Ford Trademarks ‘Lightstream’ Name, Could Portend Performance Truck

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Eagle-eyed fans of the Blue Oval brand have spied a new trademark filing, one which could hold promise for a future performance – street or off-road – variant of the Lightning pickup truck.


Showing up in government docs as the Lightstream, the word certainly doesn’t mean much in a vacuum. And, as we all know, car companies tend to trademark both names and product ideas all the time – few of which ever see the light of day. Sometimes this is to guard and protect an idea or innovation while other times it is to misdirect its competition (and media, it must be said).


Nevertheless, it’s an open secret that Ford would like to introduce different variants of the Lightning, including high performance model (as if 775 lb-ft of torque in a pickup isn’t enough) and an off-road beast. The latter, with knobby tires and lifted ride height, would surely play hell with official range estimates but the specter of a well-balanced Lightning tearing across desert dunes or doing all-wheel drive burnouts on a dry lakebed are too good not to mention.


It is this writer’s opinion that the Raptor designation would be a natural fit for such shenanigans, especially given all of the positive equity built up in that sub-brand. With the name spreading from the F-150 to the Bronco and now to its Ranger cousin, introducing it on the Lightning would be a logical step. And it’s not like Ford is afraid to court controversy with naming conventions – look at the ire they raised with the Mustang Mach-E. They're also not above making dad jokes, as proven by recently introducing the Lightning Flash.


The application for Lightstream was made in late November, suggesting at least someone at the Glass House has this thing at part of what is surely a too-long PowerPoint presentation. As for the filing itself, it unhelpfully describes the terms usage as relating to “Motor vehicles, namely, passenger automobiles, four-wheeled motor vehicles, sport utility vehicles, off-road vehicles, electrically powered motor vehicles, structural parts and fittings therefor.”


Again, that’s boilerplate stuff to throw us all off the scent of what they’re actually planning.


We’ll keep our ears to the ground and an eye on the forums for more details.


[Image: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 23 comments
  • Mike-NB2 Mike-NB2 on Dec 06, 2023

    See? This is what I have been saying all along. This is what Ford needs. They need more trucks! There is room between the Maverick and the Ranger for at least two new platforms, and probably three between the Ranger and the F-150. And what about a truck between the F-150 and the Super Duty? Surely there is room for one more? And trims? Yes!! Hundreds of trims! Ford needs to be more creative with trims. Remember the Levis trimmed Jeeps from way back? Well Ford, how about a "Kirkland Jeans" trim? Cool! Put a price of $80,000 on it and you'll sell every one you can build. Ford, you can have that idea for free. It's just one of many I have. Contact me for more.


    What people are clamoring for are more trucks in the $60,000 to $100,000 range. Dealers can't get enough of them!

    • See 1 previous
    • Mike-NB2 Mike-NB2 on Dec 07, 2023

      SCE - I don't dispute that. If people assess their 'needs' and come up with a truck so be it.


  • El scotto El scotto on Dec 07, 2023

    A Ford Maverick Lightsabre! May the G-Force be with you! No Jedi mind tricks, just instant torque. These aren't the ICEs you're looking for.

  • Michael Gallagher Some math! The cost to produce US Shale derived oil is between $35 to $55/bbl. Middle East oil cost about $15/bbl. If OPEC wanted, they could produce more , driving oil prices below our costs and decimating our domestic industry. We have whispered in their ear that they should endeavor to keep the price above our cost, in exchange for political, economic and security favors. Case in point, during COVID when gas dropped below $2/gal , producers were losing money, Trump had to approach the Saudis requesting them to cut production to raise the oil price above our cost. If the global oil industry was truly competitive, our industry would be out of business very quickly due to our much higher cost of production. Those that long for those covid prices need to realize it would be at the expense of our domestic industry.
  • Norman Stansfield I'm training to be a mechanic, and have been told this or a Harley would be a good start.
  • SilverHawk I watch out of loyalty to the sport even though it's often not as entertaining these days. But then, you have a race like Miami that gives us a driver's first win and my enthusiasm is refreshed. Congrats to Lando.
  • Oberkanone Nope. No interest.
  • SilverCoupe Tim, you don't always watch F1 as you don't want to lose sleep? But these races are great for putting one to sleep!I kid (sort of). I DVR them, I watch them, I fast forward a lot. It was great to see Lando win one, I've been a fan of McLaren since their heyday in CanAm in the late '60's.
Next