Pencil-Necked Finance Dweebs Suggest Anyone Making Six-Figures Should Only Buy a $15,000 Car

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Look, we’re all for a pinch or two of financial prudence around here. Springing for luxury items just isn’t in the cards for most of us, despite the lavish recompense* deigned upon us by our corporate overlords in Downtown Canada. (*note: the recompense isn’t actually lavish at all).


But even we feel comfortable calling out moronic fiscal advice when we see it. Case in point – a post on a website called Investopedia suggests that anyone making $100,000 per year should spend no more than roughly $15,000 on a car.


And, yes, the post seems to have been recently updated, with a dating of December 2023 and interest rates grounded in the current (horrible) reality we find ourselves. In order to reach this out-of-touch conclusion, the killjoys at Investopedia start with an assumption that one should limit their transportation expenses to 10 percent of an annual salary, including insurance, fuel, maintenance, and the car payment itself. Beyond that, they suggest making a down payment of at least 20 percent and financing the thing for no more than four years.


At the gross income of $100,000 annually, this shakes out to $10,000 per year or about $833 per month. Setting some variables in this equation, they propose a monthly insurance rate of $147, fuel costs of $260 per month, and maintenance pegged at $95.50 per month (about 10 cents per mile). Simple math leaves is with $330.50 for a car payment. To slide in at that figure over 48 months at 8.3 percent interest with 20 percent down, Investopedia suggests a total purchase price for your shiny new car – including taxes and whatever other fees a dealer feels like charging that day – at just $16,687.


Sixteen thousand, six hundred and eighty-seven dollars. On a car. In this economy whilst making a hundred grand. We’ll let that recommendation sink in for a second. To be fair, Investopedia does recognize the current state of the car industry elsewhere in the post, pointing out the unfortunate reality that the average transaction price of a new vehicle in America is nearly 50 grand whilst the average used set of wheels is in the $26,500 ballpark.


In fact, I feel my headline figure of $15,000 is actually generous, since the $16,687 estimate includes dealer fees and taxes. The latter generally ranges between 4 and 8 percent depending on location in this county, while anyone who’s been inside a dealership in their life knows the propensity of the business office to try and pad purchase prices with various and sundry items of questionable value. Don’t take the TruCoat.


Moseying over to AutoTrader, we find a rogue’s gallery of cars on offer for that sum. A ’17 Jag XF with 88K looks nice but is sure to cost far more than 10 cents a mile in maintenance. Same goes for the myriad of decade-old BMW X5s and Merc C-Class sedans. A fifteen-year-old Ram 1500 with 131k in near-base trim is a depressing thought to have in the driveway whilst making $100,000 per year, as is the two-wheel drive Tundra with 149k from Obama’s first term. The newest option is a Mitsubishi Mirage, of course – though you do have a choice of sedan or hatchback.


So – how about it, B&B? Am I being too snobby? Should I be resetting my sights to fiscal prudence and reality instead of thinking that anyone making six-figures shouldn’t be poked into an econobox or knackered old pickup truck? Perhaps my thinking is a root of the problem that’s caused note terms to regularly crest 84 months and debt loads to skyrocket.


Nah. Who am I kidding? If I made $100,000 per year, I sure wouldn’t be tooling around in a 2016 Equinox.


[Image: Jonathon Weiss via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 197 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jan 19, 2024

    Update: The Rules Have Changed

    So it turns out that (contrary to the advice of old farts like me) you should actually listen to the Helpful Guidance handed out at Your Local Bank and Borrow Borrow Borrow for that Questionable Degree but just be sure you are Playing For The Right Team and you shall be handed $75,000.

    Long live Free Enterprise.

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Feb 01, 2024

    So close to 200 comments... 😉

  • Funky D Back in our day, it would have been an old-school carbureted car with mechanical everything so maintenance would be easy and said teen would learn something along the way.Nowadays, I would get a reliable 4-cylinder car. They certainly don't need a whole lot of horsepower (and in the early 80s, when I was that teenager, there wasn't much HP available!), and unfortunately, other than basic maintenance like oil changes, filters, and possibly brakes.
  • IH_Fever Coming soon to a high school parking lot near you, with a flat black painted hood, huge wing, and a hole in the muffler...
  • 3-On-The-Tree Motorcycles can be dangerous but there ways to minimize the risk. While in Army flight school the commanding Major General from the U.S Army safety center briefed all the pilots on all the bike fatalities in the Army that year and 99% of them were caused from riders drinking and riding in addition to reckless driving. Don’t drink and slow down reduces that risk by over 99%. You can apply that advice to a lot of things in life. And yes I ride, since 1998. 2002 Hayabusa, 2005 Suzuki Vstrom, 2007 Kawasaki KLR650, 1977 Suzuki GT750 and 1980 Suzuki GS1000. No accidents currently.
  • Jackie morgan I have a 1983 S-10 Durango. Bought new 1 owner. Still in original condition. Garage kept no rust dealer undercoat. V6 automatic, longbed. Loaded with extras. Transmission needs work. Body in great condition.
  • Wjtinfwb We had a few 500/Taurus cars in the company fleet. If a long trip was on the docket, I always tried to reserve one as they were great road cars with a ton of room front and back and gigantic trunk. Decent highway manners and a comfortable ride. The high seating position came from the basic design of the Taurus, it shared structure and underpinnings with the Gen 1 Volvo XC90 and S80, I believe it had pretty good crash test results as a side benefit of the Volvo design. The most remarkable part of this generation Taurus however was it's incredibly boring and down market interior. Dull as dishwater.
Next