Report: California Gasoline No Longer the Most Expensive

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Washington has officially managed to surpass California as the state with the highest fuel prices and looks as though it’s on track to compete for that dubious honor indefinitely. 

Based upon data tabulated by the American Automobile Association (AAA), unleaded gasoline purchases in Washington jumped by 32 cents over the past month to $4.93 a gallon. The national average is presently $3.58 per gallon.


Despite California historically being America’s most expensive state in which to buy a gallon of fuel, other regions occasionally manage to swipe the title away. But this is usually due to unforeseen supply problems and typically pertains to Hawaii — which sources more of its fuel from the Eastern Hemisphere than the rest of the United States and has less room to store it.


Washington’s fuel pricing isn’t a matter of it being isolated in the middle of the ocean. Earlier this year, the state introduced a new carbon-pricing program (part of the Climate Commitment Act, and Clean Fuel Standard) that fines businesses for any greenhouse gas they emit. The scheme is supposed to spur competitive environmentalism while raking in a bunch of money for the government. But it’s starting to look like companies are just raising their prices to offset the new green fees.


According to The Seattle Times, the first two quarterly auctions of Washington’s emission allowances hauled in more than $850 million. But energy companies weren’t interested in their profits taking a hit and have responded in a predictable manner.


From The Seattle Times:


Now oil companies are choosing to pass on the compliance fees, the experts say. Those costs add up to about 50 cents per gallon for the consumer, according to the Oil Price Information Service, a Dow Jones company that collects fuel-pricing information for many clients, including AAA. The state Department of Ecology, which oversees the carbon-pricing program, says it’s aware of oil companies passing on the costs but has no power to stop it.
Gas prices are still lower than the inflation-plagued summer months last year, but the spike has bolstered the arguments of conservative think tanks and trade organizations representing fuel companies that are running public-messaging campaigns calling the compliance fees a tax. Some are calling for the repeal of the climate legislation altogether.
Gov. Jay Inslee’s office said it is too soon to accurately assess the price impact of the state’s climate policies. “No one would be surprised, however, if oil companies experiencing record profits are choosing to pass their compliance costs to customers — sometimes even for fuels that are exempt under the law,” said Jaime Smith, Inslee’s executive director of communications, in a written statement.


Whether or not Big Oil’s response was obvious, it doesn’t change the fact that another so-called climate initiative has resulted in consumers spending more of their money. We can bicker about whether or not the state’s carbon-pricing scheme can be formally considered a tax, what its original intent was, and how the equally unhelpful political parties are handling things. The Seattle Times goes on to say climate change is decimating Washington’s salmon population, degrading the air quality, and worsening seasonal wildfires. Others would argue those are the result of regional mismanagement. But the bottom line is that energy companies are simply shrugging at the state’s regulatory efforts and demanding more money per gallon of product.


Washington and Oregon are neighboring states and have enjoyed similar fuel prices throughout most of history. But the former began seeing its energy prices break away roughly a decade ago with a dramatic jump witnessed at the start of 2023. The Oil Price Information Service estimates Washington’s new carbon regulations now tally a fee of about 50 cents per gallon of gasoline — up from 37 cents per gallon in the first quarter of this year.


Oil companies aren't even trying to keep this a secret. Allowances are tradable, allowing wealthy businesses to effectively buy the right to pollute more than their rivals. But the industry has also announced it would be instituting a fee on fuel sales for costs incurred by trying to comply with Wahsington’s new regulatory scheme.


This likely means that Washington boasting higher fuel prices than California won’t be an isolated event. The two states will probably be in competition for years to come as they continue to introduce environmental policies that will lead to oil producers raising their prices in an effort to remain ludicrously profitable.


While the Golden State still averages higher prices in its urban hubs, Seattle has settled in at $5.09 for a gallon of regular gasoline. CNN also reported that Washington’s Skamania County presently averages $5.32 a gallon, which is trending higher than just about everywhere else in the country.


“We’re like six months in,” said Claire Boyte-White, a spokesperson for Washington’s Department of Ecology, “and yes, oil companies started increasing their prices in January, long before they had even a chance to pay for anything [in the new carbon-pricing program].”


Of course, leadership suggested the scheme would have little-to-no impact on fuel pricing before it was implemented.


“This is going to have a minimal impact, if any. Pennies. We are talking about pennies,” Governor Inslee said in 2022. “Potentially, not all of this would be passed off to the consumer, and what they would [pass on] would be pennies.”


The matter is now being framed as wholly political. Conservatives are being accused of helping the oil industry by favoring deregulation and Democrats are being accused of championing government intervention that will ultimately encourage the energy sector to raise its prices.


[Image: Michael Vi/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 49 comments
  • BEPLA BEPLA on Jun 26, 2023

    @Lorenzo - Hardly a conspiracy.

    Try some other C words: Centralization and Capitalism.

  • Vatchy Vatchy on Jun 29, 2023

    I'm still wondering where all of the electricity to power the electric cars is coming from . I haven't noticed anybody building any new power plants.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next