Mazda’s Electric MX-30 Being Pulled From the U.S. Market

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The Mazda MX-30 EV will be pulled from the U.S. market after 2023, with the manufacturer stating its preference to prioritize hybrid models. While the small crossover will live on in other parts of the world with a rotary range extender, mimicking what BMW did with the i3 with some Mazda-specific flair, the company’s first all-electric vehicle seems to have been a flop in North America. 


Let’s be objective. The MX-30 EV (not to be confused with the CX-30) was always a compliance automobile. The vehicle comes with a laughably short range of 100 miles and was sold exclusively in California with sales volumes that can only be described as abysmal. Mazda sold just 181 examples of the MX-30s in 2021 and another 324 in 2022. It wasn’t a popular model and that fact doesn’t appear to be changing in 2023. 

We’ve seen other brands field models with a similar trajectory before and undoubtedly will again in a bid to comply with escalating CAFE standards. 


Other markets received MX-30s equipped with a 2.0-liter e-Skyactiv motor (mild hybrid) and the company debuted a plug-in hybrid with the aforementioned range extender in January of 2023. While there’s a chance the United States might someday see those versions go on sale, we recommend holding your breath. The rotary assisted PHEV doesn’t seem to be any faster and boasts an even smaller battery good for about 50 miles. 


While the range extender is supposed to make that a non issue for the MX-30, the concept hasn’t resonated with American consumers — who seem to prefer traditional hybrids to EVs boasting gasoline-powered generators. 

All of the above reminds us of the Fiat 500e, which the late Sergio Marchionne confessed existed solely to satisfy emission regulations. He even went so far as to request consumers not purchase the vehicle due to the fact that Fiat Chrysler Automobiles lost money on every transaction. 


But the model is going back on sale in the U.S. under the Stellantis banner, with improvements to its range the company believes will make it more desirable. This may also be what’s in store for the MX-30. However, Fiat’s new leadership seems supremely interested in EV sales whereas Mazda appears to be a company that’s only doing electrification out of obligation. The Japanese brand has always seemed more interested in squeezing every drop it could out of small combustion engines than diving into battery power. 


At any rate, Mazda does seem keen to offer more hybrids and has said that will be key to its current production strategy. Leadership has even suggested the MX-30 may return to our market in hybrid guise. But nothing other than the EV variant’s demise has been made official thus far.

[Images: Mazda]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 25 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Aug 01, 2023

    They're just following Toyota's lead in inching away from plug-in anything. This country is too big, and most people travel too many miles, for the urban plug-in to be a success outside of congested cities like Boston/NYC.


    The market outside of those dense urban zones is much bigger (and potentially more profitable) and gas/electric hybrids make more sense. If they're not selling enough plug-ins to move the CAFE needle, more Gas/electric hybrids will.


    Matt Posky hit the nail on the head: the plug-in is a CAFE compliance vehicle, and it didn't sell enough to do the job. Technically, so are the gas/electric hybrids, but they're cheaper to make and easier to sell in volume at a profit. Look for more automakers selling in the US to do the same.

    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Aug 01, 2023

      You know, plug-in BEVs travel all over the country. The MX-30 is an exceptionally poor EV for today's market; don't use it as any sort of metric for BEV suitability.

  • SPPPP SPPPP on Aug 01, 2023

    I disagree with the idea that the MX-30 is a compliance vehicle. There wasn't enough production allocation to make a real difference in CAFE or emissions scores. I look at it as a real-world test platform. Its lack of sales is not really an issue for Mazda at this point. However, Mazda had better put the research to good use, because if the US government continues to follow Europe's central-planning industrial policy, gasoline engines will be stamped out within about 10 years.

    • See 2 previous
    • Sgeffe Sgeffe on Aug 02, 2023

      @Bullnuke: Da, Comrade!


  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
Next