2024 Chevrolet Trax Activ Review – A Surprising Bargain

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2024 Chevrolet Trax Activ Fast Facts

Powertrain
1.2-liter turbocharged inline three-cylinder (137 horsepower @ 5,000 RPM, 162 lb-ft @ 2,500 RPM)
Transmission/Drive-Wheel Layout
Six-speed automatic, front-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPG
28 city / 32 highway / 30 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, L/100km
8.3 city / 7.4 highway / 7.9 combined. (NRCan Rating)
Base Price
$23,900 (U.S.) / $31,030 (Canada)
As-Tested Price
$26,540 (U.S.) / $32,620 (Canada)
Prices include $1,095 destination charge in the United States and $2,100 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

The Chevrolet Trax was once on my short list for worst vehicles on the market.

I remember some years ago, before joining TTAC, going to San Diego for the launch of the first-generation Trax. All I could think was that the little runabout was something to be avoided unless you just wanted cheap transport in crossover form.


The 2024 Chevrolet Trax Activ remains affordable, but unlike its predecessor, I actually enjoyed driving it. With the previous gen, I would’ve felt embarrassed to own one. With the current one, I’d not avert my eyes downward and mumble the name “Trax” if someone asked what I drive.

Let’s be clear upfront lest you accuse me of huffing paint during my off hours – the Trax is still no sports car or luxury tourer. It’s not going to be lusted after. But it’s no longer a cynical exercise in filling every segment, nor is it any longer a penalty box.

No, now it’s a sub-$30K small crossover that’s appointed well enough and relatively engaging to drive. Oh, and it’s fuel efficient. Perhaps not the worst choice for the urbanite who needs something cheap and easy to park.

It’s no burner – I’d not expect a ton of punch from a 1.2-liter turbocharged three-cylinder making 137 horsepower and 162 lb-ft of torque. Indeed, acceleration is probably the weakest component of its driving dynamics. It’s not super slow – it holds its own in traffic – but passing and merging will require a little bit of patience.

Where the Trax surprised me, pleasantly, was with ride and handling. Especially handling. Yes, it is a crossover, so you get some body roll, but the turn-in is sharp. The steering is a tad artificial in flavor, but its weighted well and accurate. The stereotype of the nimble urban crossover applies here.

It’s not all about the drive, either – the interior design is interesting, if not attractive (beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all), and the feature list is nice. Even the materials feel relatively nice for the price point – not upscale, but better than you’d expect given the MSRP.

The angular interior design may or may not be your cup of tea, but it does allow for an integrated infotainment screen.

Of course, buying downmarket often means drawbacks, and the Trax’s biggest flaws are slightly cramped quarters and a bit too much noise. And while the interior materials generally feel nicer than you’d expect, there are some occasions in which the vehicle doesn’t feel screwed together super well – a trait I’ve noticed on other inexpensive GM models in the past.

My test unit came equipped with remote start, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, keyless entry and starting, active noise cancellation, satellite radio, 8-inch digital gauge screen, 11-inch infotainment screen, heated front seats, heated steering wheel, 18-inch wheels, LED headlamps, rear spoiler, front pedestrian braking, forward collision alert, front pedestrian braking, lane-keep assist with lane-departure warning, and a rearview camera.

That was for $23,900. Options included two packages – one that included a sunroof and wireless device charging, and another that included rear cross-traffic alert, lane-change alert with side blind-zone alert, and adaptive cruise control.

The as-tested price was $26,540.

Unlike the first time I drove a new generation of Trax for the first time, I found myself charmed. No one is going to desire this vehicle – no one is going to put Trax posters on a bedroom wall or as wallpaper on their phone’s home screen – but if you need affordable wheels and/or the utility that’s offered by a small crossover, you won’t feel punished because you chose to, or had to, spend less than 30 large.

Affordable value that doesn’t totally sacrifice fun. What a concept.

[Images: Chevrolet]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 91 comments
  • Geozinger Geozinger on Jan 08, 2024

    @28-Cars: In this neck of the woods, you will pay at least 30K with TTL for most any new car these days. I'm happy with this car.

  • Rover Sig Rover Sig on Mar 30, 2024

    Worth mentioning that the Trax is made in Bupyeong, South Korea, and is based on the same platform as the new Buick Envista -- which is a stunning looking car. Not that I like Buicks, not after buying that 1981 Skylark.

  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
  • ChristianWimmer It might be overpriced for most, but probably not for the affluent city-dwellers who these are targeted at - we have tons of them in Munich where I live so I “get it”. I just think these look so terribly cheap and weird from a design POV.
Next