UAW Expands Strike Again, Targeting GM's Largest Plant

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Just one day after the UAW went on strike at Stellantis’ pickup factory in Sterling Heights, roughly 5,000 union members walked off the line at General Motors’ plant in Arlington, Texas. The UAW is now targeting automaker’s most-profitable facilities, with Tuesday’s walkout suggesting that the industrial game of chicken could be nearing its final act.


The union has been gradually ramping up pressure to prolong its own strike budget. But targeting domestic automaker’s valuable truck and SUV plants represents a major escalation in tactics. UAW President Shawn Fain threatened more walkouts last week in the hope that it would encourage automakers to tailor their proposed deals to align more closely with union demands. But he has also hinted that a deal may soon be reached.


Meanwhile, industry leaders have used the media to spread a message that their companies cannot give the UAW what it wants without jeopardizing subsequent investments or potentially endangering the financial health of the business. General Motors CEO Mary Barra recently said her company has already made an unprecedented offer and would refuse to agree to a contract that jeopardizes the company’s future.


Arlington Assembly is responsible for profitable models like the Chevrolet Tahoe, Chevy Suburban, GMC Yukon, and Cadillac Escalade.


The walkout came immediately after General Motors issued its earnings report, with the company announcing a net profit of just over $3 billion for the quarter. While that’s down 7 percent from the previous year, leadership said it felt confident about strong vehicle demand and pricing that would ensure desirable margins.


Fain said that GM’s offer still lags behind Ford by preserving a two-tier wage structure and offering the weakest 401(k) contributions of all three companies — hence the UAW targeting Arlington. 


Barra’s statements after news broke about the strike expansion echo her earlier position. “Accepting unsustainably high costs would put our future and GM team member jobs at risk, and jeopardizing our future is something I will not do,” the CEO said.  


It’s hard to know who to feel sorry for, let alone who might be telling the truth. 


Domestic automakers have enjoyed record-setting profits in recent years after culling small, affordable models from their lineups. While some of this was done to help circumvent stringent regulatory laws that would have been expensive to comply with, we’re also living in an era where six-figure pickup trucks aren’t uncommon. Vehicle affordability is at an all-time low while the industry seems to have been thriving due to MSRPs being at an all-time high. Companies have also invested billions into electrification and automated driving programs over the past decade without either resulting in reliable profitability in themselves. 


Automakers have likewise laid off workers since the strike began, blaming the union walkouts for the job cuts. However, rolling layoffs have been relatively common since the turn of the last century. In 2000, there were roughly 300,000 domestic auto workers. But that number had plummeted to just 140,000 by 2009. 


While employment rose consistently in successive years, peaking at 240,000 domestic employees by 2019, layoffs have returned at a staggering pace. The pandemic pushed the workforce down to just 110,000 by the end of 2020. Many jobs returned as lockdowns ended. But we’re still nowhere near the number of positions that existed beforehand and the number of assembly jobs continues to shrink. 


On the other side of the fight, we unionized workers who have spent the last few decades giving up benefits as they watched executive compensation skyrocket in relation to their own. The wage gap between labor and management looks to have reached untenable proportions, encouraging the UAW to play hardball with an industry they previously made concessions to help save only to see more jobs migrating elsewhere. 


But the union has likewise endured some criticism for its past political allegiances and has a long history of corruption that today’s leadership is striving to get away from. Previous contract negotiations have indeed been undermined by former UAW leaders accepting bribes from the industry in exchange for favorable treatment — a wrong Fain said he’s committed to correcting while in charge of the organization.  


We’ll see how it all plays out in the coming weeks. In the meantime, the industry is going to do what it can to frame the UAW as greedy and endangering domestic production while also using the strike as an excuse to continue raising prices. However, the UAW’s actions do have consequences and will eventually reach a point where its strike budget runs out. One could argue the union is asking too much and will effectively encourage the industry to build more factories outside of the United States just as easily as they could claim that the UAW is fighting against nationwide wage stagnation created by greedy multinational businesses that only care about their shareholders.


[Image: UAW]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 64 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Oct 25, 2023

    More fallout:


    Ford offers unpaid leave to UAW factory workers at Louisville plant (freep.com)


    "Ford Motor Co. is offering workers personal unpaid leave from the Louisville Assembly Plant in Kentucky, which the UAW has said is directly affected by the strike at the nearby Kentucky Truck Plant, the Detroit Free Press has learned.


    In a labor relations bulletin to UAW members dated Oct. 20 and obtained by the Free Press, workers are told they may select a two-week period for unpaid leave with an application deadline of Oct. 25. They would not be eligible for unemployment payments.


    The Ford letter says the offer is open to final area assemblers only. The plant employs 3,227 hourly workers who build the Ford Escape and Lincoln Corsair, according to the Ford corporate website with plant information that was updated in mid-September."


  • Alan Alan on Oct 25, 2023

    My view is if the UAW were serious they would of stopped all vehicle production at the Big 2 and Stellantis. Not this half assed strike that is occurring.


    What is the inventory of vehicles that the Big 2 and Stellantis hold? In the olden days the corrupt Detroit manufacturers would organise via the corrupt UAW bosses strikes to allow for the reduction in inventories.

    Oh, the appearance of the UAW wanting a pay rise is a non argument. Because big pay rises are coming due to the high inflation over the past couple of years.



  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next