Mercedes-AMG Unveils New GLC Coupe

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Yes, we know – news of a crossover with ‘coupe-like’ styling isn’t likely to raise the pulse of many commenters, especially one painted approximately the same color as the pavement on which it is driven. The new GLC Coupe may be a stern German shown in a dour shade of paint, but its 671 horsepower and 752 lb-ft of torque make it anything but boring.


Billed as the brand’s “first performance hybrid SUV coupe”, the GLC 63 S E Performance Coupe does cut a handsome if immediately recognizable figure. Appending that five-letter word to its name ensures the thing has a lot more sport than utility thanks to its dramatic roofline which cuts sharply into cargo space compared to a normal GLC. Alert readers will have correctly determined there is some form of electrification under the hood, tipped off by the ‘E Performance’ moniker and the fact that just about everything introduced these days has some measure of juice on board.


In this example, the 63 variant combines a 2.0-liter turbo engine with an electric drive unit on the rear axle. This combo is good for the aforementioned 671 ponies and 752 lb-ft of twist and funnels its power through a nine-speed transmission and 4Matic all-wheel drive. If you care, the engine itself contributes 469 horses and 402 torques to this equation. Score one for its electric drive unit, though it is worth noting that buried in the bumf is a notation the electrified guts make their maximum grunt of 201hp for 10 seconds at a time; its continuous output is 107 horses. In other words, it seems like the GLC 63 S E Performance Coupe will belt out a total of 576 horsepower in most conditions, with the full-fat 671 figure reserved for launches and the like. A lightweight 6.1-kWh battery is located above the rear axle.

An entry-level model called the GLC 43 4Matic Coupe, also powered by a 2.0L four banger, is able to produce 416 horsepower plus an additional 14 ponies via a belt-driven starter generator at lower engine speeds. Like the 63 trim, it gets the nine-speed automatic which deploys a wet starting clutch in place of a torque converter. Merc estimates this model will scamper to 60 mph from rest in about 4.8 seconds while it more powerful brother will run the course in approximately 3.5 ticks of the clock. It is worth mentioning the weight disparity, with the 43 listed at 4,389 pounds while the 63 bends the scales at nearly 5,100 pounds despite both cars setting down identical footprints. Electrified guts tend to be tremendously heavy, after all.


The cabin is typical Mercedes, which is to say stern but comfortable with a duo of enormous screens up front. As with so many models from the brand these days, a landscape tablet sits ahead of the driver serving duty as a gauge cluster while a portrait tablet dominates the center stack as mission control for infotainment. Both can be configured umpteen different ways, with the likes of AMG Track Pace tools and an AMG-exclusive display style on hand so owners can brag to their passengers.

Expect to see these machines in 2024, though the 43 and 63 may end up being different model years.


[Image: Mercedes-Benz]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Sep 26, 2023

    Does this monster above its weight? I am very impressed.

  • El scotto El scotto on Sep 26, 2023

    -channeling my inner Kenneth Mars- It is a coupe because Merzedes say's it est une kupe! Quiet schweinhunds! Dis is zee best kupe in zee vorld! Merzedes says so! Zee best or nothing Mein Herrs!

  • Lou_BC Nah. Tis but a scratch. It's not as if they canceled a pickup model or SUV. Does anyone really care about one less Chevy car?
  • ToolGuy If by "sedan" we mean a long (enough) wheelbase, roomy first and second row, the right H point, prodigious torqueages, the correct balance of ride/handling for long-distance touring, large useable trunk, lush enveloping sound system, excellent seat comfort, thoughtful interior storage etc. etc. then yes we need 'more' sedans, not a lot more, just a few really nice ones.If by "sedan" we mean the twisted interpretation by the youts from ArtCenter who apparently want to sit on the pavement in a cramped F16 cockpit and punish any rear seat occupants, then no, we don't need that, very few people want that (outside of the 3 people who 'designed' it) which is why they didn't sell and got canceled.Refer to 2019 Avalon for a case study in how to kill a sedan by listening to the 'stylists' and prioritizing the wrong things.
  • Lou_BC Just build 4 sizes of pickups. Anyone who doesn't want one can buy a pickup based SUV ;)
  • Jor65756038 If GM doesn't sell a sedan, I'll buy elswhere. Not everybody likes SUV's or crossovers or is willing to buy one no matter what.
  • ToolGuy One thing is for sure: Automakers have never gone wrong following the half-baked product planning advice of automotive journalists. LOL.I wonder: Does the executive team at GM get their financial information from the Manager of Product and Consumer Insights at AutoPacific? Or do they have another source? Hmm...
Next