Hagerty's 2024 Bull Market List Has a Few Surprises

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Hagerty recently released the seventh installment of its annual Bull Market List, and while this year’s picks are mostly predictable, there are a few interesting surprises. The company’s list highlights cars that it feels are set to grow in value over the next few years, with some exotics and classics and a growing number of “Rad Era” cars every year.


Hagerty’s 2024 list includes:

·     1997-2002 Plymouth Prowler

·     1964-1966 Ford Thunderbird

·     1981-1986 Jeep CJ-8 Scrambler

·     1965-1970 Chevrolet Impala SS

·     2000-2005 Jaguar XKR

·     2011-2016 Ferrari FF

·     1997-1999 Mitsubishi Pajero Evolution

·     2008-2013 BMW M3

·     1946-1950 Chrysler Town & Country

·     1989 Lamborghini Countach 25th Anniversary


A few of those are “duh” entries on the list, but the Prowler is kind of a dark horse. We’ve come full circle with cars like the Plymouth, reaching a point where it’s become cool unironically. The Pajero Evo is a cool choice as this year’s lone JDM entry, but it’s been aggressively climbing in price for a while now.


Hagerty’s list is meant to highlight cars that can be good values with enough research and time on the purchase side. It says it does not mean to celebrate inflated values or make specific models more expensive than they already are. Besides, as Hagerty notes, fun should be the primary goal with car buying, not necessarily making money.


[Image: Dave Goodman via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 24 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Dec 27, 2023

    I'm not surprised seeing the Scrambler added to the list. Jeeps haven't come close to reached Bronco pricing which is nice for shade tree builders.

  • MRF 95 T-Bird MRF 95 T-Bird on Dec 28, 2023

    @Art_Vandelay

    I owned a 95 LX with the 4.6 modular from 2007 until late 2019. It was a nice driving and handling car that was quite reliable with normal maintenance. Probably one of the best vehicles I owned, though my previous 87 Thunderbird was quite solid. I sold it and upgraded to a leftover 2018 Dodge Challenger GT awd.

    • See 2 previous
    • Art_Vandelay Art_Vandelay on Dec 30, 2023

      Solid choice IMHO for that role. It was really the last car like it made.



  • MacTassos Bagpipes. And loud ones at that.Bagpipes for back up warning sounds.Bagpipes for horns.Bagpipes for yellow light warning alert and louder bagpipes for red light warnings.Bagpipes for drowsy driver alerts.Bagpipes for using your phone while driving.Bagpipes for following too close.Bagpipes for drifting out of your lane.Bagpipes for turning without signaling.Bagpipes for warning your lights are off when driving at night.Bagpipes for not coming to a complete stop at a stop sign.Bagpipes for seat belts not buckled.Bagpipes for leaving the iron on when going on vacation. I’ll ne’er make that mistake agin’.
  • TheEndlessEnigma I would mandate the elimination of all autonomous driving tech in automobiles. And specifically for GM....sorry....gm....I would mandate On Star be offered as an option only.Not quite the question you asked but.....you asked.
  • MaintenanceCosts There's not a lot of meat to this (or to an argument in the opposite direction) without some data comparing the respective frequency of "good" activations that prevent a collision and false alarms. The studies I see show between 25% and 40% reduction in rear-end crashes where AEB is installed, so we have one side of that equation, but there doesn't seem to be much if any data out there on the frequency of false activations, especially false activations that cause a collision.
  • Zerocred Automatic emergency braking scared the hell out of me. I was coming up on a line of stopped cars that the Jeep (Grand Cherokee) thought was too fast and it blared out an incredibly loud warbling sound while applying the brakes. I had the car under control and wasn’t in danger of hitting anything. It was one of those ‘wtf just happened’ moments.I like adaptive cruise control, the backup camera and the warning about approaching emergency vehicles. I’m ambivalent  about rear cross traffic alert and all the different tones if it thinks I’m too close to anything. I turned off lane keep assist, auto start-stop, emergency backup stop. The Jeep also has automatic parking (parallel and back in), which I’ve never used.
  • MaintenanceCosts Mandatory speed limiters.Flame away - I'm well aware this is the most unpopular opinion on the internet - but the overwhelming majority of the driving population has not proven itself even close to capable of managing unlimited vehicles, and it's time to start dealing with it.Three important mitigations have to be in place:(1) They give 10 mph grace on non-limited-access roads and 15-20 on limited-access roads. The goal is not exact compliance but stopping extreme speeding.(2) They work entirely locally, except for downloading speed limit data for large map segments (too large to identify with any precision where the driver is). Neither location nor speed data is ever uploaded.(3) They don't enforce on private property, only on public roadways. Race your track cars to your heart's content.
Next