Tesla Wildly Overestimated Range and Turned Deaf Ear to Complaints, Allege Reuters

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

It will surprise precisely zero of our readers to learn that some carmakers apply optimistic range estimates to their electric vehicles. Prior to EVs taking the stage, it also wasn’t uncommon – especially prior to changes in methods at the EPA – for cars with internal combustion powertrains to bear outsized fuel economy ratings thanks to twisted testing protocols.


But, if allegations by Reuters are correct, Tesla went further than that. A lot further.


According to the investigative report, Tesla allegedly not only overstated the total all-electric driving range of their cars but created a so-called ‘Diversion Team’ whose task was to cancel service appointments related to range complaints. If reports are correct, workers assigned to this team would apparently celebrate each cancelled appointment with applause and the striking of a xylophone, prompting this author to see images of Glengarry Glen Ross or Wolf of Wall Street environments flash in front of his eyes. Or Section 31 from Star Trek, your call.


Interviews conducted with people purportedly holding in-the-know information about this ‘Diversion Team’ office describe activities which may make even those fictional characters blush. It is said the crew had a target of closing 750 cases per week, with agents at one point instructed to call a complainant once and close the case if there was no answer. Given wide swaths of the general public tend not to pick up calls from unknown numbers, this ratio was surely quite high. 


Further, it is reported that agents were told to stop running remote diagnostics on vehicles belonging to complainants. It is alleged thousands of customers were told their car was fine by workers who had not performed any diagnostics. Sounds like the bad old days of bringing yer faulty car to a dealership only to be told “that’s normal”. If true, perhaps there’s a lot more of overlap between Tesla and the worst characteristics of legacy automakers than fanboys would like to think.


The whole investigation is detailed at this link and is worth a read. To be sure, many EV makers are often accused of exaggerated claims when it comes to driving range – but the level of subterfuge seemingly uncovered here is quite damning. 


[Image: Tesla]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 98 comments
  • Zerofoo Zerofoo on Jul 28, 2023

    I work with quite a few Tesla owners. Precisely zero of them care about the car's range limitations. They are all used as commuter cars and they charge at home.


    That's the circumstance where most EVs work well. All of my Tesla-owning co-workers also have access to multiple ICE cars as well.


    What the EV manufacturers are learning is that pretty much every commuter who can charge at home, and can afford the EV premium, has already bought an EV. These customers were the low-hanging fruit. Additional sales will be much harder to get.


    Unless a massive public-charger build-out happens in the next year, or battery technology undergoes a revolutionary technical improvement, EV sales will continue to be flat for some time.


    EVs require very little maintenance and if the batteries last, there is little reason to replace an EV bought in the last 5-7 years.


    I predict lots of cash on the hoods of EVs very soon.

    • See 1 previous
    • SPPPP SPPPP on Jul 31, 2023

      "I predict lots of cash on the hoods of EVs very soon." Well, the government already put $7500 tax credit on the hood of every domestic EV. The next part of the plan is to increase the fines and compliance costs on the hood of all the ICEs, to make the EVs look better by comparison. It's already under way - see the story about GM raising objections to the next round of CAFE standards.


  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jul 29, 2023

    "Managers told the employees that they were saving Tesla about $1,000 for every canceled appointment, the people said. Another goal was to ease the pressure on service centers, some of which had long waits for appointments."

    The Truth: We're in startup mode; some customers have Real Issues Which Need Fixing, and you want me to spend my limited time holding hands with Nervous Nellie and Leadfoot Larry? Their vehicles are in spec; nothing to be done. Next.

    This is called "good business."

  • SaulTigh In the mid-90's I worked with a guy that drove a mid-80's T-Bird with the Essex V6. Paint was peeling and it literally didn't have an interior any longer (headliner and door panels were flat GONE, with just a crank and handle sticking out). Guy commuted about 30 miles a day and the thing would not die.He then got a much newer Pontiac and parked that T-bird under a tree. A year later, the Pontiac got totaled and he went out and put the jumper cables on that T-bird and it fired right up. Drove it another 2 years before sending it to the crusher. Impressive roach-osity for a domestic ride from that era.
  • Tassos Jong-iL I have many bad days, and wish my car would deal with my enemies for me. So yes please "gm" deliver this technology to One Korea.
  • MaintenanceCosts How about a system that detects when a driver is starting to engage in road rage and just backs off and drives smoothly for a bit?
  • IBx1 ST is dead so why not kill GR toopathetic automatic scum
  • VoGhost Interesting. The maga anti-America crowd is so used to being brainwashed into hating Tesla, they didn't realize that it's actually the foreign automakers that use slave labor.
Next