Report: Ford CEO Says China Strategy Changing

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Ford Motor Company is tweaking plans in China and seeking to turn around financial losses after five years of lackluster sales within the region. The new strategy will be focused on exporting to other countries, commercial product, and reinforcing the necessary supply chain for all-electric vehicles.


CEO Jim Farley has reportedly returned from Asia to finalize those plans, which were reiterated during a press call about Ford’s first-quarter earnings held earlier in the week. According to Automotive News, the executive stated that China would remain important to the company. But that the businesses would need to focus on sectors that would yield the highest return on investment. So far, direct sales haven’t been a part of that.


But it doesn’t appear to be for a lack of trying. Ford has introduced new models specifically designed to cater to Chinese customers. Still, Changan Ford (the automaker’s regional joint venture) only held 1 percent of all Chinese light-vehicle sales in 2022 vs the 4 percent it managed to snag in 2016.


The business lost $572 million in China last year. Sadly, it will be harder to determine how it’s doing moving forward because Ford doesn’t intend on breaking down earnings by geographic location anymore. Like many manufacturers, it has also streamlined its sales reporting to a point where the resulting data borders on useless.


Ah, transparency.


"We're not going to try to serve everyone," Farley said on Tuesday. "It will be a lower investment, leaner, much more focused business in China."


From Automotive News:


Farley cited the company's joint venture partnership with Jiangling Motors Group as an example of what it will do moving forward, with plans to use Chinese operations as "export hubs" for affordable EVs and commercial vehicles to markets such as South America, Australia and Mexico.
Last month, the company announced the next-generation Lincoln Nautilus for North America would be exported from China, a first for Lincoln. Executives have said the luxury brand is profitable in China.


Asia has historically proven to be a slippery fish for American automakers. Japan has long seemed impervious to U.S. products, despite having been so heavily influenced by American culture following the 1940s.


But things have been a little different in China. While the country has been incredibly strict on vehicle importation and often required foreign businesses to engage in partnerships with local firms, American brands do exist there. Some brands (e.g. Buick and Cadillac) have even done quite well for themselves. However, similar to Japan, it’s the German brands that seem to be getting the most love.


Ford has been trying to make China work for years. But robust sales within the region have not manifested, making its decision to revamp operations unsurprising.


That said, leadership continues to claim that the market (which is now the world’s largest) will remain incredibly important. There are just too many potential buyers and China is aggressively pushing toward electrification and basically owns the global market in terms of battery production.


"We believe that not only is it the biggest EV market in the world, but customers digitally are ahead of the rest of the world, and so it's a really important market for us," said Farley. "And what we really see in our presence there is battery tech, digital experiences for the customer and advanced product, both software and hardware integrated."


[Image: Nick Shoe/Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 3SpeedAutomatic on May 06, 2023

    Reminds me of the 80's when the Japanese kicked the Big Three and the 90's when the Koreans gobbled up the inexpensive market. The response was to dump Mercury, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Plymouth, Holden, & Saab due to diminished market share.


    As part of Plan B, The Big Three raced to China to grab an exploding market with American cachet. Now, the wind has changed direction (greater domestic quality, EV transition), yet the Big Three are caught with their pants down for the second time!!


    Stick with what you know: the Western Hemisphere and Europe; SUVs & pickups; develop EVs for the everyman like you did with ICE vehicles in the 1920's & 30's; and fight for market share. The C-Suite is full of MBAs who are afraid to get their fingers dirty; time to call in a street brawler who's not afraid of a fight.


  • Alan Alan on May 08, 2023

    Many Ford designs that are manufactured in China are designed in Australia. Ford just fired hundreds of engineers. That only leaves engineers to keep on designing the Rangers, Bronco, etc.

  • Jeanbaptiste 2022 Tesla model 3 performance ~35000 miles tires - ~$1000ish. Several cabin filters ~$50
  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
Next