Baltimore Bridge Collapse Has Major Implications for Automotive Sector

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

A cargo container ship exiting the Port of Baltimore collided with the Francis Scott Key Bridge early Tuesday morning. You’ve undoubtedly seen the footage by now, as well as the rampant speculation about what happened. As of now, nobody seems to know the full details of the incident but the ramifications should be relatively easy to predict. As a major shipping corridor for the United States, losing access means supply chain bottlenecks.


It simultaneously makes for a good excuse whenever the transport of goods is delayed or companies begin pitching higher rates for oceanic freight — something we saw take place in the wake of the pandemic.


The Port of Baltimore is responsible for moving all kinds of goods. But it’s most famous for passenger vehicles, semi trucks, and construction equipment. In fact, it’s typically the U.S. port that sees the largest number of cars and light trucks annually — at roughly 800,000 passenger vehicles per year.


However, losing the Francis Scott Key Bridge will effectively make the port useless until the area can be cleared of debris. Before collapsing, the bridge stood at the mouth of the port and required ships to pass beneath it to reach the docks. Until the necessary clean up has been concluded, no container ships will be able to use the port.


From Reuters:


Baltimore port's private and public terminals handled 847,158 autos and light trucks in 2023, the most of any U.S. port. The port also handles farm and construction machinery, sugar, gypsum and coal, according to a Maryland government website.
The port handles imports and exports for major automakers including Nissan, Toyota, General Motors, Volvo, Jaguar Land Rover and the Volkswagen Group — including luxury models for Audi, Lamborghini and Bentley.
Volkswagen on Tuesday said its port operations in Baltimore were unaffected by a local bridge collapse due to the location of its facilities.
"We do not anticipate any impact on vessel operations but there may be trucking delays as traffic will be rerouted in the area," the carmaker said in an e-mailed statement.


Meanwhile, logistics providers have been inundated with worried customers. The next few weeks will see numerous diversions to shipping routes and it’s likely to be several months before the port is even usable.


“Our first priority is engaging clients to make plans for containers that were originally routed to Baltimore that will be discharged at other ports on the Eastern Seaboard,” stated Paul Brashier, vice president of drayage and intermodal for ITS Logistics.


“These diverted volumes will impact the ports of New York/New Jersey, Norfolk and the Southeast and we have to prepare trucking and transload capacity to get that freight to its intended network.”


The container ship Dali that collided with the bridge was on its way out of the Port of Baltimore, en route to Colombo, Sri Lanka when it collided with one of the large pillars. The ship’s manifest stipulated that it was staffed by a 22-man crew from India. While there has been some speculation about a possible terror plot, strict terrorism seems unlikely due to the fact that the incident took place during the hours that the bridge would have been the least populated. Industrial or economic terrorism on behalf of another nation seems more likely. But there’s been no evidence to support either claim. At present, it appears to have been a terrible accident.


An investigation is underway but the only things they’ve been able to glean is what the public has already heard. Maryland Governor Wes Moore has said that the ship lost power shortly before the incident. There were also rumors of fire, however those appear to be unfounded.


Six individuals have been reported missing, though we don’t yet know who they are. Two individuals were pulled from the water. However, investigators using sonar have found that there are several vehicles located beneath the water. The Maryland Secretary of Transportation said some of those are assumed to have belonged to work crews that were present at the time of the crash.


The Singapore-flagged Dali had previously collided with a dock at Port of Antwerp in 2016. That incident was attributed to mistakes made by the master and pilot on board. Synergy Marine Group, which owns and manages the ship, confirmed the vessel hit a pillar of the bridge at about 1:30 on Tuesday morning, with every member of the crew accounted for.


President Joe Biden has reportedly said he plans to travel to Baltimore “as quickly as I can.” Statements were also made that he plans for the federal government to pick up the entire cost of rebuilding the Francis Scott Key Bridge.


“We’re going to rebuild that port together,” Biden from the White House, before departing for North Carolina to discuss the administration’s healthcare agenda as part of his reelection campaign.


If you live in the Midwest or Northeastern United States, there’s a good chance you’ll be impacted by the bridge going down. As previously mentioned, automobiles will be the primary cargo that’s to be affected. But coal, gasoline, construction materials, and a myriad of other items will likewise be impacted by the incident. Ships are already being rerouted to alternative ports. But it’ll be weeks before a comprehensive workaround is sorted out and any solution is likely to require the use of additional rail cars and trucking freight.


[Image: Alexander Briggs/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 163 comments
  • Zipper69 Zipper69 on Mar 31, 2024

    I thought only the bobbleheads on Fox would be asinine enough to actually claim that DEI had ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS.

    Seems I was wrong, as a jughead repeats the claim and tops himself by connecting the all Indian crew with racial diversity.

    Newsflash: all Indian crews ARE CHEAPER.

    Please wear your white hood when posting further racist trash.

  • Bpscarguy Bpscarguy on Apr 04, 2024

    As someone born, raised and currently living in Baltimore.... here is a news flash for the dummy in chief - Baltimore is just up the road from DC! You can be there in about 40 minutes driving, probably 10 minutes in Marine 1. So, pretty lame that he says he is going to make it there "As quickly as he can". Whatever. More useless every day...

  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next