Report: Dealers Worried About Getting EV Refunds From the Government

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Nobody likes bureaucratic red tape or waiting on payment and this seems to have become a sticking point for retailers nervously waiting to see how the United States’ updated EV tax credit scheme plays out.

According to a report from Automotive News, dealers are getting worked up about the prospect of not receiving money swiftly enough — mimicking some of the hardships endured during the Cash-for-Clunkers period.


From Automotive News:


Starting in 2024, eligible EV buyers will be able to transfer federal tax credits to dealers and use those funds as a down payment. The credit transfer is allowed under the Inflation Reduction Act's Section 30D credit for new EV purchases and Section 25E credit for used EVs, which provide consumers with up to $7,500 and $4,000, respectively, if certain requirements are met.
The U.S. Treasury Department said participating dealers will be able to register via an online IRS portal in the next few months. In January, those dealers will be able to submit EV sales information to the IRS and "promptly receive payments for transferred credits," Lily Batchelder, assistant secretary for tax policy, told reporters this month.
While many of the finer details are still to come, several dealers told Automotive News they are concerned about how seamlessly the process will play out on their showroom floors and how soon they will be reimbursed by the government.
"History would tell us we have a lot to be nervous about," said Tyler Slade, operating partner at Tim Dahle Nissan Southtowne in suburban Salt Lake City.
While applying the credit to a vehicle at the point of sale — or cash on the hood — is the "optimal situation," it puts more burden on the dealerships, Slade said.
"You're going to have plenty of dealers that aren't going to be comfortable with that risk … waiting for the government to pay, much like Cash for Clunkers," he said.


Leading up to the last presidential election, your author actually covered Biden’s desire to reboot the contentious Cash-for-Clunkers (aka the 2009 Car Allowance Rebate System) program implemented under the Obama administration with an electrified twist. While skepticism abounded — mainly because the deal seemed to have advantaged automakers more than regular Americans or the environment — Joe Biden ended up taking the 2020 election and has managed to get several components of the scheme activated through the so-called “ Inflation Reduction Act.”


The most important aspects fell under the updated EV tax credit scheme, which was changed in a manner that effectively made government subsidies a permanent fixture. There was no longer any limit to the length of time the industry could benefit. However, new protocols also dictated that vehicles fall below a certain price threshold, boast a specific quantity of domestic components, and buyers fall within the approved income brackets.


Since some of that isn’t settled yet, dealers are getting anxious. They want clear regulatory frameworks and a way to swiftly be paid for any transferred credits.


"There are horror stories out there that dealers didn't get paid for six months," said Michelle Primm, managing partner at the Ohio-based Cascade Auto Group, recalling the brief Cash-for-Clunkers era.


"Car dealers are asset rich and cash poor. Cash flow is something we look at every single day in a car dealership," she continued. "What if that $200,000 the government owes me is the same time I have a big payroll, and I have floorplan to pay off and, oh, it's tax time? All of a sudden, the dealer is in a cash crunch."


Frankly, it’s hard to have any empathy for automotive dealerships these days. While stores may have had to wait a while during the original Cash-for-Clunkers, the plan resulted in their getting a temporary sales boost. Meanwhile, modern showrooms have been hosing down customers with all manner of markups for a few years now. This was formerly the result of pandemic lockdowns crippling supply chains and stifling production. But it managed to persist after inventories began to stabilize and have become a fixture of the car-buying experience.


It’s unsustainable in the long run, especially considering how ravaged the economy appears to be these days. The average American household can’t even afford the typical new vehicle anymore and manufactures continue raising prices due to inflationary pressures.


Whether or not you hate what dealers are doing today, they could find themselves in a tricky situation if they garner a lot of EV sales. This is especially true for the smaller dealerships that have to operate lean. The industry has already been changing in ways that favors consolidation and the biggest dealer networks keep growing while their more humble competitors fall by the wayside or are bought out.


"A fair repayment time would be within five to seven days," Mike DeSilva, owner New Jersey’s Liberty Auto Group, suggested to Automotive News. "Once it starts to be any longer than that, dealers will be less likely to lay out the money and wait for it. … We don't want to see a repeat of Cash for Clunkers."


But they presumably won’t for some time. Cash for Clunkers was a sweeping program that offered consumers as much as $4,500 to trade in their old vehicle for something more fuel efficient and model and drove up used vehicle prices as secondhand models were crushed in record numbers. Meanwhile, the updated EV tax credit scheme probably won’t see broad eligibility due to just how many vehicles source components (particularly batteries) from Asia.


This means only select brands and models will be impacted by any meaningful degree in the short term. However, the issue could become a problem further down the road as more companies bring battery manufacturing to North America. Still, it sounds like dealers would still rather have the scheme in place to help bolster EV sales that have plateaued in recent months than not. They’re just mad about the extra paperwork and having to deal with a slow-moving government bureaucracy reminiscent of the Cash-for-Clunkers era. 


"The downside, of course, was dealers didn't get paid very fast, and the reimbursement process was a little clunky," said Brian Maas, president of the California New Car Dealers Association. "But all in all, it did move a lot of metal, and that was a good thing, and I think the goal of all these [Inflation Reduction Act] credits is to move EVs."


The National Automobile Dealers Association has likewise been in regular contact with the U.S. Treasury to ensure things go its way.


"NADA's focus has been on communicating to the administration what is going to be really necessary to lead to a successful implementation of the statute, and what we are stressing is the need for all parties to have a workable, repeatable, standard operating procedure and to avoid scenarios that could lead to confusion or ambiguity," NADA spokesperson Jared Allen said in a statement.


Maybe this is an insane pitch. But some of us would probably just like things to return to normal where the government isn’t “helping” so much and only suckers are forced into paying above MSRP.


[Image: Paul Brennan/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 33 comments
  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next