Ferrari Patents Augmented Reality System Designed to Merge Real and Virtual Racing

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Ferrari has filed a patent with the United States Patent and Trademark Office that leverages augmented reality to allow real-world racing to crossover into the virtual realm. By using wireless networks and the real vehicle’s positional data, Ferrari thinks it can replicate it on screens at home with a high degree of accuracy.

But the really slick stuff comes into play once that experience is replicated the other way round. The special interface device the automaker has filed its patent for also replicates virtual vehicles competing against it via an advanced head-up display (HUD) and some feedback features made possible by electronic controls.


With modern vehicles lacking direct, physical connections between controls and the relevant systems, Ferrari can have real vehicles bumping into virtual ones and responding accordingly. All the individual components required to make something like this possible already exist. The company would simply need to develop the necessary software allowing the above to happen in a manner that wouldn’t be unsafe.


While electronic controls do offer simplified vehicle architectures, adaptive levels of performance, and novel concepts like what we’re talking about here, serious drivers have bemoaned the lack of feedback they offer. Electronic brakes have to simulate pedal feel, making it difficult to anticipate brake fade. Electronic steering has to simulate resistance and feedback from the road, making it harder to understand how the vehicle is actually responding to your inputs. But they’re absolutely necessary if you want to create a virtual analog of a real-world vehicle.


Though just knowing that connected cars can be controlled in this manner does open up a lot of questions about security. Considering that Ferrari’s idea would also allow the computer system to “bump” a physical vehicle based on virtual inputs from someone operating remotely, one wonders how that could be misused by bad actors.



Based on reporting from CarBuzz, Ferrari hasn’t yet reached the point where it will need to address those issues. For now, it just wants to ensure it owns the rights to the relevant concept.


From CarBuzz:


Whether via a 3D model or render, the driver of the road car will be able to see a projection of the virtual car as if it were on the track alongside them. The design goes so far as to project the virtual vehicle in the road car's wing mirror if its position is behind the road car.
If contact occurs between the road car and the virtual car, the driver of the road car will sense this via haptic feedback in the seat or steering wheel. Depending on where the contact takes place, the driver of the real car will even feel a deflection in the vehicle's trajectory, as if actual physical contact between two cars has occurred.
The real-time data transfer will likely be one of the greatest challenges for this invention to work, with Ferrari mentioning 5G and even 6G connectivity and a latency of under 500 milliseconds.
The competing driver sitting in front of their gaming console will perceive the real car as a virtual competitor, even though it's a real car being driven in real time. Although it all sounds quite complex, the basic technologies are already in place to make such a racing method plausible, and other manufacturers have also dabbled in virtual reality high-performance driving.


It’s not a terrible idea. BMW floated a similar concept with its ///M Mixed Reality that uses goggles to add virtual obstacles and imagery to people driving on real tracks. Audi and Porsche (along with a few other brands) have also toyed with using vehicle controls and headsets for racing games to be played inside a stationary vehicle.


Ferrari’s concept just takes things a bit further and presumably dumps the clunky headgear. It’s hoping to leverage the tech to enhance the ownership experience and bolster its community. The company notes in its patent filing that most of its customers aren’t professional racing drivers and aren’t likely to qualify for a lot of events or even have the time to schedule regular track days.


This limits competition, which Ferrari believes is important. But the patent is supposed to create opportunities for friends to race together more often while also giving everyone a little extra practice.


It’s not uncommon for driving enthusiasts to overestimate their skill level behind the wheel, especially on vehicles they have limited experience with. We want to believe climbing into the cockpit of an absolute monster of a car will translate into a driving display so good that onlookers cannot help but weep. But the reality is that you need to familiarize yourself with the vehicle as much as the roads you’ll be driving on.


Unfortunately, that can be exceedingly difficult when the car in question boasts an extremely high performance threshold that can’t be touched anywhere outside of a racetrack. Ferrari knows this and is hoping to create more opportunities to give its customers and their friends those kinds of experiences.

It’s something that certainly would have seemed like a stupid gimmick a decade earlier. However, we know that modern racing simulators have reached a point where there is some very real skill overlap taking place. It’s literally the plot of the 2023 Gran Turismo film, which is based on a true story where Nissan used the titular racing sim to help fill the roster of its professional driving team.


What Ferrari wants is to utilize those advanced racing rigs automotive enthusiasts already have in their homes to bridge and bring them into real-world events that are happening in real time.


Assuming it works as intended, the implications of this technology could be massive. While I wouldn’t call any of the people I know with a Ferrari in the garage my friend, I could see myself strapping in at home to virtually compete in televised motorsport events and even paying extra for the privilege.


We actually kind of saw this happening when racing was stopped during the pandemic. With tracks closed, drivers used home simulators to keep their skills sharp and it wasn’t long before they were competing in events with random strangers over the internet. Motorsport organizers are likewise constantly seeking new ways of engaging the audience and the above seems like an idyllic solution — especially if they’re hoping to snag younger people.


It’ll be exciting to see if this patent filing turns into something tangible. While all the individual components seem to be there, it’s often easier said than done to bring it all together. However, Ferrari has some very exciting ideas that could fundamentally change how we experience motorsport.


[Images: USPTO; Ferrari]



Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Sep 28, 2023

    "augmented reality" Isn't that a mamoplasty?

  • El scotto El scotto on Sep 28, 2023

    Ferrari develops a way to put a virtual car in real time traffic? Will it be multiple virtual players in a possible infinite number of real drivers in real time situations?


    This will be one of the greatest things ever or a niche video game.

  • TheMrFreeze The American auto industry is the last large vestige of our once great industrial power...a nation like ours NEEDS industrial power of this type to survive. Case in point, at the beginning of the pandemic, when PPE and ventilators were desperately needed and our only source was China, it was the US automakers who quickly pivoted to start manufacturing them. No other industry in this country has the skill or manufacturing capabilities to do that.When you take this into consideration, plus the fact that Chinese automakers are financially supported by the CCP while US automakers function as fully free market entities, I have zero problem with a huge tariff being placed on Chinese vehicles to level the playing field. I do think, however, that the government then has the right to "remind" the Big 3 that it's now up to them to provide the affordable vehicles to fill the void the Chinese would have filled.
  • Fahrvergnugen Don't knock the Chinese so loudly. They are listening, and reading everything, keeping Naughty and Nice lists.
  • Redapple2 2026 f1 cars. Even more crappie! Tune in!F1 is crap. Garbage racing.1 must use 2 types of tires2 cant refuel3 DRS - only in certain places. in certain situations. on certain days of the week. and.... 4 same team wins 90% of races.Go IMSA !!!! or Moto GPPS- Historic Monaco races last weekend were spectacular. All 10 hr on TV.
  • Redapple2 volume meets or exceeds expectations......................... But, they always give you high annual volume to quote so they get a cheaper price. You have to tool up to that volume (costing you extra$) because if that part number reaches that volume and you cant meet it? Whao unto you. After getting burned by gm 10 yrs ago, we moved to heavy truck and agriculture products only. Steady volumes. More profits. 30 net payment. The vampire is up to 90-120 days now? Never big 3 work. Ever !
  • Tedward I was hypothetically annoyed about this until it happened to my wife. Watching her face twist into disbelieving rage once she realized that gm had sold her data to an insurance company after buying a very nice Cadillac was an eye opener though. If anyone wants a peek at the reputational damage done look at her. GM turned a manual BW purchase (and she's head over heels in love with it) into a non event as far as recos and future purchase considerations go. That's a heavy lift. I mean, she'd buy another manual BW, but there's zero talk about gm cars in general coming from her, in stark contrast to her VW love while she had her gti.
Next