BMW Teases M5 Wagon Hinted for American Market

by Matt Posky

Published: June 27th, 2023

bmw teases m5 wagon hinted for american market

BMW has been teasing the next-generation M5, specifically the long-roof wagon variant known as the M5 Touring.

This is a little odd. While European sport wagons were once relatively popular in the United States, it has become increasingly rare to see them migrating beyond the home market. But there are rumors that the be-hatched M5 will be sold stateside, enthralling automotive enthusiasts that we can only hope are genuinely interested in buying a few.

When crossovers started to become popular, some driving devotees fell into a deep depression as the automotive world had stopped making sense. However, whenever there’s another sporty wagon on the horizon, hope returns and the future looks a little brighter.

While some of the earliest crossovers boasted superior off-road capabilities, many were little more than lifted versions of station wagons. Later examples were basically softened SUVs and the entire segment fell into this weird place where the perception of ruggedness became more relevant than what the vehicles could actually do. Meanwhile, driving dynamics fell into the toilet as cars continued getting heavier and the typical crossover ride dictated a higher center of gravity.

That’s not to suggest crossovers don’t have their place. With North American potholes getting deeper every single year, purchasing an automobile with some added suspension travel might not be the worst idea. There are even a few crossovers that are fun to drive (e.g. Mazda CX-30 or Hyundai Kona N). But the really practical ones tend to be a bit of a snooze and wagons manage to blend versatility without sacrificing on-road dynamics a much better. This concept is exactly what the M5 Touring will be chasing down, adding performance until the wagon is teetering on the edge of insanity.

BMW has only released camouflage photos of the prototype, so there’s a limited amount of information to be gleaned until the manufacturer starts releasing spec sheets. But the car will undoubtedly ride on the same platform that’s being used for the all-new 5 Series G61 wagon and receive a host of upgrades to ensure it’s a real monster.

Teaser photos show the car getting some fender flares (guaranteeing a wider track) and a quad exhaust setup (indicating a juicier motor). The M5 also seems to boast a set of reasonably thick Michelin Pilot Sport tires to help maximize grip.

With the brand having already confirmed that M5 models will utilize a hybrid powertrain, everyone seems to be expecting the model to adopt the 4.4-liter V8 found in the hideous BMW XM. As a plug-in hybrid, the SUV boasts a combined 738 horsepower and 738 pound-feet of torque in its top trim. While the base XM produces a more modest 644 horsepower, rumors have suggested that the M5 will launch with at least 700 hp.

While the 2024 5 Series has entered production, details on the M5 sedan are yet to arrive and BMW suggested we’ll have to wait until 2024 to see the M5 wagon released. Your author is just glad that there will be alternatives to the Mercedes-AMG E63 S Wagon, Porsche Panamera Turbo S Sport Turismo, and Audi RS6 Avant. Though it would still be nice if there were a manufacturer out there interested in building a hardcore sport wagon for under $100,000.

[Images: BMW]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#NewsBlog #Teasers #BMW #M5 #Touring #Wagon

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 20 comments

Dukeisduke on Jun 28, 2023

This got a mention from Sean McElroy yesterday, on Autoline Daily.

Like Reply
Stuki Moi on Jun 29, 2023

Since overpriced 700hp toys barely able to bridge neighbouring gas stations in the US, are such poster children for the utility of wagons and all......

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?