2023 Kia Sportage Hybrid EX Review – Urban Crossover, Right Price

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2023 Kia Sportage Hybrid EX AWD Fast Facts

Powertrain
1.6-liter turbocharged four-cylinder (177 horsepower @ 5,500 RPM; 195 lb-ft of torque 1,500-4,500 RPM) paired with permanent magnet synchronous electric motor (59.3 horsepower @ 1,600-2,000 RPM; 195 lb-ft of torque 0-2,100 RPM) and hybrid starter gen
Transmission/Drive Wheel Layout
Eight-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPG
38 city / 38 highway / 38 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, L/100km
6.1 city / 6.3 highway / 6.2 combined. (NRCan Rating)
Base Price
$30,990 US / $45,895 CAN
As-Tested Price
$33,860 US / $48,833 CAN
Prices include $1,215 destination charge in the United States and $2,649 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

You might remember that when yours truly flew to California last year to drive the 2023 Kia Sportage, I didn’t get to spend more than five minutes in the hybrid version. I spent most of my day in the X-Pro, which I was lukewarm about.

A full week with the hybrid showed me I was, indeed, missing out.


The X-Pro Sportage is for “light” off-roading while the hybrid is for urban and suburban commuters, and it’s well-suited to that role. So well-suited, in fact, that I put it on my list of “if I needed a brand-new crossover, I’d consider buying this”.

The hybrid pairs a 1.6-liter turbocharged four-cylinder (177 horsepower, 195 lb-ft of torque) with a permanent synchronous electric motor that makes 59.3 horsepower and 195 lb-ft of torque. There's also a starter/generator motor that makes 17.3 hp and 31.9 lb-ft of torque. The resulting 277 system horsepower and 258 system lb-ft of torque (remember, the numbers from the gas engine and electric motor(s) ARE NOT simply added together for system power, it’s more complicated than that) are plenty to give the Sportage a sprightly feel around town – and you don’t even need to engage Sport mode to get some grins, though it helps immensely.

The juice is supplied by a 1.49 kWh lithium-ion battery. An eight-speed automatic transmission gets the power to the all-wheel drive system.

Acceleration is one thing, ride and handling are another. The Sportage is engaging, despite a bit too much artificialness in its steering feel, and it’s sporty enough to stave off crossover-induced depression. Ride is not sacrificed. If you need a crossover and don’t want to be fighting the boredom that these ‘utes so often bring about, the Sportage Hybrid is worth a look.

Of course, sportiness only gets you so far in crossover land. Even the enthusiast is looking for other positive traits that have little to do with cornering prowess. The Kia delivers here, too, thanks to a comfy cabin that blends functionality and design nicely. Even the sloping rear roofline doesn’t eat too much into rear headroom.

Kia manages to make an all-digital display work – though as is the case with any of these screen-heavy interiors, I wonder about repair costs. It helps that Kia’s infotainment system is simple and intuitive to use.

There is a disturbing lack of knobs and buttons, but the setup works well enough that once you’ve gotten the hang of things – and it doesn’t take long – you can do what you need/want to do while minimizing distraction from the duty of driving. Kia’s neat little swap system – swap between audio and HVAC controls at the touch of a button – helps here, though it does occasionally confound. Do you want the cabin to be cold, or Foreigner’s “Cold as Ice” to play? A certain percentage of the time, you’ll get it wrong, though with time that improves.

At least the heated seats are button controlled. On the disappointing side, my mid-trim EX tester is saddled with dummy buttons for a function that’s not there – I am guessing cooled seats. No one likes being trim-shamed, and it’s obvious that EX buyers couldn’t or wouldn’t pony up more cash for the upper-trim Sportage. Some materials felt a bit cheap, though.

If it looks like I am struggling to pick nits, well, I am. TTAC made its name on calling out the bad, and there’s just not a lot to work with here when it comes to that. The entire package is well put together, balancing fun-to-drive, functionality, and fuel economy. All at a reasonable price.

That’s where I thought this review might turn south – perhaps Kia was shortchanging EX buyers and forcing those who wanted comfort and convenience to shell out too much coin for an SX-Prestige top-trim model. But a quick glance at the spec sheets shows that unless I missed something, the only major features one would want that force you to pony up for an SX-Prestige are cooled seats, real leather seats instead of artificial leather ones, and more advanced driver-aid systems.

This means that for $30K you get standard features like forward-collision assist, lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist, driver-attention warning, dual-zone climate control, Android Auto, Apple CarPlay, heated front seats, and keyless entry. Opting for an EX over the LX adds 18-inch wheels (instead of 17s), LED turn signals, UVO infotainment, blind-spot and rear cross-traffic collision-avoidance assist, navigation, push-button start, satellite radio, heated steering wheel, and rear USB ports.

The only options on my tester were a package that added a sunroof and hands-free liftgate, and carpeted floor mats.

Total price? $33,860 with destination.

Kia’s biggest problem here isn’t anything related to the Sportage per se – it’s that most of the competitive set is strong. Most of the alternatives on offer are also well-rounded, though some are going to cost more when similarly equipped. There are a lot of good choices at this size and price point.

That said, the Sportage Hybrid is fun-to-drive, fuel-efficient (38 mpg combined -- though I was seeing lower numbers. Perhaps we've found another flaw), and put together well. Those who want to go off-road and overland will look elsewhere – and will likely be let down by the X-Pro version – but the city-dwellers and suburbanites will be well served to give this a long look.

What’s New for 2023

The 2023 Kia Sportage is completely redesigned.

Who Should Buy It

Those seeking a well-rounded city crossover at a reasonable price.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 31 comments
  • Brandon Brandon on Jun 07, 2023

    What is a "city crossover"?

  • Mebgardner Mebgardner on Jul 12, 2023

    I have not been shopping the H/K gas models because of what I read was a problem with their motors failing too quickly. I think partially due to engine block reaming shavings not being completely removed by an american castings manufacturer. Is the "all clear" being sounded? Their gas motor problems are behind them?

  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
  • Ajla Remember when Cadillac introduced an entirely new V8 and proceeded to install it in only 800 cars before cancelling everything?
  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
  • Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
Next