These Are the 10 Least Reliable Car Brands, Says J.D. Power

by TTAC Staff

Published: February 12th, 2024

Photo credit: silverkblackstock / Shutterstock.com

The J.D. Power 2024 U.S. Vehicle Dependability Study has provided insights into vehicle reliability, indicating a general decline in dependability across the automotive industry. With the industry average

for problems per 100 vehicles (PP100) increasing to 190, the study highlights a growing concern for vehicle owners, particularly with brands that rank lowest in dependability. Here's a focus on the ten brands that are facing the most challenges according to the study.

The Bottom Ten

Chrysler (310 PP100)
Audi (275 PP100)
Land Rover (268 PP100)
Volkswagen (267 PP100)
Lincoln (251 PP100)
Volvo (245 PP100)
Ford (239 PP100)
Infiniti (219 PP100)
Mercedes-Benz (218 PP100)
Acura (216 PP100)

Core Findings and Brand Implications

While the study shows increased issues with infotainment systems and driver assistance technologies, it also brings to light the specific challenges faced by the bottom-ranked brands. Owners have noted problems ranging from the technological complexities of electric vehicles to the traditional mechanical issues.

Toyota and its luxury division, Lexus, have maintained top positions in the study. In contrast, the brands listed above have identified areas needing immediate attention to enhance their vehicles' dependability.

Understanding Vehicle Dependability

The 2024 U.S. Vehicle Dependability Study is based on comprehensive feedback from thousands of vehicle owners. It serves as a vital tool for consumers who value reliability in their vehicle purchasing decisions and for automakers striving to improve their products' performance.

J.D. Power's Role in Automotive Insights

J.D. Power, with its extensive use of big data, AI, and analytical models, continues to provide valuable insights into consumer behavior and industry trends. These insights aid businesses in shaping strategies that align with customer expectations and experiences.

This article was co-written using AI and was then heavily edited and optimized by our editorial team.

TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments

Join the conversation

1 comment

Fred on Feb 12, 2024
The JD Power article doesn't mention what year the cars were. Is this just 2024 cars or what?

1 Reply

Recent Comments

Varezhka The biggest underlying issue of Mitsubishi Motors was that for most of its history the commercial vehicles division was where all the profit was being made, subsidizing the passenger vehicle division losses. Just like Isuzu.And because it was a runt of a giant conglomerate who mainly operated B2G and B2B, it never got the attention it needed to really succeed. So when Daimler came in early 2000s and took away the money making Mitsubishi-Fuso commercial division, it was screwed.Right now it's living off of its legacy user base in SE Asia, while its new parent Nissan is sucking away at its remaining engineering expertise in EV and kei cars. I'd love to see the upcoming US market Delica, so crossing fingers they will last that long.
ToolGuy A deep-dive of the TTAC Podcast Archives gleans some valuable insight here.
Tassos I heard the same clueless, bigoted BULLSHEET about the Chinese brands, 40 years ago about the Japanese Brands, and more recently about the Koreans.If the Japanese and the Koreans have succeeded in the US market, at the expense of losers such as Fiat, Alfa, Peugeot, and the Domestics,there is ZERO DOUBT in my mind, that if the Chinese want to succeed here, THEY WILL. No matter what one or two bigots do about it.PS try to distinguish between the hard working CHINESE PEOPLE and their GOVERNMENT once in your miserable lives.
28-Cars-Later I guess Santa showed up with bales of cash for Mitsu this past Christmas.
Lou_BC I was looking at an extended warranty for my truck. The F&I guy was trying to sell me on the idea by telling me how his wife's Cadillac had 2 infotainment failures costing $4,600 dollars each and how it was very common in all of their products. These idiots can't build a reliable vehicle and they want me to trust them with the vehicle "taking over" for me.