2023 Detroit Auto Show Recap – Where Have All the Cars Gone?

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

The press day at the 2023 Detroit Auto Show was so quiet that I ended my day two states away – sleeping in my own bed in Chicago.

My initial hotel reservation was for two nights, but as early as last week I knew I’d be booking it west on I-94 after lunchtime.


It’s a far cry from my early years covering the show, when Cobo Hall (now Huntington Place) was swarmed by every industry worker from the top executives on down for several freezing cold days in January.

What was notable about this year’s media day was what was missing. Press conferences, for one – there were only three, along with a fourth reveal the night before. A lot of the PR folks and media members were not in attendance – some were at home and others were off on a first-drive program. Time was no one would dare to set a first drive against the show.

Even the looming potential of a UAW strike didn’t seem to bring in extra media.

I’ve said it before and I will say it again – I have no worries about the future of auto shows as public events. People will happily pay to check out cars with minimal interference from salespeople. From what I understand, most shows don’t publicly share their financials, but my anecdotal observations seem to suggest that folks are buying tickets – and that includes this post-pandemic period.

I believe as long as people can buy cars, they will pay to attend auto shows. That’s especially true for in-market shoppers and car enthusiasts, but for some folks, it’s just something to do.

Media days, however, are tricky. COVID-19 – and its effects on the industry, including supply-chain disruptions, certainly didn’t help, but the real reason media days are faltering is that automakers can host a one-off event somewhere and capture the news cycle for days instead of hours. Obviously, the ability to livestream an event via the Internet helps, too, but that could be done from an auto show, so there’s more at play.

That said, I do think that the New York and Los Angeles shows will continue to have a solid media day going forward. There’s a lot of non-automotive media in NYC – business journalists included – and they’ll swarm Javits every spring. Los Angeles is simply a large market with a strong car culture and a lot of well-heeled buyers. LA also seems to be the place for a lot of EV launches, due to California’s positioning on electric vehicles.

Chicago – full disclosure, I’ve done some work for the group that runs the show in the past – is a trickier one to predict. The public show is solid, but the media preview has struggled for a long time (in part because Detroit was so dominant). I could see it rebounding a bit just because Chicago’s size and reputation as a world-class city give PR folks more options to try to impress media at off-site events.

Detroit, though – one would think that with such a heavy industry presence in the area, and so many members of the automotive media making southeast Michigan their home, it would remain a no-brainer for the show to have a strong media preview, no matter what the other shows were doing, or what time of year the show was slated for, or how technology and PR strategy changes the way OEMs choose to launch a new model.

But for whatever reason, that wasn’t the case this year. To be fair, product cycles play a part. Next year could be a stronger show. But I am not betting on it.

It was bizarre walking around the show floor and not seeing even the usual weirdness. I had hoped to document some bizarre stuff for a post – maybe the Michelin man would be wandering, or I could sample a latte at each luxury stand and post a gently mocking review – but no dice. Just dominance from the Detroit Three and Toyota, with the luxury brands shunted into a corner while a test track covered half the floor. The only coffee I saw was at Lincoln’s booth, and it was damn good.

I don’t want to sound like some old-school writer whining about the bygone days of the Firehouse parties. Yes, that sort of stuff is fun, but we journos will be just as happy to socialize at some static unveiling in some random city. What worries me a bit more is this – is the lack of strong auto-show media days concerning for the state of the industry?

As I noted above, it may be nothing to be alarmed about, unless you work for one of the groups that manages an auto show. It may be, as I wrote earlier, that automakers are simply changing their PR strategy to do more off-sites, both during an auto-show week and at random times during the year, because they get a lot more attention for a lot less money. If that’s the case, it doesn’t mean the industry is in bad health – just that the location of new-car reveals has changed.

Still, it doesn’t feel great that what was once the social event of the season – shoutout to Clerks – has been reduced to such a size that at least one PR person I chatted with was surprised I bothered to travel to Michigan. Hey, what can I say? I do like Coney dogs and Vernor’s.

Perhaps the days of cattle in the streets, Jeeps driving through glass, and celebrities hobnobbing with starstruck bloggers at the Westin Book Cadillac are over. That’s not all bad – sometimes the spectacle outshined the cars. But if the Detroit Auto Show – or any auto show, really – wants to retain the same spotlight that was enjoyed as recently as half a decade or so ago, work needs to be done.

Otherwise, automakers, who have no real loyalty to anyone or anything other than the bottom line, will pay for stands to show their wares to the public but not a penny more for media-day press conferences. They’ll continue to shift that budget to off-site unveils.

While it can be annoying at times, I generally enjoy the drive to Detroit, especially this time of year. I hope to continue doing it once a year for the Detroit Auto Show.

Next time, hopefully, there will be a reason to stay awhile.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 26 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Sep 15, 2023

    Detroit moved their show to avoid being scooped by the L.A. show in December, but I don't know if that will help.

  • Zippito Zippito on Oct 26, 2023

    Detroit Auto Show recap sheds light on the dwindling importance of traditional auto shows. The lackluster atmosphere and sparse media participation underscore the industry's shift towards alternative strategies. But sometimes it's difficult to catch up what author wrote, click here now to see professional writers help, if you need it for your content. It's evident that automakers prefer hosting individual events, often with online streaming, to garner prolonged media attention. While auto shows might continue as popular public events, their significance for media coverage seems to be waning.

  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
  • Ajla Remember when Cadillac introduced an entirely new V8 and proceeded to install it in only 800 cars before cancelling everything?
  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
  • Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
Next