China is Unhappy with the Inflation Reduction Act and Has Complained to the WTO

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Among many other things, the Inflation Reduction Act changed the way EV tax credits work in the United States. With an eye on reducing America’s dependence on Chinese batteries and materials, the Act incentivizes automakers to source materials from free-trade-compliant countries and build EVs in North America. Now, China is expressing its unhappiness with the legislation by raising a dispute with the World Trade Organization.


The Chinese Ministry of Commerce claimed the Inflation Reduction Act is “discriminatory” and said it has “seriously distorted” supply chains. At the same time, the U.S. is making similar claims against China, saying the country has used unfair policies to manipulate the global market in its favor.


Legal experts say this case might not be so airtight for China, noting that the U.S. will mount a vigorous defense. That said, the Inflation Reduction Act apparently does run afoul of WTO rules, which has already been pointed out by the EU.


U.S. politicians of all sorts have expressed distrust of China, and no one appears ready to go soft on the Asian giant’s EVs. The country’s electric vehicle industry has grown rapidly in recent years, as government subsidies and other incentives have driven research and development of new models.


While BYD, China’s largest EV maker, has said it would not come to the U.S., others might. Additionally, Chinese EVs are expanding their reach into Mexico, and some expect other brands to reach the U.S. by 2025 or shortly after. That said, there is still the matter of Chinese tariffs, which can add thousands to the price of a new EV as it enters the United States.


[Image: Tada Images via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 76 comments
  • Jpolicke Jpolicke on Mar 28, 2024

    In a communist dictatorship, there isn't much export activity that the government isn't aware of. That being the case, if the PRC wanted to, they could cut the flow of fentanyl down to a trickle. Since that isn't happening, I therefore assume Xi Jinping doesn't want it cut. China needs to feel the consequences for knowingly poisoning other countries' citizens.

    • See 1 previous
    • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Apr 01, 2024

      @Slavuta a quite impressive job of expressing as many unsupported conspiracy theories as possible in very few words.



  • VoGhost VoGhost on Apr 01, 2024

    Interesting. Oil wealthy gulf nations, Russia, January 6 traitors, and now China all hate the Inflation Reduction Act. But who does like the IRA?

    - People on prescription drugs, because prices are coming down, starting with insulin at $35/month

    - Companies that run on electricity, because generation supply is increasing rapidly

    - People who like to have jobs, because of all the factories being built to make EVs, solar panels and batteries.

    - American consumers, who like getting 30% off the price of sustainable energy from solar

    - People who like getting $7,500 of their taxes back when they buy an efficient car built in America

    - People who like that inflation is now down to 2.5% in the US

    - In short, Americans.

    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Apr 01, 2024

      Again, VoGhost, if you can just post a link to the talking points you are paid to work from and skip the acerbic commentary, that would be great.


  • Detlump I almost bought a dark red one of these when I was cross-shopping Volvo wagons. I didn't like the frameless glass of the doors but it was a close call. I wanted a wagon for my hockey gear and also carrying parts as I was an engineer at the time. SUVs weren't a thing at that point and I wanted an enclosed, secure cargo area.I ended up going with a 95 850 wagon and it has served me well. The only time it left me stranded (temporarily) was when the coil wire popped off. I also got a flat tire, but I can't blame the Volvo for that. BTW, I still have the 950 with 263,000 miles - just changed the timing belt too - I have that process down to about an hour by now!
  • Wjtinfwb 18 year old Euro with admitted "issues". RUN from this money pit. My experience with European cars is time is more of an enemy than Mileage. I'd rather a 5 year old BMW with 120k miles than a 15 year old one with 50k. Electronics, wiring, plastics, exterior trim etc. just crumble with time, particularly if the car has lived in a harsh climate outside. I have folders of receipts from BMW, VW and Audi shops if you'd like to see the evidence of my thesis.
  • Wjtinfwb We too have a Subaru, a '16 Crosstrek. Aside from it's appetite for batteries (or crappy Subaru batteries), so far it's been a reliable ride, but from day one I've always thought it felt flimsy. I'm sure we'll get good service out of it and have no plans to replace it, but won't be surprised if it starts nickel and diming up as all those plastics and the electronics start to age.
  • Bd2 Excellent article, very nice car. Thank you Murilee.
  • Make_light I like Subarus, and I often think they don't get enough credit for how they drive. Lots of people say it's the faux-rugged image that accounts for their popularity, but they also drive with a solidity and plantedness that's absent from a lot of the Japanese competition. That being said, this thing is ugly. I never felt that Subarus were as ugly as commenters claim they are. Boring, sure, but not necessarily ugly. But between this and the refreshed Legacy, it's like they're trying to make their vehicles look as incohesive and awkward as possible.
Next