Biden to Slash U.S. Fossil Fuel Emissions 52 Percent by 2030

Jason R. Sakurai
by Jason R. Sakurai


Today President Joe Biden committed to cutting U.S. fossil fuel emissions up to 52 percent by 2030. His statement came during a virtual climate change summit with 40 world leaders.

Presidents Xi Jinping of China and Vladimir Putin of Russia both committed to working on cutting emissions. In a call to action, Biden said, “The signs are unmistakable. The science is undeniable. The cost of inaction keeps mounting.”

The Biden administration’s return to global climate efforts marked a sharp departure from withdrawal under former President Trump.

First, the Biden plan calls for the U.S. to embrace clean energy, and renovate our electrical grid. Next, we would create batteries for use at home and abroad, and last, we would give up oil and gas exploration and coal mining. Japan announced a 46 percent emissions reduction as its goal. South Korea, not to be left out, said it would stop public financing of new coal-fired power plants. Climate advocacy groups are hoping these proclamations will reduce China and Japan’s use of coal.

Despite technical glitches during the opening of the virtual summit, it did attract many of the world’s most powerful leaders. The pandemic made gathering world leaders too risky. The coronavirus continues to hamper efforts to have meaningful, spontaneous conversations and negotiations. The summit did fulfill Biden’s campaign promise to confront climate change head-on. Biden’s $2 trillion package includes revamping our transportation system, electrical grid, and infrastructure.

China, which discharges more emissions than any other country, said in its opening statement, “To protect the environment is to protect productivity, and to boost the environment is to boost productivity. It’s as simple as that.”

Putin made no mention of his disagreements with Biden, when he said, “Russia is genuinely interested in galvanizing international cooperation so as to look further for effective solutions to climate change as well as to all other vital challenges.” Russia is said to be the fourth-largest emitter of fossil fuel fumes.

The Biden plan would be the U.S.’ most aggressive climate effort ever, even more so than Obama administration reductions in the 2015 Paris climate accord. German Chancellor Angela Merkel welcomed the U.S. back into the accord after Trump pulled out, boosted oil and gas production, and disregarded the science underlying climate warnings.

[Image: Stratos Brilakis/Shutterstock.com]


Jason R. Sakurai
Jason R. Sakurai

With a father who owned a dealership, I literally grew up in the business. After college, I worked for GM, Nissan and Mazda, writing articles for automotive enthusiast magazines as a side gig. I discovered you could make a living selling ad space at Four Wheeler magazine, before I moved on to selling TV for the National Hot Rod Association. After that, I started Roadhouse, a marketing, advertising and PR firm dedicated to the automotive, outdoor/apparel, and entertainment industries. Through the years, I continued writing, shooting, and editing. It keep things interesting.

More by Jason R. Sakurai

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 261 comments
  • JEFFSHADOW JEFFSHADOW on Apr 26, 2021

    Biden won fairly and by the same landslide as the Orange Baboon did in 2016. In the last twenty years when a Republican "won" the presidency, it was never by the actual popular vote; in 2000 it was simply given to him by the Supreme Court. I am fine with Socialist Capitalism and equality for all. And anyone thinking the drumpf was a manager, please keep in mind his six bankruptcies and immoral "values". Good riddance to four years of rule by the fat burger king. Now we just need to wait for him to croak. The sooner the better for faux news. . .

    • See 3 previous
    • Slavuta Slavuta on Apr 29, 2021

      @Lou_BC you mean, "certified". In 1960 we already had this. Back then it was also certified but everyone knew it was bogus.

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Apr 30, 2021

    This thread will never make it to 300 comments.

  • Sobhuza Trooper How Can Unions Break Through in the South?Next up: How can cancer tumors grow, despite chemo and radiation therapy.
  • 1995 SC So with a lease the better the car holds it's value then the better you come out since the lease is basically paying the depreciation over the terms of the lease, correct? Assuming it isn't a factory subsidized lease to move a bunch of turds anyway. So if one isn't sure if the company is going to be around lease end, wouldn't that kill the residual and make these bad lease deals (or worse than a lease on something known to hold it's value)? I've always looked at leases as something companies that needed vehicles did.
  • MaintenanceCosts The parts all exist for Toyota to build a Corolla Cross with a 2.4L turbo four and a manual. Required design effort would be almost zero. Certification cost would be more.That would be a vehicle worthy of the GR name.Does Toyota have the guts?
  • Merc190 I'm confused. If the possibility of considering this is a reality, how might they consider it in the future? It seems that they are currently considering it but have not made a commitment. That said, I don't think they should, I lost a lot of respect for Ford's ST line when it got applied to SUV's with auto transmissions.
  • Roy OBTW They are still all Democrats they just vote republican
Next