Report: The Next-Gen BMW M3 Will Land with Electric and ICE Powertrains

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

BMW has aggressive electrification plans, but the automaker isn’t taking its eye off the internal combustion ball. A new report from BMW Blog states that BMW is planning a next-generation M3 between 2027 and 2028 that will land with gas and electric configurations.


BMW Blog noted that BMW will release the next-gen gas-powered G84 M3 with an electric M3 wearing the internal chassis code ZA0. The publication said that BMW would likely continue using the S58 inline-six for the next-gen cars and that the current car would be getting a facelift later this year.


While these are just reports, and BMW could change anything (or everything) between now and the car’s eventual release, the change in strategy aligns with shifts we’ve seen in the auto market over the last year. Demand for EVs is growing, but slower than many companies and the government had hoped. That has led some automakers to pursue hybrids and plug-in hybrids as transitional models before pushing buyers into EVs.


Though Europe is still far ahead of the U.S. in its push to go electric, leaders on the continent have made concessions that could allow internal combustion vehicles to use synthetic fuels. At the same time, the U.S. could pull back some of its pressure on electrification as automakers push back on rules that could force billions in investments without a guarantee that people will buy the vehicles once they’re here.


This all illustrates the potentially extended roadmap the world faces in cutting fossil fuels. While I agree that electrification is a necessary step to cutting tailpipe emissions, I also know that charging is a pain, the cars are too expensive, and dealer employees don’t know enough about them to educate buyers properly. So, while BMW’s reported decision might raise some eyebrows in Europe, it’s welcome news here.


[Image: BMW]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 9 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Mar 11, 2024

    Yes, there's an expense involvd with two power trains, but the US market is too big to give up on ICE. Besides, they'll make up the extra costs with their options packages: You want the steering wheel included? That's extra.

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Mar 11, 2024

    Sorry, I was staring at your kidneys. What?

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next