Report: Toyota Boosts Wages Ahead of UAW Ratification Votes

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While the United Automobile Workers (UAW) are preparing to vote on contract proposals offered by Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis, non-union Toyota is increasing hourly wages. Hourly compensation has increased for the automaker’s U.S. manufacturing, distribution center, and logistics employees. It’s also offering more paid time off than before and reducing the time it takes for workers to reach top-tier compensation.

Considering Toyota had already issued two pay bumps for 2023, seeing a third is a bit of a surprise and likely has everything to do with the results of the UAW strike.


Based on reporting from Automotive News, it even looks like Toyota may have been bench-marking the new union contracts. Hourly wages are coming up a little more than 9 percent, resulting in a payment scheme that will look similar to what the domestic brands are offering when it goes into effect at the start of 2024.


From Automotive News:


The third increase, which goes into effect Jan. 1, was announced just over a month after Toyota raised wages 25 cents an hour to $31.86 for its production workers, effective Sept. 25.
The $2.94 raise announced Tuesday for production and other hourly employees is unusual in that the Japanese automaker typically increases wages twice a year. The raise amounts to a 9.2 percent increase for top-tier hourly employees above the wages Toyota put into effect Sept. 25.
The raise comes as the UAW reached tentative agreements with the Detroit 3 on lucrative new contracts. As to whether there is a direct causal link, the spokesman referred to a written statement from Chris Reynolds, executive vice president for corporate resources at Toyota Motor North America.


Skilled trades employees are said to be eligible for up to $43.20 an hour. That’s $3.70 more than the previous arrangement that went into action on September 25th. Wage progression has likewise been made shorter, now taking just four years (rather than eight) for new employees to reach the upper echelons of the payment pyramid.


"At Toyota, we take great pride in showing respect for people. We value our employees and their contributions, and we show it by offering robust compensation packages that we continually review to ensure that we remain competitive within the automotive industry," a Toyota spokesperson stated.


[Image: Toyota]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 76 comments
  • Wjtinfwb Wjtinfwb on Nov 02, 2023

    Very disingenuous reply. The only reason OPEC and exports of oil have affected oil prices is we’re no longer producing a surplus of oil that meets 100% of the US’s oil needs as well as a surplus we can export after US requirements are met. Our ability to export excess oil created a surplus of oil in the global market driving down the price. Once that surplus was eliminated through the Biden Administration policies, the glut dried up and prices rose. We still export, at our own peril, to stabilize the global market and provide an alternative to Russian production, which would enhance their economy and further fund their war on Ukraine. Our reduced production capacity reduced supply which Abe economist would tell you will drive up prices unless demand is reduced by a commensurate amount. Right?

  • Kcflyer Kcflyer on Nov 02, 2023

    Trump dumps trillions in the money supply to feed hungry pols on his way out. Biden dumps trillions more on his way in to feed same scum. Three years later the price of everything we buy in the U.S. is up 30 to 200 percent. But yeah, inflation was caused by wage increases.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next