San Francisco Traffic Stands Still After Cruise AVs Stall in North Beach

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

With California having approved the contentious expansion of driverless robotaxis operating in San Francisco, autonomous test vehicles showed their readiness by stalling themselves in the middle of town. The situation reportedly wasn’t the result of local activists trying to disable the vehicles or cyber warfare, but rather the result of their having lost their internet connection for a few minutes.


According to the Los Angeles Times, nearly a dozen driverless vehicles operated by General Motors’ Cruise stopped late Friday night on Vallejo Street in the North Beach bar and restaurant district. Presumably there to snag some riders, the vehicles were unresponsive and ended up blocking traffic on San Francisco’s less-than-ample roads with their hazard lights on.


This left human drivers stuck behind the stalled AVs for roughly fifteen minutes, unable to find a way to get the self-driving vehicles moving again. However, they all suddenly came back to life after their nap and continued on as if nothing had happened.


From the LA Times:


The situation is loaded with irony, as the California Public Utilities Commission on Thursday voted 3 to 1 amid great public controversy to allow a massive robotaxi expansion. The vote allows General Motors-owned Cruise and Waymo, owned by Google’s Alphabet, to charge fares for driverless service and grow the fleet as large as they’d like. Cruise has said it plans eventually to deploy thousands of robotaxis in San Francisco.
City officials in San Francisco, from the mayor’s office down, have been fighting the move, with officials saying the robotaxi industry needs to fix problems that endanger the public first before further expanding the business. The city’s Fire Department has logged more than 55 cases of robotaxis interfering with first responders. Fire Chief Jeanine Nicholson has repeatedly said Cruise and Waymo are getting in firefighters’ way and their technology is “not ready for prime time.”
The CPUC decided to go ahead anyway. One of the three yes votes was cast by Commissioner John Reynolds, who served as head lawyer at Cruise before appointed to the CPUC by Gov. Gavin Newsom.
The no vote came from Commissioner Genevieve Shiroma, who said the companies should explain the problems and how they plan to fix them first.


Aaron Peskin, North Beach’s representative for the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, expressed his dismay regarding what might have happened if emergency services needed to get through the area while the vehicles were inoperable and incapable of even pulling off to the side of the road. He also noted that he was inundated with texts and emails where locals had filmed the empty cars blocking traffic.


Peskin reportedly reached out to Cruise government affairs manager Lauren Wilson late on Friday and was informed the following morning that cellular carriers had dropped the ball.


“As I understand it, outside lands impacted LTE cell connectivity and ability for RA advisors to route cars,” Wilson explained to him.


Outside Lands is a three-day music festival held in Golden Gate Park roughly four miles away. High usage at the event apparently left the North Beach without sufficient wireless connectivity and Cruise’s vehicles went dormant as a result.


Peskin has said local officials are doing whatever it takes to have the CPUC decision reversed, noting that they are currently discussing whether to seek a court injunction and whether or not to fine the companies whenever an autonomous test vehicle blocks traffic. He also told the outlet that CPUC and Governor Gavin Newsom (who appointed its members) were putting corporate money ahead of public safety.


“If you’re looking for an example of regulatory capture, you’re seeing it now,” Peskin explained. “It’s unethical and immoral but legal,” he continued. “Bottom line, this all goes to Gov. Gavin Christopher Newsom.”


While most of the incidents being cited by San Franciscan officials tend to be relatively minor, typically involving confused AVs clogging up construction zones or stopping abruptly near intersections. There have been collisions with trucks, buses, and a couple of fatal accidents involving dogs. A Cruise robotaxi even collided with a semi-truck on August 7th, which was just days before the California Public Utilities Commission voted to approve the expansion.


[Image: Cruise]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 40 comments
  • Lostjr Lostjr on Aug 19, 2023

    Two in one night.

    "A driverless Cruise car with a passenger inside collided with an emergency vehicle in San Francisco Thursday night, the company said.

    Shortly after 10 p.m., the driverless Cruise car, which had a green light, entered the intersection at Polk and Turk streets in the Tenderloin, the company wrote in a tweet Friday morning, and was hit by an emergency vehicle that was en route to an emergency scene. The company did not specify what type of emergency vehicle it was."

    ...

    This one is human caused, but another human driver might have seen it coming?

    "The same night, a Cruise car collided with another vehicle at 26th and Mission streets.

    The company said another driverless car, which had no passengers, entered the intersection on a green light when another car ran a red light at a high speed. The driverless car detected the other car and braked, according to Cruise, but the two cars still collided. The driver of the other car was treated and released at the scene and a police report has been filed, Cruise said."

    San Francisco Chronicle.

    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Aug 20, 2023

      I find that second one appealing in a way. Is this wrong of me?


  • JamesGarfield JamesGarfield on Sep 02, 2023

    This comes to mind:


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_(short_story)

  • TheMrFreeze The American auto industry is the last large vestige of our once great industrial power...a nation like ours NEEDS industrial power of this type to survive. Case in point, at the beginning of the pandemic, when PPE and ventilators were desperately needed and our only source was China, it was the US automakers who quickly pivoted to start manufacturing them. No other industry in this country has the skill or manufacturing capabilities to do that.When you take this into consideration, plus the fact that Chinese automakers are financially supported by the CCP while US automakers function as fully free market entities, I have zero problem with a huge tariff being placed on Chinese vehicles to level the playing field. I do think, however, that the government then has the right to "remind" the Big 3 that it's now up to them to provide the affordable vehicles to fill the void the Chinese would have filled.
  • Fahrvergnugen Don't knock the Chinese so loudly. They are listening, and reading everything, keeping Naughty and Nice lists.
  • Redapple2 2026 f1 cars. Even more crappie! Tune in!F1 is crap. Garbage racing.1 must use 2 types of tires2 cant refuel3 DRS - only in certain places. in certain situations. on certain days of the week. and.... 4 same team wins 90% of races.Go IMSA !!!! or Moto GPPS- Historic Monaco races last weekend were spectacular. All 10 hr on TV.
  • Redapple2 volume meets or exceeds expectations......................... But, they always give you high annual volume to quote so they get a cheaper price. You have to tool up to that volume (costing you extra$) because if that part number reaches that volume and you cant meet it? Whao unto you. After getting burned by gm 10 yrs ago, we moved to heavy truck and agriculture products only. Steady volumes. More profits. 30 net payment. The vampire is up to 90-120 days now? Never big 3 work. Ever !
  • Tedward I was hypothetically annoyed about this until it happened to my wife. Watching her face twist into disbelieving rage once she realized that gm had sold her data to an insurance company after buying a very nice Cadillac was an eye opener though. If anyone wants a peek at the reputational damage done look at her. GM turned a manual BW purchase (and she's head over heels in love with it) into a non event as far as recos and future purchase considerations go. That's a heavy lift. I mean, she'd buy another manual BW, but there's zero talk about gm cars in general coming from her, in stark contrast to her VW love while she had her gti.
Next