China's Huawei Establishes ‘Smart Car’ Unit With Changan Auto

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Huawei has announced it will continue becoming intertwined with the automotive sector after signing onto a joint venture with Chinese state-owned carmaker Changan Automobile. The telecommunications giant has established Shenzhen Yinwang Intelligent Technology with a registered capital of 1 billion yuan ($140 million USD) and a focus on smart car equipment manufacturing, artificial intelligence system integration services, and AI software development.


According to the South China Morning Post, the new unit is wholly owned by Huawei and will be used to help transfer technology between the phone company and Changan Auto. The telecom firm previously said that the plan would be to “integrate the core technologies and resources of [Huawei’s] smart car solutions into the new company.”


The firm declined to comment on the relationship between the new entity and the agreement it signed with Changan in November.


From the South China Morning Post:


In November, Richard Yu Chengdong, CEO of Huawei’s consumer business group and chairman of its Intelligent Automotive Solution business unit, called on Chinese carmakers Seres Group, Chery Automobile, JAC Motors and BAIC Motor to take an equity stake in the Huawei-Changan JV.
All four of these companies — generally considered smaller carmakers in the country — currently partner with Huawei to develop and sell new brands under the so-called Huawei Select model, through which the smartphone giant collaborates closely with companies on everything from product design to sales. These brands include Aito with Seres and Luxeed with Chery.


While this arrangement yields roughly the same level of importance as if Microsoft or Apple had a joint partnership to develop automotive tech, it has to be said that the outlet is known for over-hyping regional businesses and effectively serves as propaganda for the Chinese government. However, one could make similar arguments about select Western outlets and bias certainly doesn’t mean the reporting defaults as false. Still, particular attention should always be given to framing of any article. 


Huawei has been getting involved with loads of industries in a bid to see its technology become the foundation of smart devices that leverage connectivity to monopolize user data, create new revenue streams, and provide additional opportunities for government surveillance. We’ve seen something similar taking place in Western markets as “smart devices” became commonplace and automotive connectivity was standardized. But Huawei has been sanctioned by the United States, meaning whatever tech it develops for cars likely won’t be making it to our shores.


Changan has also said that the telecom giant had promised not to manufacture cars on its own while the joint venture was in effect. Most of the work will be focused on developing new cockpits using novel interfaces (likely touch screens and augmented reality displays) that take into account artificial intelligence and voice command. The duo are reportedly still in discussions as to exactly what that entails. But they’re already making room for other automakers to jump aboard the program — which is currently using the working title “Newcool.”


With the Chinese government encouraging all automakers to get under the umbrella, they’re effectively obligated to jump aboard the program. A large portion of domestic brands already have working partnerships with Huawei and there seems to be a state-backed push for that trend to continue.


[Image: Huawei]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
 4 comments
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Kwik_Shift_Pro4X on Jan 18, 2024

    Coming to your 15 Minute City soon.

    • See 2 previous
    • 1995_SC 1995_SC on Jan 19, 2024

      Try the Gulag. I'm sure you guys will get scolded by our resident CCP apologists on this site



  • Slavuta Kia Soul mostly driven by retirees
  • Wjtinfwb I liked these when new, but a friend that had a GT with the V8 said it was very underwhelming in day to day use and the Pontiac dealer had zero idea how to fix anything that wasn't engine related. He dumped his after 3 years at a huge loss. This one looks beat beyond its miles and age, if transportation is what you need and $3500 is your budget, look for a similar age Accord, Camry, Corolla, etc. Not sexy but won't break you hear and wallet simultaneously.
  • ToolGuy I am boycotting the TTAC Podcast after that last one (shudder), so I will go ahead and chime in here without listening first.If I had a teen and the teen needed a vehicle, here's where I would be:a) Large enough that the kid doesn't start off life thinking that small cars sold in the U.S. are any good or suitable for U.S. roads and other U.S. drivers (for they are not).b) Large enough to have some mass and crumple space when involved in an accident.c) New enough to have airbags and good passive safety features.d) Old enough so that parking lot dings and scratches and minor fender-benders will not be a major issue. (Also save on the insurance, to the extent possible.)e) Enough pre-existing miles that it will require some wrenching and maintenance, which will involve the kid.f) Old enough to not have all the distracting whizbang screens and connectivity (let's focus on your driving, kid).g) New enough to have OBD-II. Old enough to not require registering a new battery and similar frippery.h) ICE powertrain, naturally, so that the kid can truly appreciate the next vehicle, which shall be an EV.i) Underpowered enough to not cause undue heartache.j) Big enough that the fuel bills will sting, every time. (You gonna be a prisoner of the system, kid? Learn sooner than I did.)k) Good outward visibility, no who am I kidding, you can't get that anymore.l) Upscale soft-touch interior materials but only if the kid is a future automotive journalist DON'T DO IT KID. 😉
  • Wjtinfwb 38k for 150 miles of range and poor performance. Add that to the miniscule accommodations and two words come to mind. Good Luck.
  • SPPPP We getting another Abarth? Or some other kind of hot hatch variant?
Next