2023 Jeep Grand Wagoneer L Series III Obsidian Review – Smooth Sailing

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2023 Jeep Grand Wagoneer L Series III Obsidian Fast Facts

Powertrain
3.0-liter twin-turbocharged inline-six cylinder (510 horsepower @ 5,700 RPM, 500 lb-ft @ 3,500 RPM)
Transmission/Drive-Wheel Layout
Eight-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPG
14 city / 19 highway / 16 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, L/100km
17.0 city / 12.5 highway / 15.0 combined (EPA Rating)
Base Price
$113,095 (U.S.) / $138,946 (Canada)
As-Tested Price
$120,655 (U.S.) / $142,936 (Canada)
Prices include $2,000 destination charge in the United States and $2,195 to $2,895 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

The word “Hurricane” doesn’t usually conjure up a feeling of smoothness. Hurricanes are brutal forces of nature that involve whipping winds, flying debris, and extremely choppy waters.


Jeep’s Grand Wagoneer got the Hurricane treatment for the 2023 model year – those engines have now found their way into the 2025 Ram 1500, as well. As with the Ram, buyers can pick between two 3.0-liter, twin-turbocharged, inline-six-cylinder engines. One makes 420 horsepower and 468 lb-ft of torque while the other pumps out 510 ponies and 500 lb-ft of twist. My test vehicle had the latter.

(Full disclosure: I was on vacation in Palm Springs, California and Stellantis was nice enough to loan me the Grand Wagoneer for testing while I was in SoCal.)

I hadn’t wheeled a Wagoneer with a Hurricane motor since our first drive in Montana, so I was curious to see if the impressions I gathered way back in twenty-aught-two would hold up over several days of driving that would include a trip to Joshua Tree National Park and two long jaunts from LAX to Palm Springs and back, plus a sprinkling of suburban and urban motoring.

For the most part, they did. I remembered how smooth the experience was, both in terms of engine operation and ride, and that didn’t change, especially on mostly unbroken California pavement.

Like with the Ram, the higher-output Hurricane offered up plenty of thrust. That’s counterbalanced a bit by the massive curb weight of nearly 7,000 pounds(!) but there was still enough guts for around-town acceleration and relatively easy freeway passing.

Handling is acceptable for a beast this size, with body roll minimized – the GW handled the mountain run up to Pioneertown without too much drama. It’s far from sporty, which should be obvious, but it’s not ponderous in the way you might expect from something that rivals my condo for interior square footage.

As noted, the ride was generally smooth, and the one or two times I encountered a rough patch of pavement the Grand Wagoneer made the broken road sound and feel distant. The only time the ride was truly rough was on a washboard dirt road in Joshua Tree – though switching the drive mode to Sand/Mud seemed to mitigate it just a bit.

The only time the proceedings didn’t operate as smoothly as James Bond in a casino was on my return to Los Angeles – there was a bit of creakiness to the powertrain/transmission in the lower gears while prowling city streets at low speeds that raised my eyebrows. This dissipated as the journey wore on and I got rolling at highway speeds.

Speaking of the transmission, it’s an eight-speed automatic.

The air suspension raises and lowers the Jeep based on drive mode and speed, attempting to help with aerodynamics as well as making sure you have the proper ride height if you do any light off-roading. Aside from a brief trip down a run-of-the-mill dirt path, I didn’t do any “off roading” with this Jeep. As for how much the aerodynamics help with fuel economy, read on.

Inside, the Grand Wagoneer coddles with upscale materials, Uconnect 5 infotainment, massaging seats, a retractable lower screen in the center stack, a separate screen for passengers, a head-up display, and more. It’s roomy, as it should be given this vehicle’s size. Even the third row is comfortable for adults – I put myself back there for a few minutes and I had head and legroom aplenty despite being on the taller side. Entry and exit wasn’t super tricky, either.

I liked the little storage space on top of the center console – it’s a nice little place to set your phone or other small items.

The biggest flaw here is that the GW is, well, big. Especially with the additional seven inches of wheelbase and 12 inches of length. The Jeep extended out from parking spots in some places. Drive-thru runs in tightly-packed urban areas near LAX were more stressful than usual. When we decided to go a different direction in Joshua Tree and thus had to turn around on a dirt road, I ended up recreating a famous scene from Austin Powers.

Maybe “flaw” is the wrong word – the size is baked into the design. So, it’s a choice. I imagine it works for certain customers – I doubt Stellantis would offer a long-wheelbase option if there wasn’t enough demand for it – but if you’re thinking that you need the extra interior space, just be aware that maneuverability in tight spaces will suffer.

The other beef I have with the Grand Wagoneer/Wagoneer series remains the same one I’ve had since these beasts were launched – there are some odd styling choices here and there. The most notable one to me is the oversized D-pillar.

That said, styling is subjective and any weirdness can be cleaned up with a mid-cycle refresh. And while some choices have me scratching my head, the overall package isn’t ugly. It is, however, more cohesive in the forward half than the aft end.

What does a base price of $113,095 get you? Features not already mentioned include a two-speed on-demand transfer case, electronic rear limited-slip differential, disconnecting front-axle differential, traffic-sign recognition, rearview mirror camera, 360-degree camera, automated parking system, night vision, active lane-management, active driving assist, drowsy driver detection, full-speed forward-collision plus, blind-spot and rear cross-path detection, pedestrian emergency braking, intersection collision-assist system, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, in-car Wi-Fi, navigation, satellite radio, McIntosh audio (excellent, by the way), a rear-seat monitoring camera, a front-console cooler, rear-floor center console, heated and cooled front seats, heated steering wheel, heated and cooled rear seats, four-zone climate control, second-row captain’s chairs, power-fold reclining third-row seats, 22-inch wheels, panoramic sunroof, LED headlights, power running boards, and power liftgate. I am gonna pass out now.

The Obsidian package added black interior and exterior accents, black wheels, a black roof, and more, for $1,595. A trailer-towing package ($1,370) included trailer-brake control, trailer-hitch zoom, tow hooks, and heavy-duty engine cooling. The final option package cost $2,595 and added Amazon Fire TV for the rear seats and a 10.1-inch rear entertainment screen. D and D costs an even two grand.

Total as-tested price? $120,655. That’s … a lot.

Size is the enemy of fuel economy, and even with a reduced cylinder count the numbers are a not great 14 mpg city/19 mpg highway/16 mpg combined. In our sojourn across SoCal I got either 17.8 mpg or 18.5 mpg – there was a discrepancy between the computer and my own calculations – across approximately 430 miles of driving.

I should note that a huge chunk of the drive was on the freeway, though not without stop and go traffic. There was also the relaxed two-lane cruise through the park.

The EPA’s estimated range is about 488 miles – I think the computer was showing about 100 miles remaining when I filled up, though. So, either the computer was a bit off or the amount of highway driving was bumping up the calculation. This vehicle did require 91+ octane.

The 2023 Jeep Grand Wagoneer L is a whole lot of vehicle. Literally. That said, if you regularly haul a pack of humans and/or take a lot of road trips and want to do so smoothly, it’s as good a choice as any. Just prepare to spend a lot on both the sticker price and fuel.

Smoothness doesn’t often come cheap, after all.

[Images © 2024 Tim Healey/TTAC.com, Stellantis/Jeep]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 89 comments
  • Calrson Fan Calrson Fan on Feb 29, 2024

    Just give me a loaded Chevy Suburban w/6.2L V8. Maybe not a nice as this on the inside but a better FS SUV everywhere else. The fact that I can drive one off the lot for $30K less is icing on the cake.

    • See 2 previous
    • EBFlex EBFlex on Mar 01, 2024

      Jeff is wrong once again.


  • Paul Paul on Mar 01, 2024

    A little off topic but I am still amazed at the power of these engines. 510 net hp (over 600 gross). I think back to all the guys I grew up with, messing around with aftermarket heads, cams, pistons, stroker cranks, and God knows what else trying to get numbers like this.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next