Florida Governor Ron DeSantis Signs Bill Blocking Most Direct-to-Consumer Auto Sales

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Dealer franchise laws are controversial at best and downright divisive in most cases, but they remain a significant force in the automotive industry despite the political noise surrounding them. Florida governor and GOP presidential candidate Ron DeSantis recently joined the fray when he signed House Bill 637, legislation that blocks direct auto sales for most brands but not all. 


As Inside EVs pointed out, the bill’s language prohibits direct-to-consumer sales by automakers. However, those that don’t already have existing franchise agreements can, so brands like Tesla, Rivian, Lucid, and others. While that won’t be a significant change from the current automotive retail situation, the law could give those automakers a competitive advantage over legacy companies, as it lets them sell vehicles at lower prices without covering dealers’ overhead.


Calls to revise or nix dealer franchise laws have become louder recently, as car buyers have felt the wrath of inflation, supply chain shortages, and extreme demand for some models. Those conditions have given dealers an open door to raise prices on new and used vehicles, which has led some to question why automakers can’t bypass dealers and sell directly to consumers.


Dealer franchise laws prevent that in most cases. They are designed to protect buyers, and the National Auto Dealers Association (NADA) notes that they can also benefit manufacturers. While those claims are open to debate, the net effect on the average car buyer is that the choice is to buy from an established auto brand at a dealership or buy from an upstart EV company at a direct store.


There’s certainly a case to be made that local dealers play an important role in service and product support. Still, the remote service and mostly digital support programs offered by companies like Rivian have earned relatively solid reviews, and the brands’ customers are among the happiest respondents in surveys. 


[Image: Hunter Crenian via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Any carmaker that wants to sell direct-to-customer just has to create a new brand that only sells direct-to-customer.

    There are so many idiots in politics, probably because any sane person would know better than to enter politics. In Florida it's worse - any sane person would stay the hell away from that state.

  • Paul Paul on Nov 27, 2023

    Consumer's opinion in the matter counts for NADA.

  • Master Baiter I thought we wanted high oil prices to reduce consumption, to save the planet from climate change. Make up your minds, Democrats.
  • Teddyc73 Oh look dull grey with black wheels. How original.
  • Teddyc73 "Matte paint looks good on this car." No it doesn't. It doesn't look good on any car. From the Nissan Versa I rented all the up to this monstrosity. This paint trend needs to die before out roads are awash with grey vehicles with black wheels. Why are people such lemmings lacking in individuality? Come on people, embrace color.
  • Flashindapan Will I miss the Malibu, no. Will I miss one less midsize sedan that’s comfortable, reliable and reasonably priced, yes.
  • Theflyersfan I used to love the 7-series. One of those aspirational luxury cars. And then I parked right next to one of the new ones just over the weekend. And that love went away. Honestly, if this is what the Chinese market thinks is luxury, let them have it. Because, and I'll be reserved here, this is one butt-ugly, mutha f'n, unholy trainwreck of a design. There has to be an excellent car under all of the grotesque and overdone bodywork. What were they thinking? Luxury is a feeling. It's the soft leather seats. It's the solid door thunk. It's groundbreaking engineering (that hopefully holds up.) It's a presence that oozes "I have arrived," not screaming "LOOK AT ME EVERYONE!!!" The latter is the yahoo who just won $1,000,000 off of a scratch-off and blows it on extra chrome and a dozen light bars on a new F150. It isn't six feet of screens, a dozen suspension settings that don't feel right, and no steering feel. It also isn't a design that is going to be so dated looking in five years that no one is going to want to touch it. Didn't BMW learn anything from the Bangle-butt backlash of 2002?
Next