SEMA CEO: Electrification Will Cost Aftermarket Jobs
The Specialty Equipment Marketing Association, or SEMA, represents thousands of aftermarket and automotive parts companies, giving it a unique level of sensitivity to changes in emissions, safety, and other vehicle regulations. Recent changes to EPA regulations could bring a seismic shift in the automotive market, making a significant portion of new vehicle sales electric early next decade. SEMA’s President recently shared the organization’s thoughts on the issue, which are predictably skeptical of the changes.
Mike Spagnola’s letter was posted on the SEMA site and said that the organization’s more than 7,000 members “have significant concerns regarding the impact of these proposed regulations on automotive small businesses.” He said the more than one million employees in the aftermarket industry are often overlooked in the push to electrify.
SEMA wants the government to be “technology neutral,” and Spagnola said the organization advocates “for the ability of consumers and the marketplace to choose what works best for them.” Though many companies are already working on aftermarket products for electric vehicles, it’s clear that SEMA views a widespread shift to EVs as a threat to its members.
“The specialty automotive aftermarket business has been built around the internal combustion engine,” Spagnola said. “It is also the same industry that has led the way in fuel innovations and conversions of old vehicles into new and cleaner technologies. Yet it is clear from the Biden administration's actions and words that electrification is their technology of choice.”
[Image: 6th Gear Advertising via Shutterstock]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.
More by Chris Teague
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- ToolGuy "admiring one that drove past the 400k-mile mark during its career"• I bet some of those trips were unnecessary.Remember, the safest most affordable trip is the one you do not take. Also remember, if I am driving there is a good reason for it -- I do not need you clogging up the roads out of habit lol. Learn how to drive, people. This includes knowing when to stay home. 🙂
- MaintenanceCosts These base 740s always seemed incongruous to me. Luxury-grade interior with fabulously comfortable seats and pleasing Scandinavian design, coupled with an unrefined, weak, and noisy (though durable) economy-car engine. They should have added another cylinder or two to the redblock for these cars.
- 2ACL The listing appears to have been taken down. Here are the extended cliff notes on the car's history:- Previous owner went full broke from getting most of the 100k-mile overhaul done.- Current owner continued the good fight but is demoralized by more things breaking regardless, specifically the SMG pump. He believes he can fix it, but isn't keen to, and has his eye on something newer and less problematic.- It was modded.- Personal opinion: this generation of 6 series hasn't aged well. Hard pass for me.
- EBFlex What an absolute joke. These price games Tesla plays is ridiculous
- Tassos Serious car for serious drivers. Price is good especially considering the value of the USD. Watch out for blue smoke and a plan for a healthy maintenance budget. Otherwise this is a decent used car that could very well be a future classic. AS FOR ME, I’M NOT A SERIOUS PERSON SO I’LL CONTINUE FLEXING MY ANCIENT DIESEL BENZES (REBUILT TITLES) LIKE IT’S SOME KIND OF ACCOMPLISHMENT.
Comments
Join the conversation
Kind of hard to be "Technology neutral" when you're trying to eliminate exhaust emissions from all vehicles. The push is for technologies that prevent emissions, which most importantly means not burning hydrocarbons for energy. Now, if you can burn straight hydrogen and NOT derive it from hydrocarbons, then I see no problem with SEMA keeping on as it does. But until that happens, fuel cells and batteries appear to be the way to go.
It is a proven fact that throughout the entire life-cycle (cradle to grave) of an electric vehicle, they are much more harmful to the environment than an ICE. From the mining of the minerals to create the toxic batteries to the electricity generated to recharge them. Go beat the "harmful to the environment in the long run" drum somewhere else!