2023 Kia EV6 GT Review – Generating Grins

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2023 Kia EV6 GT Fast Facts

Powertrain
Front and rear electric motors (576 horsepower @ N/A RPM; 545 lb-ft of torque @ N/A RPM)
Transmission
Automatic, gear-reduction unit
Fuel Economy, MPGe
85 city / 74 highway / 79 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, Le/100km
2.8 city / 3.2 highway / 3.0 combined (NRCan Rating)
Estimated Range
206 miles/332 kilometers
Base Price
$61,400 (U.S.) / $75,995 (Canada)
As-Tested Price
$62,865 (U.S.) / $79,442.71 (Canada)
Prices include $1,295 destination charge in the United States and $3,049 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

Nearly 600 horsepower in any vehicle can do a lot to make a person happy. Nearly 600 horsepower in a silent EV with instant torque can make a person feel like they’ve ingested a bunch of amphetamines.


That’s the appeal of the 2023 Kia EV6 GT. Normally, when you hear the call of the open road, you might seek out a traditional sports car, but this EV turns that notion inside out.

It’s not perfect – it’s probably more of a straight-line sportster than a true corner carver – and it is a tad pricey. Probably too pricey for some. But all that is easy to forget when you tromp the accelerator and summon a case of the giggles with the acceleration on tap. Just be careful not to summon a member of your town’s police department for a nice little wallet-lightening “chat.”

It may not be a true corner carver, but that doesn’t mean it’s terrible when faced with a curvy road. It simply has some limitations and certain flaws that become apparent when pushed hard. When pushing at a lower effort, the EV6 GT is fun enough. Its height, hatchback body style, and slightly heavy curb weight don’t leech too much fun away. Sport and GT mode make things even more fun, and the use of one-pedal driving is a nice brake-saver that also helps with car control.

Push harder, however, and body roll rears its ugly head and the tires sing a little too soon. Artificial, slightly numb steering saps from the experience, though turn-in is nice and sharp.

You also sacrifice some ride comfort to go for a GT – it’s definitely a stiffer-riding vehicle that the normal EV6. That’s likely to happen anytime you opt for a higher-performance model.

Another tradeoff? Manually adjustable seats that were a tad too stiff on longer drives for my taste.

At least the brakes are stout and the acceleration can make up for speed lost in corners. For those wondering, the front suspension is a MacPherson strut setup with dual lower arms and outback it's a multi-link setup.

Peeling back the curtain on the spec sheet, the EV6 GT makes 576 horsepower, 545 lb-ft of torque, and is all-wheel drive via the use of dual electric motors (160 kW front, 230 kW rear). The lithium-ion battery pack has 77.4 kWh of energy. Find a 350 kW charger and you can get 80 percent of charge back in 18 minutes – it’s closer to 73 minutes on 50 kW units.

The cabin is a decent place to do business, with adequate front head- and legroom for most adults, and I like how the gauges sweep into the infotainment screen. Like most new Kias, one can easily switch the controls from audio to HVAC with a button press.

Standard or available features include Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, heated front seats, heated steering wheel, Meridian audio, Wi-Fi hotspot, navigation, Bluetooth, vehicle-to-load charging, head-up display, cargo-area power outlet, power sunroof, dual-zone automatic climate control, wireless device charging, multiple USB ports, and keyless entry/starting.

Safety systems include blind-spot monitoring, blind-spot collision avoidance, driver-attention warning, rear cross-traffic collision avoidance, forward-collision avoidance, lane-following assist, lane-keep assist, high beam assist, smart cruise control, and turn-signal-activated cameras.

My test car had a base price of $61,400 and just one option – carpeted floor mats at $170. So with destination, the as-tested price came out to $62,865.

That’s a lot of cheddar for a hatchback Kia EV – even one with this much performance. It’s not exactly a Sunset Strip cruiser. That price may make some buyers think twice.

For those aren’t put off by the price, they’ll get acceleration in spades and handling that’s fun enough until it isn’t. It’s a neat trick, and outside of a stiff ride and too-stiff seats, the comfort and convenience sacrifice isn’t huge.

Trying to wrap your brain around the performance-for-price equation may turn you inside out, but given the smile-inducing thrust available, this is one rendezvous that won’t leave you feeling empty inside.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC, Kia]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 76 comments
  • Arthur Dailey Agree with @Jeff, if you needed a cheap vehicle that was relatively robust and last a long time and you did not care about driving dynamics you could do worse than a J-Car. They as the saying go, drove badly, for a long time. They were less rust prone than many Japanese imports, and either more reliable or more robust than many (most) European or Korean autos. And parts were cheap and repairs relatively simple. As he writes, we complain about the lack of inexpensive, basic autos but then criticize autos that were inexpensive and basic. As the saying goes 'you can get cheap, fast or good, but you cannot get all 3 in the same product'.
  • Bd2 Overpriced food, awful home furnishings, endless assortments of sugary candy and drinks which are mostly garbage and childish gimmicks galore. Indeed, the most "American" of traditions.
  • SCE to AUX Some pretty big strikes:[list][*]Drivetrain - how can a straight-6 be thrashy? Shame on you, Mazda.[/*][*]Poor fuel economy.[/*][*]Tire noise.[/*][*]Poor user interface.[/*][*]That colored dash is a bit garish for me.[/*][*]High price.[/*][*]Indistinct look in the Mazda lineup. Their SUVs are Russian nesting dolls.[/*][*]Nothing compelling to lure a buyer away from the bigger brands.[/*][/list]I don't see this moving the needle for Mazda in the US market.
  • Ash78 Dear unions, thank you for your service and for expressing interest in our automotive factories. Due to your many decades of pressuring employers to do better, the more adept companies have gotten your message and have implemented most of your demands preemptively in order to maintain a better employer-employee relationship than the manufacturing industry as a whole.We truly appreciate your feedback and interest, and all it has done to improve employer relations since the industrial revolution. We take your concerns seriously and will be glad to reach back out if our situation changes.We will keep your resume on file for three years, per company policy.Sincerely,Everyone
  • Theflyersfan I'm having a tough time figuring out Mazda's recent lineup decisions. I've mentioned before how having the CX-5 and CX-50 makes no sense as it seems like they would steal each other's sales instead of conquest sales from other brands. And now here comes the CX-70 vs 90 decision. If Mazda wanted to position the 70 above the 90 with pricing, I think they should have gone the Audi Q7 vs Q8 route. The Q8 costs more, has one fewer row, and is smaller on the inside, but has the more aggressive styling and tries to position itself as the sportier alternative large CUV in their lineup. With Mazda, the 70 and 90 seem to be in the position, like the 5 vs 50, to steal each other's sales. There isn't anything compelling me to get a 70 if I get more for my money with a 90, except 100,000 miles down the road, I won't have a folded up third row seat rattling around loosely. Mazda should have brought over the CX-60 and position that where they wanted the 70. I understand it's a touch larger than the X3, Q5, and GLC CUVs, which is a sweet spot in that market. Make the CX-70 a sportier alternative 2-row instead of such a blatant cynical move of just ripping a seat out of the 90, calling it an all new model and price it in the same ballpark. I want Mazda to succeed and continue to be independent, but decisions like these make me wonder what their future plans are.
Next