Range Finder: Rivian Offers Smaller Battery on R1S and R1T

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Hitting the powertrain of its pickup truck and SUV with a shrink ray has permitted Rivian to offer a new battery option – and a new price point – for its pair of all-electric models.

A so-called Standard battery is in the pipe, packing 106 kWh of capacity and an estimated 270 miles of driving range on a full charge. There will also be a Standard+ configuration, with 121 kWh and 315 miles range. In comparison to other options on the order sheet, the Large battery is rated at about 350 miles of total driving distance while the mighty Max battery carries a 410-mile estimate from the EPA eggheads.


You may expect these new arrangements to be accompanied by a lower price – and you’d be right. The fresh Standard arrangement is just over nine grand less expensive than the Large, meaning customers can get into an R1T for $71,700 or an R1S for $76,700. This sum unlocks the Dual Motor powertrain, good for 533 horsepower. Right now, that’s the only way to get the Standard battery, though the Standard+ can be paired with the tastier 665 hp Dual Motor Performance model. 


For those keeping track, the Standard+ will be a $3,100 walk from the Standard; adding the Performance gubbins tacks on another five grand. Before destination fees, the R1T now slides under 70 large in Standard Dual Motor guise. And with numerous trims ducking under the $80,000 limbo bar, there could be some federal tax incentives in the offing. However, structure for EV rebates in America confuse this author to no end, so he will defer to our own Matt Posky, who is the resident expert on that topic.


These rigs are available to build and price on the Rivian website, suggesting they could be ordered and delivered before the snow melts.


[Images: Rivian]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 17 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Feb 13, 2024

    I've read that the body design and integration means exceptionally expensive repair costs for minor damage.

    • See 2 previous
    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Feb 14, 2024

      My first post here got wiped out, but there is a fellow on YouTube who was quoted $41k for a crushed lower rear corner of his R1T. Using PDR, it was fixed for much less.

      Thing is, it was nearly perfect, but not perfect. I suspect an authorized repair shop pretty much has to use new parts.

  • Calrson Fan Calrson Fan on Feb 13, 2024

    Still way too expensive for a PU or SUV with such limited capability and no resale value. Extra bonus is they are from a company that probably won't be around in 5 years due to their poor business model. I can think of so many better ways to foolishly spend $80K!

  • Flashindapan My neighbor just got a new MDX A-spec in glacier white. I don’t really notice three row crossovers or SUVs much anymore, but I have to say these do have some presence.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Our BN in Iraq lost their CDR, driver, gunner, interpersonal and RTO when his M1151 Hummer was hit by a 1000 lb VBIED (car bomb). We took the casualties back to the FOB. It brings a lot of things into perspective when you have a family knowing the families of those KIA a will never be the same from their loss. My three boys were1, 2, and 7 at the time.
  • Theflyersfan Let's look at Tesla in 2024 here: Reported last month that Tesla deliveries drop 8.5% from a year ago - the first drop since 2020 and the chip shortages. Other brands EV sales have increased.The Cybertruck has generated far more negative reviews and social media backlash than Tesla could have anticipated. Quality just isn't there.Ongoing lawsuits with the self-driving software and crashes and fatalities.The rest of the lineup is getting stale and the main tweaks over the years have been changes to the interface and exterior lights, plus some extra power in the Model S. But that has been essentially the same model since 2013, which is an eternity in the auto world.All of these things lined up and he wants a $56 billion contract. I understand that Musk has a Kardashian-level need of being in the spotlight at all times, but there are better ways to do that and not look like a tone deaf fool. And now that Tesla has been established and is capable of selling cars, Musk might not be in as strong of a position that he thinks he is. There is the very real chance that someone else might be able to come in and freshen up the lineup and fix some of these lingering issues that continue to plague their cars. Microsoft survived after Bill Gates left. Apple survived after Steve Jobs died. And I think Tesla will survive if the board tells Musk to kick rocks.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh "...he also recently threatened that he would not create new AI technology for the automaker if he didn’t have at least 25 percent control of the company" like HE is the one building it and not other people he's fleecing and abusing to build it for him .. Just get rid of the meatsack and use the 56 billion to you know .. make the product better..
  • SCE to AUX "...he also recently threatened that he would not create new AI technology for the automaker if he didn’t have at least 25 percent control of the company"One can only hope. Maybe this will be his excuse for not getting FSD across the finish line.When he bails, unfortunately the Board should be overhauled as well. Tesla has become a reflection of its bizarre leader.Thankfully, SpaceX is better managed.
Next