In Memoriam: Marcello Gandini, an Automotive Design Master

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

The world lost one of its preeminent car designers today, as Marcello Gandini has passed away at the age of 85. Though perhaps best known for the flashy and outrageous Lamborghini Countach, Gandini’s pen was applied to many other Italian, German, French, British, Japanese, and Swedish concepts and production designs. Gandini’s prolific portfolio of work made a permanent mark on automotive design.


Born on August 26th, 1938 in Turin, Italy, Marcello Gandini was the son of a conductor. Interested in automotive design from a young age, he first attempted to break into the business in 1963 at the age of 25. Speaking with Giuseppe Bertone (1917-1997), his employment was ultimately denied by Giorgietto Giugiaro (b. 1938), a man of the same age who was the head of design at Bertone. 


Bertone kept Gandini in mind, and in two years when Giugiaro left the firm Gandini was immediately hired. He would work for Bertone for a total of 14 years, and created a dedicated studio, Stile Bertone. The studio worked exclusively on concept cars and prototypes, and before long auto manufacturers hired Bertone so Gandini could pen their design.

It was at Bertone that Gandini would draw up the majority of Lamborghini’s early vehicles, catapulting the new brand beyond the super car and into exotica territory with his daring, forward-looking designs. The first Gandini-designed Lamborghini was the Miura (1966-1973). It was one of the first examples of a car with a mid-engined layout and only two seats, and used a transverse V12.

In 1967 Gandini designed the four-seat Marzal concept, with its see-through glass door panels, and a silver metallic interior. The design was distilled into the production Espada, the company’s first four-seat grand touring sports car. Espada was a size up from Lamborghini’s previous 2+2 designs at the behest of Ferruccio Lamborghini. 


The following year Gandini invented the scissor door, used on the Alfa Romeo 33 Carabo concept. The design was put into production a few years later in the Lamborghini Countach, and continued on its successor the Diablo. Numerous other cars have used the Gandini scissor door design over the years. Alfa Romeo selected Gandini’s design for one production vehicle, the Montreal of 1970.

His work on the 2+2 Lamborghini Urraco show car in 1970 inspired Ferrari, who ventured away from their Pininfarina ways and employed Bertone to design the Dino 308 GT4. The Dino was a 2+2, the first V8 Ferrari, and the only Bertone design Ferrari ever used. On the Lamborghini front, Gandini also designed the Bravo concept, Jarama, P140 concept, P147 Acosta concept, and the Diablo prototype. The Diablo design was ultimately finalized by Tom Gale at Chrysler, who also designed the LX platform Chrysler 300.

Gandini designed multiple vehicles for Fiat in the 1970s, including the midsize Dino coupe, one of the company’s final large family cars the 132, and the X1/9 that was marketed in the United States as the Bertone X1/9 by Malcom Bricklin. Though low in production figures, Gandini designed what became one of the most famous rally cars in the world, the Lancia Stratos. The Stratos won the World Rally Championship in 1974, 1975, and 1976. Stratos was the result of Lancia taking a chance on Bertone, as (like Ferrari) the company had previously used Pininfarina to design its vehicles.

In between high-end exotic designs, Gandini also designed mass-production vehicles. He penned the very first BMW 5-Series of 1972. The Innocenti Mini, an Italian take on the Austin Mini debuted in 1974. A year later the first generation Volkswagen Polo launched with a Gandini design. Polo was accompanied by the more upmarket Audi 50, which was also designed at Bertone. Gandini shaped the five-door Citroen BX production car, and created a very similar concept called the Tundra for Volvo.

Gandini designed three different cars for Italian sports car maker Iso, of which the Lele was produced from 1969 to 1974. Around that time he was also responsible for the design of the Maserati Khamsin. Maserati worked with Gandini independently after Bertone, on cars like the Ghibli (1992-1998). He also designed the front-drive Citroen SM based Maserati Quattroporte of 1976, the rear-drive BiTurbo based Quattroporte of 1994, and the 1990 Shamal coupe.

Along the way, Gandini developed a signature characteristic: A forward and upward shaped rear wheel arch. It persisted through decades of his work, and made spotting a Gandini design easy. More exotic car work in the Seventies was completed for De Tomaso, where he designed the Pantera, and in the 2000s the Bigua which was sold as the Qvale Mangusta in the United States. Nearly on par with the Countach for outlandish design was the Cizeta-Moroder V16T. The 6.0-liter 16-cylinder hyper car saw only 13 examples produced, and looked fairly similar to the Diablo.

Gandini went on to design the crazy rear-engined Renault 5 Turbo of 1980, and the important second generation Renault 5 in 1984. Renault also hired him later to design the Magnum, a European market heavy-duty truck that was produced from 1990 to 2013. Gandini left Bertone officially in 1980 to work independently on automotive, interior, and industrial design projects. Work in the Eighties and Nineties continued with production vehicles from De Tomaso and Maserati, along with concepts like the Nissan AP-X, and the prototype of the Bugatti EB110. He also dabbled in residential architecture, interiors, and helicopter styling. 

Gandini’s design legacy on the automobile is permanent. Impactful vehicles like the Miura, Countach and Stratos are the stuff of posters, or perhaps screen wallpapers in more modern times. Today we bid farewell to a legend.


[Images: Lamborghini, seller, BMW, seller, Maserati, BaT, Renault, BaT]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to The Truth About Cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • 1995 SC 1995 SC on Mar 14, 2024

    MMMmmmmmmm......Stratos. One of my poster cars as a kid

  • Zipper69 Zipper69 on Mar 14, 2024

    Classic designs, where form followed function.

    Now that AI, algorythms and cost/benefit calculations rule styling, I fear such incredible designs will never have a modern counterpart.

  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
  • Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Ollicat I am only speaking from my own perspective so no need to bash me if you disagree. I already know half or more of you will disagree with me. But I think the traditional upscale Cadillac buyer has traditionally been more conservative in their political position. My suggestion is to make Cadillac separate from GM and make them into a COMPANY, not just cars. And made the company different from all other car companies by promoting conservative causes and messaging. They need to build up a whole aura about the company and appeal to a large group of people that are really kind of sick of the left and sending their money that direction. But yes, I also agree about many of your suggestions above about the cars too. No EVs. But at this point, what has Cadillac got to lose by separating from GM completely and appealing to people with money who want to show everyone that they aren't buying the leftist Kook-Aid.
  • Jkross22 Cadillac's brand is damaged for the mass market. Why would someone pay top dollar for what they know is a tarted up Chevy? That's how non-car people see this.
Next