Hagerty's 2024 Bull Market List Has a Few Surprises

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Hagerty recently released the seventh installment of its annual Bull Market List, and while this year’s picks are mostly predictable, there are a few interesting surprises. The company’s list highlights cars that it feels are set to grow in value over the next few years, with some exotics and classics and a growing number of “Rad Era” cars every year.


Hagerty’s 2024 list includes:

·     1997-2002 Plymouth Prowler

·     1964-1966 Ford Thunderbird

·     1981-1986 Jeep CJ-8 Scrambler

·     1965-1970 Chevrolet Impala SS

·     2000-2005 Jaguar XKR

·     2011-2016 Ferrari FF

·     1997-1999 Mitsubishi Pajero Evolution

·     2008-2013 BMW M3

·     1946-1950 Chrysler Town & Country

·     1989 Lamborghini Countach 25th Anniversary


A few of those are “duh” entries on the list, but the Prowler is kind of a dark horse. We’ve come full circle with cars like the Plymouth, reaching a point where it’s become cool unironically. The Pajero Evo is a cool choice as this year’s lone JDM entry, but it’s been aggressively climbing in price for a while now.


Hagerty’s list is meant to highlight cars that can be good values with enough research and time on the purchase side. It says it does not mean to celebrate inflated values or make specific models more expensive than they already are. Besides, as Hagerty notes, fun should be the primary goal with car buying, not necessarily making money.


[Image: Dave Goodman via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 24 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Dec 27, 2023

    I'm not surprised seeing the Scrambler added to the list. Jeeps haven't come close to reached Bronco pricing which is nice for shade tree builders.

  • MRF 95 T-Bird MRF 95 T-Bird on Dec 28, 2023

    @Art_Vandelay

    I owned a 95 LX with the 4.6 modular from 2007 until late 2019. It was a nice driving and handling car that was quite reliable with normal maintenance. Probably one of the best vehicles I owned, though my previous 87 Thunderbird was quite solid. I sold it and upgraded to a leftover 2018 Dodge Challenger GT awd.

    • See 2 previous
    • Art_Vandelay Art_Vandelay on Dec 30, 2023

      Solid choice IMHO for that role. It was really the last car like it made.



  • FreedMike I don't see why you can't have both EVs and conventionally powered cars.
  • Zerofoo We leased a new CX-5 for my daughter when she started driving. We put nothing down and bought gap insurance. The theory was if she totaled the car, it was nothing more than a rental. If she kept the car in good shape and the car was reliable, we would, at the end of the lease, have the opportunity to buy a low-mileage 3 year old used car.
  • Peter KODAK Moment
  • Eliyahu Toyota has looked at the state of the world and decided that hybrids are the best fit for currently achieving environmental and regulatory goals. Their hybrid production is now across many of their models. Honda is following suit. They will both likely also produce some electric vehicles. The best path forward is likely higher fuel taxes, with some tax credit offsets for the lower tax brackets. This would encourage a move toward more fuel efficient vehicles. The US big 3 auto makers are the ones with the most to lose here-they are the late adapters-coasting on trucks.
  • 28-Cars-Later Used Teslas are getting very cheap, but buying one can be risky - Ars Technica Teslas are very connected cars, and many of their convenience features are accessed via smartphone apps. But that requires that Tesla's database shows you as the car's owner, and there are plenty of reports online that transferring ownership from Hertz can take time.Unfortunately, this also leaves the car stuck in Chill driving mode (which restricts power, acceleration, and top speed) and places some car settings outside of the new owner's level of access. You also won't be able to use Tesla Superchargers while the car still shows up as belonging to Hertz. Based on forum reports, contacting Tesla directly is the way to resolve this, but it can take several days to process; longer if there's a paperwork mismatch.Once you've transferred ownership to Tesla's satisfaction, it's time to do a software reset on the car to remove the fleet version.So apparently the state maintains title but so does Tesla in a way, and they cripple some features until they feel satisfied in unlocking them to you. How long till they brick it by satellite because, reasons? But yes, rah! rah! BEV! - its not a tool of tyranny at all, honest. Edit: Comment from the Ars forum: Happy MediumArs Tribunus Militum 19y When I got to the section that stated that THE CAR WILL BE FUNCTIONALLY CRIPPLED unless you get Tesla's acceptance of you buying the car, I got incredibly infuriated. How in the hell is this going to work going forwards? Is Tesla literally going to be approving every single resale of its cars from now until the car is totaled? Jeezus, connected is one thing, but having final ownership authority in the hands of the manufacturer and not the seller/purchaser seems horrible. 28's thoughts to Happy Medium.
Next