Retro Styling Kit Appears for the Toyota Tacoma

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

If you’ve always wanted your last-gen Toyota Tacoma to look like a Land Cruiser from the 1980s, a company based in Japan has just the solution for you.


An outfit called Flex has apparently been slinging these types of conversions for some spell but is now expanding its presence into America through a location in San Diego. The new kit is made solely for the American market, which makes sense since the Tacoma can be in short supply in Japan compared to Jacksonville. The retro refit gifts the truck with round headlights and a grille sure to remind gearheads of the 60-Series Land Cruiser. Steel bumpers are a good upgrade over stock units, no matter what you think of the rest of this styling mashup, and the company makes specific mention of a ‘straight line hood design’ though there’s no talk of new fenders or the like.


It seems the Flex team will hoover your bank account for at least $52,800 for one of these creations, though that is a sum that includes the price of a second-hand Tacoma. Given the prices those things tend to command, especially in the SoCal market, it’s not entirely clear how much the kit itself costs. Some of the other wares described on the Flex site suggest a person can bring their own rig for conversion, so customers who want to renovate their own Taco may be able to do just that. 


Arguments have raged for eons about the effectiveness of these types of conversions in which an older car’s visage is pasted onto a modern machine. Those ’49 Ford faces on an MN12 Thunderbird are jarring to this author’s eye, as are the pre-squarebody Chevy Blazer fronts attached to modern Tahoe SUVs. Sometimes the old-school rectilinear lines don’t flow with contemporary cues. This is a blend that seems to work better than most, no doubt in partial thanks to Toyota’s glacial-like design cycles. 


Figure on a two- to five-month build time, which is one heckuva range estimate. If you’re in the San Diego area early next year and spot one of these things prowling the street, be sure to drop us a line.


[Image: Flex]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • Wjtinfwb Basically a Frontier underneath. Unless basic maintenance has been totally ignored, this is probably a great 2nd or starter car.
  • Jkross22 AFAIK, I have only been asked once and all it required was checking a box, signing and dating a form and mailing back. It just happened, actually. BMW finance asked me to send a form back to them option out of them selling my data. How kind of them. Automatically signing me up to give away data. It's no wonder I have trust issues.
  • Lou_BC I don't have much need for inverters since newer vehicles have USB ports. My 2 coolers have built-in inverters. I do have a few Canadian Tire branded Chinesium ones for odds and ends stuff. Nothing high output.
  • Lou_BC "Covertly" Bullsh!t. The proper word is "overt". It is done because everyone cannot be bothered to read the EULA. If you subscribe to anything electronic, or you use anything electronic, your data gets monetized. It's even sold "sanitized" of specific identifiers.
  • Lou_BC Will I give up data aka privacy to save money?. ...............................You mean other than the data I give up by using credit cards, bank cards, cell phones, and computers?...,...................................... The majority of "spirited" driving I do is in the backcountry. There isn't any data connection out there. Google and other assorted electronic maps are woefully inaccurate. At the end of the day, I'm not concerned. .......................................... I was told that there wasn't much point getting extended warranty because I drive offroad. That had nothing to do with data. Just fine print in the insurance................................ I fully agree with @Dartman. I'm considering "safe" because of my age and lack of reported accidents.
Next