China's Huawei Establishes ‘Smart Car’ Unit With Changan Auto

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Huawei has announced it will continue becoming intertwined with the automotive sector after signing onto a joint venture with Chinese state-owned carmaker Changan Automobile. The telecommunications giant has established Shenzhen Yinwang Intelligent Technology with a registered capital of 1 billion yuan ($140 million USD) and a focus on smart car equipment manufacturing, artificial intelligence system integration services, and AI software development.


According to the South China Morning Post, the new unit is wholly owned by Huawei and will be used to help transfer technology between the phone company and Changan Auto. The telecom firm previously said that the plan would be to “integrate the core technologies and resources of [Huawei’s] smart car solutions into the new company.”


The firm declined to comment on the relationship between the new entity and the agreement it signed with Changan in November.


From the South China Morning Post:


In November, Richard Yu Chengdong, CEO of Huawei’s consumer business group and chairman of its Intelligent Automotive Solution business unit, called on Chinese carmakers Seres Group, Chery Automobile, JAC Motors and BAIC Motor to take an equity stake in the Huawei-Changan JV.
All four of these companies — generally considered smaller carmakers in the country — currently partner with Huawei to develop and sell new brands under the so-called Huawei Select model, through which the smartphone giant collaborates closely with companies on everything from product design to sales. These brands include Aito with Seres and Luxeed with Chery.


While this arrangement yields roughly the same level of importance as if Microsoft or Apple had a joint partnership to develop automotive tech, it has to be said that the outlet is known for over-hyping regional businesses and effectively serves as propaganda for the Chinese government. However, one could make similar arguments about select Western outlets and bias certainly doesn’t mean the reporting defaults as false. Still, particular attention should always be given to framing of any article. 


Huawei has been getting involved with loads of industries in a bid to see its technology become the foundation of smart devices that leverage connectivity to monopolize user data, create new revenue streams, and provide additional opportunities for government surveillance. We’ve seen something similar taking place in Western markets as “smart devices” became commonplace and automotive connectivity was standardized. But Huawei has been sanctioned by the United States, meaning whatever tech it develops for cars likely won’t be making it to our shores.


Changan has also said that the telecom giant had promised not to manufacture cars on its own while the joint venture was in effect. Most of the work will be focused on developing new cockpits using novel interfaces (likely touch screens and augmented reality displays) that take into account artificial intelligence and voice command. The duo are reportedly still in discussions as to exactly what that entails. But they’re already making room for other automakers to jump aboard the program — which is currently using the working title “Newcool.”


With the Chinese government encouraging all automakers to get under the umbrella, they’re effectively obligated to jump aboard the program. A large portion of domestic brands already have working partnerships with Huawei and there seems to be a state-backed push for that trend to continue.


[Image: Huawei]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
 4 comments
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Kwik_Shift_Pro4X on Jan 18, 2024

    Coming to your 15 Minute City soon.

    • See 2 previous
    • 1995_SC 1995_SC on Jan 19, 2024

      Try the Gulag. I'm sure you guys will get scolded by our resident CCP apologists on this site



  • Akear Stellantis is a lost cause in America. Why does anybody care?
  • Redapple2 UAW may have a valid issue. I ve been in plants that were bad. ....and i greatly dislike the UAW. I may need a 3/4 ton pick up. It will be a hecho Ram gas.
  • TheMrFreeze So basically no manual transmissions in US cars after 2029.I just raised one finger in the general direction of NHTSB's main office. Guess which finger it is!
  • TheMrFreeze Wife drives a Fiat 500 Turbo 5-speed (135hp vs. 160 in the Abarth), it's a lot of fun to drive and hasn't given us any headaches. Maintenance on it is not as bad as you'd think for such a cramped engine compartment...Fiat did put some thought into it in that regard. Back seat is...cramped...but the front is surprisingly roomy for what it is.I honestly wouldn't mind having one myself, but yeah, gotta have a manual trans.
  • Bkojote Tesla's in a death spiral right now. The closest analog would be Motorola circa 2007.The formula is the exact same. -Vocal CEO who came in and took credit for the foundation their predecessor while cutting said efforts behind successful projects.-A heavy reliance on price/margin cuts and heavy subsidies to keep existing stock moving. The RAZR became a $99 phone after starting out as a $399 phone, the same way a Model 3 is now a $25k car.-Increasing focus on BS projects over shipping something working and functional to distract shareholders from the failures of current products. Replace "iTunes Phone" (remember that?) with "Cybertruck" and when that's a dud focus on "Java-Linux" the same way they're now focusing "Robotaxis".-Increasingly cut away investment in quality-of-ownership things. Like Motorola, Tesla's cut cut cut away their development, engineering, and support teams. If you ever had the misfortune of using a Motorola Q you're familiar with just how miserable Tesla Autopilot is these days.-Ship less and less completed products as a preview of something new. Time and time again at CES/Trade Shows Motorola was showing half-working 'concept' devices. The Cybertruck was announced 5 years ago yet functionally is missing most of its features- and the ones it has don't work. And I mean basic stuff- the AWD logic is embarrassingly primitive. A lot of Tesla hyperbole focuses on either he's a 4D-chess playing genius visionary or all of Tesla's being propped up by gov't mandates. But the reality is this company hasn't delivered any meaningful product evolution in the better half of this past decade.
Next