The Right Spec: 2024 Ford Mustang

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

We walk into this Right Spec knowing it’ll likely cause a decent amount of discussion and perhaps some effigies to be set alight. The venerable Mustang is new for 2024, becoming the last man standing from Detroit after the Challenger and Camaro shuffle off this mortal coil.


Skipping right over the $30,920 EcoBoost fastback, we land at the feet of a $42,495 GT trim powered by a hairy chested V8 engine the way nature and Henry Ford intended. Blithering masculinity aside, your author realizes the four-banger belts out roughly 315 horsepower for this year, a healthy number and leagues ahead of the Fox-bodied cars so desired as a teenager. The near-500hp V8 is selected, in my addled brain, for its soundtrack and – let’s be honest – image it projects.


Here's where the effigies come into play. Ford’s generally excellent ten-speed automatic commands $1,595 and removes the mythical third pedal from the driver’s footwell; this makes it, in ancient times, an easy choice to dismiss. However, the auto ‘box can crack off shifts with alacrity (better and faster than 90 percent of people reading this – like it or not – including me), is a better play toy for lairy launch control, and wins the fuel economy argument. We’ll let you slug this one out in the comments.


The $4,995 GT Performance package should be considered required reading. It comes with a Torsen rear diff, extra bracing, Brembo-branded brakes, better wheels, unique suspension tuning, and its own rear wing. We don’t need to tell you what the ‘electric hand operated parking brake’ is for. Note well: those Brembos are available on their own in conjunction with a cheaper package for about half the cheddar of the Performance package. A $1,225 active valve exhaust makes my list because I’m extroverted and like to annoy the neighbors.

If your eyes can weather it, and I’m not sure mine can, the standard GT comes with the asinine interior design choice of plunking two tablets on the dashboard – one for gauges and one for infotainment. It looks like a cheap dual-monitor setup at Dunder Mifflin and irritates me greatly. The $47,015 GT Premium fixes this issue by blending the two screens together to make one massive horizonal tombstone. I’d happily pay the extra five grand just for this. Keep in mind the Performance package and Active Valve exhaust are still extra on the GT Premium.


So equipped, a GT is around 50 large while a GT Premium is roughly $55k. If you’re wondering, a Dark Horse – which comes equipped with most of those goodies plus a few extra horses – checks in at $60,865.

[Images: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 32 comments
  • Tim Healey Tim Healey on Jul 06, 2023

    After editing this piece the other day,I built and priced a GT Premium on the Ford site. I got it to $60K with the Performance Pack, active damping, the active exhaust, and a few other goodies.

  • Nrd515 Nrd515 on Jul 07, 2023

    I would avoid the Egoboost like the plague. Besides the problems everyone I know that has one has had with them, they don't sound right on a Mustang (Or anything else). Mine would be an auto, premium GT, and the sticket was about 56K. If you're going to buy a new Mustang, at least config it correctly, and that means a V8.

  • Make_light I like Subarus, and I often think they don't get enough credit for how they drive. Lots of people say it's the faux-rugged image that accounts for their popularity, but they also drive with a solidity and plantedness that's absent from a lot of the Japanese competition. That being said, this thing is ugly. I never felt that Subarus were as ugly as commenters claim they are. Boring, sure, but not necessarily ugly. But between this and the refreshed Legacy, it's like they're trying to make their vehicles look as incohesive and awkward as possible.
  • SCE to AUX I think the 2.2 was a pretty durable engine.
  • Rochester We'll probably be trading in our 2018 Touring Edition Forester for the next model, and are waiting to see what the Hybrid is all about. Would be nice if they disclose whether or not it will be a plug-in Hybrid.
  • CEastwood I have a friend who drives an early aughts Forrester who refuses to get rid of it no matter all it's problems . I believe it's the head gasket eater edition . He takes great pains regularly putting in some additive that is supposed prevent head gasket problems only to be told by his mechanic on the latest timing belt change that the heads are staring to seep . Mechanics must love making money off those cars and their flawed engine design . Below is another satisfied customer of what has to be one of the least reliable Japanese cars .https://www.theautopian.com/i-regret-buying-a-new-subaru/
  • Wjtinfwb 157k is not insignificant, even for a Honda. A lot would depend on the maintenance records and the environment the car was operated in. Up to date maintenance and updated wear items like brakes, shocks, belts, etc. done recently? Where did those 157k miles accumulate? West Texas on open, smooth roads that are relatively easy on the chassis or Michigan, with bomb crater potholes, snow and salt that take their toll on the underpinnings. That Honda 4 will run forever with decent maintenance but the underneath bits deteriorate on a Honda just like they do on a Chevy.
Next