Report: The Next-Gen BMW M3 Will Land with Electric and ICE Powertrains

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

BMW has aggressive electrification plans, but the automaker isn’t taking its eye off the internal combustion ball. A new report from BMW Blog states that BMW is planning a next-generation M3 between 2027 and 2028 that will land with gas and electric configurations.


BMW Blog noted that BMW will release the next-gen gas-powered G84 M3 with an electric M3 wearing the internal chassis code ZA0. The publication said that BMW would likely continue using the S58 inline-six for the next-gen cars and that the current car would be getting a facelift later this year.


While these are just reports, and BMW could change anything (or everything) between now and the car’s eventual release, the change in strategy aligns with shifts we’ve seen in the auto market over the last year. Demand for EVs is growing, but slower than many companies and the government had hoped. That has led some automakers to pursue hybrids and plug-in hybrids as transitional models before pushing buyers into EVs.


Though Europe is still far ahead of the U.S. in its push to go electric, leaders on the continent have made concessions that could allow internal combustion vehicles to use synthetic fuels. At the same time, the U.S. could pull back some of its pressure on electrification as automakers push back on rules that could force billions in investments without a guarantee that people will buy the vehicles once they’re here.


This all illustrates the potentially extended roadmap the world faces in cutting fossil fuels. While I agree that electrification is a necessary step to cutting tailpipe emissions, I also know that charging is a pain, the cars are too expensive, and dealer employees don’t know enough about them to educate buyers properly. So, while BMW’s reported decision might raise some eyebrows in Europe, it’s welcome news here.


[Image: BMW]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 9 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Mar 11, 2024

    Yes, there's an expense involvd with two power trains, but the US market is too big to give up on ICE. Besides, they'll make up the extra costs with their options packages: You want the steering wheel included? That's extra.

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Mar 11, 2024

    Sorry, I was staring at your kidneys. What?

  • CEastwood I have a friend who drives an early aughts Forrester who refuses to get rid of it no matter all it's problems . I believe it's the head gasket eater edition . He takes great pains regularly putting in some additive that is supposed prevent head gasket problems only to be told by his mechanic on the latest timing belt change that the heads are staring to seep . Mechanics must love making money off those cars and their flawed engine design . Below is another satisfied customer of what has to be one of the least reliable Japanese cars .https://www.theautopian.com/i-regret-buying-a-new-subaru/
  • Wjtinfwb 157k is not insignificant, even for a Honda. A lot would depend on the maintenance records and the environment the car was operated in. Up to date maintenance and updated wear items like brakes, shocks, belts, etc. done recently? Where did those 157k miles accumulate? West Texas on open, smooth roads that are relatively easy on the chassis or Michigan, with bomb crater potholes, snow and salt that take their toll on the underpinnings. That Honda 4 will run forever with decent maintenance but the underneath bits deteriorate on a Honda just like they do on a Chevy.
  • Namesakeone Yes, for two reasons: The idea of a robot making decisions based on algorithms does not seem to be in anyone's best interest, and the thought of trucking companies salivating over using a computer to replace the salary of a human driver means a lot more people in the unemployment lines.
  • Bd2 Powertrain reliability of Boxer engines is always questionable. I'll never understand why Subaru held onto them for so long. Smartstream is a solid engine platform as is the Veracruz 3.8L V6.
  • SPPPP I suppose I am afraid of autonomous cars in a certain sense. I prefer to drive myself when I go places. If I ride as a passenger in another driver's car, I can see if that person looks alert and fit for purpose. If that person seems likely to crash, I can intervene, and attempt to bring them back to attention. If there is no human driver, there will probably be no warning signs of an impending crash.But this is less significant than the over-arching fear of humans using autonomous driving as a tool to disempower and devalue other humans. As each generation "can't be trusted" with more and more things, we seem to be turning more passive and infantile. I fear that it will weaken our society and make it more prone to exploitation from within, and/or conquest from the outside.
Next