Union Bargaining Begins in Detroit

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The United Auto Workers (UAW) is commencing contract negotiations with General Motors, Stellantis, and the Ford Motor Company this week. Members of the union’s executive board, along with UAW President Shawn Fain, appeared outside Stellantis' Sterling Heights Assembly Plant early Wednesday morning to draw attention to the talks.

The plan is to see each manufacturer as a preamble to the formal negotiations, which technically begin on Friday. But the union is also desperate to show itself in a better light after expansive corruption scandals implicated some of its now-ousted top brass. For most people living in North America, wages haven’t kept pace with the cost of living and inflationary pressures are exacerbating the issue. If there was ever a time to get the American public back on the side of unions, it’s now.


Wednesday’s press event was a little unusual for the UAW. Normally, contract negotiations are launched with little fanfare. But Fain and friends have said they want to do things differently since assuming control. They don’t even plan on choosing a singular manufacturer on which to focus, despite this being the norm for years. Instead, the union plans on dealing with all three companies simultaneously.


"The strike target is the Big 3," Fain said on Wednesday. "If the Big 3's not going to come to the pump for workers, there's going to be issues."


He’s been promising to stay in close contact with union members and appears willing to play hardball if manufacturers aren’t willing to compromise. While the union has shown itself as willing to strike in recent years, high-profile bribery scandals have undermined its credibility as an organization.


Though it’s not as though the UAW hasn’t enjoyed any wins. The union has managed to negotiate wage increases and limits to the number of temporary employees an automaker can employ. But concessions have also been made in recent years and it could be argued that the overall trajectory for factory workers has been pretty bleak since the early 2000s — if not earlier. 


"Since the Great Recession, we haven't gained, really, anything," Fain explained to the media. "And the companies have made a quarter of a trillion dollars in profits in the last decade."


Automotive News reported that the union head appeared on Facebook Live Tuesday evening to request members fill out support cards. The cards include contact information so the union can keep workers informed on bargaining updates and how they can help. Fain has said he wanted to keep members better appraised than his predecessors had and seems more willing to leverage them into pushing back against the industry.


"We've got to stop this can't-do mentality," he said. "The question I need you to think about is, 'How far are you willing to go to win the contract you deserve?'”


Getting more could be a tall order, however. Offshoring jobs has proven lucrative for domestic manufacturers. Automotive News even released a report suggesting that Ford boasting more U.S. workers than GM or Stellantis places it at a $1 billion annual cost disadvantage.


From AN:


Ford employs roughly 57,000 union workers in the U.S., about 11,000 more than GM and 16,500 more than Stellantis. It has created or retained 14,000 UAW jobs — 5,600 more than it had committed to — since signing its current contract with the union in 2019.
The automaker also has invested $1.4 billion more than what's outlined in the current four-year pact and converted roughly 14,100 temporary workers to permanent status since 2019.
The contract calls for temporary workers to represent no more than 8 percent of Ford's hourly work force; they are currently only 3 percent. Ford is believed to have a significantly lower percentage of temporary workers than GM or Stellantis.
Ford enters its negotiations with the UAW, which formally begin Friday, looking to build on those job and investment commitments. But it's also seeking ways to manage costs and maintain flexibility in its manufacturing footprint as it transitions to electric vehicles.
Compared to foreign automakers that have nonunion workers, Ford has a roughly $9-an-hour labor cost gap. All in, the company said it spends an average of $112,000 on wages and benefits per hourly worker.


Meanwhile, the UAW is expected to push for wage increases and additional benefits for its members. Despite Ford’s bottom line not being quite as robust of late, Shawn Fain has argued that all three Detroit automakers have enjoyed record profits in recent years and should be able to meet the union’s demands while still turning a profit.


He has likewise expressed his intention to reinstate cost-of-living adjustments that were dropped during the 2008 recession and to end a tiered wage system that takes workers years to reach top pay of about $32 an hour.


[Image: UAW]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 37 comments
  • JamesGarfield JamesGarfield on Jul 25, 2023

    There's a guy here in TX named Randy Adams. He has a car dealership here, and puts on a somewhat interesting radio show on local talk radio.


    Last night, this guy said he strongly expects there's gonna be a huge autoworkers strike in September, which will choke new car inventory even worse than the pandemic did.


    Anybody heard any evidence to support this?

  • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Aug 11, 2023

    Fain: Where's you're f***ng money?

  • 28-Cars-Later I thought today's young people weren't even getting licenses to drive, so which is it?
  • 28-Cars-Later Either last year or the year before I was discussing how The Dytopia™'s BEV schemes do not scale simply because the existing grid cannot generate enough power to replace ICE and the gigantic investment necessary in the grid was not forthcoming (Zelensky needed another house in Miami Beach after all you b!gots). So it struck me the only path to sort of do it is natural gas which became abundantly cheap 15 years ago because of fracking. Fast forward to more recently and surprise surprise we're attacking civilian use of natural gas out of nowhere for very little benefit. I couldn't find any good data to break down natural gas consumption between industrial use and civilian use, but spitballing I'd say the two largest chunks would be power generation and heating followed by small slices for other industrial use and home appliances- the latter probably being 5% or less (on my own gas bill its about 3-10% for the non furnace gas use depending on laundry loads). Some argued The Dystopia wanted to take away any energy freedom the proles have outside of electricity which they control on their whims, but I'm thinking that small number is optimal for them to take back because it doesn't force any additional infrastructure cost to gain (i.e. the low hanging fruit). As more power plants are spun up I expect a slow consolidation away from civilian nat gas because ManBearPig or whatever other fairy tale, but its really to power the gilded electronic cage they are constructing out of this once great nation. Seriously, break this down:Self lubricating Diesel engine with conventional OTS components, built for more than a ten year lifespan and 1m or more miles of use which can quickly be refueled at hundreds of locations (or fuel be brought to them). Pure BEV with some large amount of rare earths with a ten (?) year lifespan and perhaps 1m miles use but which has an avg daily downtime of 2 hours (?) to refuel and must be powered by a limited number of natural gas stations at static points (theoretically you could put a diesel fuel depot anywhere must faster and refill it with trucks). Other than ManBearPig fiction, your only savings in emissions is whatever the DEF isn't catching now (which is up to 90% in civilian diesel use per JLR) minus whatever emissions sins the nat gas burning creates. Think about how ridiculous all of this is to save 10-20% of emissions of only heavy trucks (BEV ships aren't ever going to be a thing) and you still have to frack like mad to have the natural gas to do it which would create the diesel in the first place. What is the nonsense?
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X The only vehicle from Chi-nah I'd be interested in would be a LR Defender or MB G-Wagon knock off with Chinese uniqueness.
  • FreedMike I'd be willing to look at a Chinese built car if Chinese companies were building them domestically.
  • SCE to AUX Hydrogen is the worst 'green' fuel there is - highly inefficient to produce, troublesome to distribute, and extremely expensive.
Next