment gets extracted from your account, you can always find a great road and feel better.

UPDATE: I goofed on the title -- this tester was actually a 2024 MY. That said, it appears little has changed from one year to another. I regret the error.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC; Mercedes-Benz]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 38 comments
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next