2023 Jeep Wrangler 4xe Rubicon Review – Charged-Up Jeep

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2023 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 4xe Fast Facts

Powertrain
2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder (270 horsepower @ 5,250 RPM; 295 lb-ft of torque @ 3,000 RPM), paired with starter/generator electric motor and transmission traction electric motor. Total system horsepower 375 @ 5,250 RPM; total system torque 47
Transmission/Drive Wheel Layout
Eight-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPGe/MPG
49 combined MPGe city/highway, 20 mpg combined city/highway (EPA Rating)
Range U.S./Canada
Up to 21 miles EV-only, 370 miles total (EPA Rating); 35 km EV-only/557 km total (NRCan Rating)
Fuel Economy, Le/100km and L/100km
4.8; 11.6 / 11.9 / 11.7 (NRCan Rating)
Base Price
$58,595 (U.S.) / $64,978 (Canada)
Price As-Tested
$69,385 (U.S.) / $73,978 (Canada)
Prices include $1,595 destination charge in the United States and N/A for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

The first thing you should know about the 2023 Jeep Wrangler 4xe Rubicon is that aside from the powertrain, the experience is pretty much the same as it would be with any other Wrangler.

In other words, if for some reason the idea of a PHEV Wrangler bothers you, relax.


Yes, you get a plug-in hybrid setup. You still get Rubicon off-road capability, on-road dynamics that remind you of the trade-offs you make for that off-roading ability, and the now-familiar Wrangler cabin. Now you can run it solely on electric power for up to 21 miles and plug it in to charge.

I didn’t get a chance to take the 4xe off-road during my loan, but the Rubicon comes with all the off-road goodies such as Dana 44 heavy-duty axles at the front and rear and a full-time transfer case with a 4:1 low-range gear ratio. It also includes electronic front and rear locking differentials, a front sway bar that disconnects, and 33-inch BF Goodrich all-terrain tires.

While I didn’t take this loaner onto the trail, I feel confident it would do just fine in the back woods.

On-road, the biggest difference from other Rubicon Wranglers I’ve driven is that going EV-only for a bit results in relatively silent running. That’s about it.

Oh, wait, I forgot – like with most electrified vehicles, you get instant torque when accelerating, at least in EV mode. That’s a nice little bonus.

I don’t mean to sound sarcastic – it really IS nice that this Jeep is so silent sometimes and that you can summon up all 470 lb-ft of system torque from a dead stop. It gives you the chance for some seriously swift acceleration without making the fuel-economy sacrifices demanded of you by the bonkers 392.

Unlike the 392, this Jeep uses a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder that works in concert with two electric motors and a 400-volt battery pack, plus an eight-speed automatic transmission. Total system horsepower: 375.

The problem with electrifying the Wrangler is that while there are some new party tricks at play that enhance the experience, the rest of the proceedings are familiar in both ways good and bad. You still have the on-road ride that reminds you the Rubicon is meant to tackle, well, the Rubicon. Bouncy and stiff is the order of the day.

Wrangler steering is much improved over generations past, but it’s still numb and artificial, though the heft is right. Exterior noise is still intrusive.

And all of these flaws are still willingly embraced because of what this rig is capable of doing off-road, and because Wranglers still look damn cool. Oh, and because you can go doorless and topless, should you choose.

It’s going to be the theme of just about every Wrangler (and Ford Bronco, for that matter) review that I write – these off-road rigs are quite annoying on road but that’s OK because that’s the point. They’re supposed to be. So while other SUVs might get dinged for these things, we chalk it up to part of the experience. Sure, you might buy a Wrangler only for the image and not for the utility – but you can’t say we didn’t warn you.

Speaking of warning, we can’t say we didn’t warn you that this Jeep doesn’t come cheap. The base price for my test unit was $58,595. In addition to the Rubicon items, that price included trailer-sway damping, Uconnect infotainment with navigation, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, Wi-Fi hot spot, satellite radio, 4 USB ports, LED lighting, and air conditioning.

Options included leather seats ($1,995), a Cold Weather Group ($1,195) that included heated front seats, heated steering wheel, and remote start; a $995 trailer towing package; all-weather floor mats ($170); power top ($4,145); and off-road camera ($695). With the $1,595 destination, that added up to $69,385.

Your combined MPGe is 49, and your gas-only combined MPG is 20.

The question I kept asking myself during my loan is this: Does going PHEV make the Wrangler Rubicon better?

For those with a consistent place to plug in, the answer is yes – you’ll be able to save at the pump if you can maximize the EV-only mileage. The instant torque is helpful on road, and probably helpful off-road as well. The silent running is nice.

Then again, one can argue that a 392 Wrangler is also better than a standard one – it too offers prodigious power, and a V8 soundtrack is great. Of course, that version won’t pass many fuel pumps.

So it all comes down to use case. If you can plug in often and afford the higher MSRP, the 4xe will make a lot of sense for you and it doesn’t take away any of the Wrangler Rubicon’s core strengths.

You don’t need the 4xe. But if you have the scratch and the access to juice, it makes a strong argument for itself.

[Images © ]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
12 of 46 comments
  • Tassos Tassos on Aug 06, 2023

    The ORIGINAL Military Jeep in 1941 cost only $650.


    Shows you how the irresponsible Congress and Presidents since then have RUINED the US Dollar (but none more than senile idiot Joe Biden and the Dems in Congress)


    THIS Week the US has also lost its once perfect credit rating. If you have not been paying attention, your 401ks and other investments (if you got any) have lost 10,000s of $ in just one or two days this week. (mine lost $110k!, and the senile idiot still has more than a year left!).

    But don't worry about me. Unless I change radically, from living WAY below my means, to trying to use them up, I can't take it with me anyway. It's more of an insurance, which can later (much later!) go to some good causes (and a few deserving people)


    And it is only 'paper losses', of course, But the implications of the downgrade of the US in the financial markets will be terrible for the average, hand-to-mouth, indebted Joe Sixpack. ANd especially his kids and grandkids...


    • See 9 previous
    • Art_Vandelay Art_Vandelay on Aug 07, 2023

      You should do a better job managing your investments


  • Zerofoo Zerofoo on Aug 07, 2023

    Who spends $70k on a hybrid vehicle to save money on fuel?


    This is insanity.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next