FTC Launches “Combating Auto Retail Scams” Rule

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has announced the finalization of the new Combating Auto Retail Scams (CARS) rule designed to prevent auto dealers from utilizing bait-and-switch tactics and hidden junk fees. While these are technically illegal already, CARS is supposed to give the FTC more leeway in determining what constitutes fraud and serve as a warning to dealers that may be crossing the line.


New rules have been accompanied by some business guidance entitled FTC CARS Rule: Combating Auto Retail Scams – A Dealers Guide to encourage dealers to adhere closely to the letter of the law. This paper is supposed to explain “long-standing principles of truth in advertising and fair dealing apply when people go car shopping.”


The FTC says these efforts are designed to “add truth and transparency to the car buying and leasing process by making it clear that certain deceptive or unfair practices are illegal,” basically making CARS a promise to consumers that the government still understands how business is supposed to be conducted.


From the FTC:


The CARS Rule is a big win for consumers, who can expect that established standards of truth and transparency that apply in other consumer transactions will also apply when they’re looking to buy or lease a car. What’s more, now they can point to specific legal provisions that will help protect them in the process. If consumers see that a dealer is complying with the CARS Rule, it adds a measure of confidence. But if they spot a dealer who flouts those protections, consumers may take their business elsewhere.
The CARS Rule also is a big win for honest industry members who already implement the Rule’s principles of truth and transparency at their dealerships. Most salespeople can recount a story of losing a sale to a cross-town competitor who used questionable tactics to lure away a prospective customer. That shouldn’t happen. Dealers who work hard to treat customers fairly shouldn’t have to go head-to-head against competitors who resort to deception to close a deal. The CARS Rule establishes clear rules of the road that apply to all car dealers – meaning that consumers will be able to comparison shop based on truthful claims about price, financing, and service. When all dealers are held to the same clear standards, dealers who meet (or exceed) consumers’ expectations have a fair shot at winning the sale, gaining customers’ loyalty, and earning a word-of-mouth reputation as the dealer to do business with. Another benefit is that the CARS Rule accomplishes these goals without requiring consumers or dealers to fill out more paperwork. 


And here I thought dealers were already supposed to be held to the same standards.


The new rules (if we can call them that) can be broken down into four parts. CARS makes it illegal to “misrepresent certain topics” that might affect a person’s buying or leasing decision. This includes things like price, financing options, and fees.


Dealers are also required to disclose their asking price in full. Exceptions can be made for select government incentives (e.g. electric vehicle subsidies). This also prohibits retailers from breaking things down to monthly payment without explaining how much the vehicle will cost in total. If add-ons do come up, the dealer likewise has to be clear that they aren’t required.


Said add-ons also have to offer some tangible benefit. Customers are not allowed to be charged extra for features that do nothing. Though we imagine this one will be tricky to navigate due to the vague language and the fact that modern automobiles are already loaded up with pointless junk.


The last item pertains to consent. Dealers are required to get express, informed permission before charging customers for literally anything. This one is designed to avoid hidden fees. It’s straightforward enough. But we imagine extra sketchy dealers might circumvent this one with extra paperwork.


For those curious about the finer details of the above provisions, check out the FTC’s comprehensive outline of the CARS rule. However, don’t expect it to automatically save you from dealer shenanigans. The above behaviors are already supposed to be illegal. It seems that the FTC has simply caught wind of how aggressive dealers have gotten in recent years and is hoping to remind them to play fair while offering upset consumers peace of mind.


The CARS Rule will be formally implemented on July 30, 2024. It’s designed to provide protection for all consumers. However, the language pertains exclusively to “covered motor vehicle dealers,” which would include state-licensed automotive retailers. This likely creates a gray area for motorcycles, watercraft, and recreational vehicles. Don’t assume they’ll be privy to the same protections.


[Image: Gretchen Gunda Enger/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • TheEndlessEnigma TheEndlessEnigma on Dec 14, 2023

    The ultimate power is with the customer/buyer and that power is a simple word, "No". Dealer tells me they have a mandatory fee, "No". Dealer tells me Lojack is required on each vehicle, they cannot remove it, "No". Dealer tells me they add a required equipment package to each vehicle, "No". I tell the dealer they are required to show me line items details as part of quoting me a price. They don't do it, "No". The word "No" works wonders. Any given dealer needs you as a customer more than you need them to sell you a car. Make them work to earn your sale, never behave like you have to work to convince them to sell you a car. Say No and say it often.

  • Max Frisson Max Frisson on Dec 27, 2023

    There is a scary trend today of providing the customer with all the documents on a memory stick [thumb drive].

    The law should require all original paper documents. I got a LoJack charge on a car without seeing it in the papers I signed. I got the fee back and they will remove the device.

    But I do not remember seeing that at signing and didn't see it until I closely reviewed the 18 pages of documents on the memory stick.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next