Rivian Cuts Deal for Tesla Charging Network, Adopts Supercharger Connector

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While most automakers were working out what their first all-electric model should be, Tesla was building up a proprietary charging network that helped assure that it would be the EV manufacturer other brands would envy. The vehicles themselves certainly became the benchmark for electric vehicles. But it was the network that guaranteed Tesla’s dominant position in the market. Simply having access to the Supercharger stations is one of the biggest perks of owning a Tesla, as they’re relatively common and suffer less downtime than rival networks.

Despite originally being exclusive to Tesla customers, the brand has decided to open its ports up to the whole world. Ford and General Motors have even signed agreements with the company so that their customers can utilize those charging stations in 2024. Now it appears to be Rivian’s turn.


On Tuesday, the brand announced that had likewise struck a deal with Tesla and would be adopting the North American Charging Standard (NACS). As with GM and Ford, customers are supposed to be able to utilize Tesla Superchargers early next year. Though Rivian was dropping some pretty unsubtle hints leading up to the news by issuing an over-the-air update that made the stations easier for its customers to find.


From Rivian:

 An adapter will be available to enable Rivian's award-winning R1T and R1S to charge on the Supercharger network as early as spring 2024. Rivian will incorporate North American Charging Standard (NACS) charge ports as standard in future R1 vehicles starting in 2025, as well as in its upcoming R2 platform.
Transportation is responsible for over a quarter of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, highlighting the urgent need to electrify the sector and preserve our world for future generations. By enabling drivers to charge their vehicles at a greater number of locations, this collaboration and others like it are important to help accelerate EV adoption.


“We’re excited to work with Tesla and to see collaborations like this help advance the world toward carbon neutrality,” Stated Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe. “The adoption of the North American Charging Standard will enable our existing and future customers to leverage Tesla’s expansive Supercharger network while we continue to build out our Rivian Adventure Network. We look forward to continuing to find new ways to accelerate EV adoption.”


As things currently stand, Tesla’s Superchargers represent a majority of the fast chargers that exist in North America. They represent about 60 percent of the entire market, giving every rival network a grand total of 40 percent when combined.


While there are far more standard charging points dotted across the country, EV drivers recoup most of their energy at home. Fast charging only becomes essential for electric owners hoping to take an extended road trip or needing to regain a significant amount of range in a short amount of time. Depending on the size of the battery, even Level 2 stations can take most of the day to recharge a vehicle that’s almost out of power.


This is not the case with Tesla’s Superchargers, which the company has said can recoup “up to” 200 miles of range in just 15 minutes. Gasoline may still be quicker. But improved charging capabilities are narrowing the gap and helping consumers rationalize EV purchases.


[Image: Rivian]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 16 comments
  • Tassos One my LAST YEARS TEACHING AT A LOW RENT institution I had to buy a FEMALE UNDERGRAD a fiat 500 after SHE THREATENED TO COME FORWARD about my unwelcome advances. THAT IS WHY I DISLIKE SMALL CARS AND THE METOO MOVEMENT
  • 3-On-The-Tree My son drives my hand me down 2010 Corolla. I bought that car new and drove it from Ft Huachuca Az to Ft Leavenworth Kansas for the Staff college the to Ft Bliss Tx then gave it to my oldest son then my second son and now my youngest son. They all want the 2009 C6 Corvette and 2002 Suzuki Hayabusa.
  • Tassos BIDEN BRATISLAVA VIP BREADVAN ON STILTS!
  • Ted The automotive period we are in reminds me of the malaise era of the 70s and early 80s. Government emission mandates exceeded the available engineering capabilities of most auto makers (sans Honda). Mileage, performance, and reliability all decreased. It wasn’t until both fuel injection and electronic engine control became available that all three improved again.Seems BEVs are in a similar spot; battery technology needs breakthrough improvement, charging needs to be faster and more ubiquitous. As those things happen, BEVs will make more sense.Agree the aspirational mandates are ahead of the current technology and infrastructure.
  • Golden2husky This was a common topic at work - kids learned how to drive, and now another car is needed. I was amazed at all the excuses made about how their kid must have a new car. Used cars are a "risk" for breakdown, they are not as safe, etc...which is all BS of course. How much difference in safety is there between a new car and the same model that is five years old? Maintained cars don't break down very often. I've driven cars for far, far longer than most and have been towed exactly twice in my entire driving career (about 800,000 miles). While I wouldn't put my daughter into a 15 year old car and let her drive across the country, I would be fine with a 5 year old car that was well cared for. Let's be realistic - new drivers are likely to get into a fender bender - why do that to a new car. I was thrilled to get an 8 year old car for college back in the day even though my folks could afford to buy all of us new cars if they wanted to. If you Want to buy your kid new, go ahead. Just don't freak out when they come home with a fresh dent.
Next