Guess Who's Back -- 2024 Toyota Land Cruiser Marks Return of an Iconic Name

by Tim Healey

Published: August 1st, 2023

guess who s back 2024 toyota land cruiser marks return of an iconic name

Toyota's Land Cruiser is back after three years. And it will have a base price in the mid-$50,000s.

There will be just one powertrain -- an i-Force Max hybrid setup that pairs a 2.4-liter four-cylinder with a 48-horsepower electric motor that's juiced by a 1.87-kWh NiMH battery pack. The electric motor will be integrated into the eight-speed automatic transmission. The stated total system power numbers are 326 horsepower and 465 lb-ft of torque.

Fuel-economy numbers will be announced at a later date.

A 12.3-inch infotainment screen will get the latest Toyota infotainment system, and a First Edition model that will be limited to 5,000 units will come with rounded LED headlamps that have a retro design, a roof rack, roof rails, two new two-tone paint schemes, special off-road features, and a different interior design.

Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 -- the company's suite of advanced driver-aid systems -- will be standard across the board. The next Land Cruiser will use the TNGA-F platform. Toyota says that the ladder frame will offer more chassis rigidity than the outgoing model.

This new rig will be a tad smaller -- 4.4 inches narrower and 1.2 inches shorter -- than the outgoing model, with the idea that it will be a bit more nimble on the trails.

The Land Cruiser will be built in Japan, in both the Tahara and Hino plants, and it will go on sale in the U.S. in the spring of 2024.

A 1958 trim will also have retro headlights and a retro "Toyota" grille. Other trims will get slim, rectangular headlights. The body will be squared-off, the A-pillar will be pushed back for better versatility, and the front overhang is shortened for better off-road approaches.

The full-time four-wheel-drive system will have a center-locking differential and an available front stabilizer bar disconnect.

Toyota is promising an approach angle of 31.0 degrees and a max departure of 22 degrees, with a breakover angle of 25.0 inches. Ground clearance will be up to 8.7 inches.

Rock rails and skid plates are available, as are fog lamps and front tow hooks.

There will of course be all sorts of electronic trickery that can help drivers off-road, including a Crawl Control system that holds one of five steady speeds while the driver steers, drive modes for varied terrain, and a hill-descent control system.

Other available features include Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, heated and cooled seats, JBL audio, wi-fi hotspot, wireless device charging, dual USB-C ports, keyless entry and starting, power tailgate, digital key, head-up display, moonroof, 18-inch wheels, rear locking differential, heated steering wheel, leather seats, and digital rearview mirror.

Towing capacity is expected to be 6,000 pounds.

It appears three trims will be available -- 1958, Land Cruiser, and First Edition.

Safety Sense 3.0 will include a pre-collision system with pedestrian detection, lane-departure alert with steering assist, radar cruise control, lane-tracing assist, road-sign assist, automatic high beams, and proactive driving assist. Blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, and hill-start assist will be available.

It was never a secret that the Land Cruiser would return, and now it's official. Let us know what you think below.

[Images: Toyota]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#ToyotaLandCruiser #LandCruiser #Toyota #2024ToyotaLandCruiser #Newcars #FutureCars

Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 94 comments

Mebgardner on Aug 05, 2023

OK, thanks for the examples and info. I read into this thread that the split difference of opinion is based on the reliability of the new LC drivetrain, while under the rated (and significant) 6K lb towing load. No one seems to be arguing that this boosted 2.4 hybrid can not do it. It's a matter of how long it will do it before something breaks. Some are arguing it will tow that rated load fine for the life of the drivetrain, if geared and ventilated well and correctly. Some argue this boosted 2.4 hybrid (or something similar to it, but not really: Boosted ICE only, and somewhat bigger, examples) will be fine for intermittent duty at that load. Some argue that this LC drivetrain is not up to this towing task, at all. That it will fail early if used at all, at the rated load. Some say this new LC is not intended for towing, forgetaboutit, wrong target customer demographic (Off-Road, different use case discussion).

The opinions about the reliability at load are somewhat based on the perceived complexity of the "new" hybrid system. There is this large difference of opinion of perceived drivetrain complexity. That is, it's not all about size (but, yes that matters :) Some argue this LC hybrid is not any more complex that ICE by itself. Parts were removed (ie: tq converter), and different part took their place (M/G and battery). Others argue You Gotta Be Kidding Me, of course it's more complex. Counter argue with I Have Data to prove reliability based on the City Based Taxi Duty. All good stuff here, hopefully accurately summarized.

I'm keeping the "6K Lb Towing Duty" in view from here, as I give my worthless .02 opinion. I begin by writing that this i-Force Max is not the same as that stuffed in to the new upmarket Tundra / Sequoia. This is Not That. But. However. The new hybrid bits like the Power Split Device (PSD) embedded in the Hybrid Synergy Drive (HSD). This PSD coupling, which is a clutched planetary gearset, taking the place of the tq converter, is *likely* the same part as the one in the upmarket i-Force hybrid drivetrains. All the 2.4 ICE power has to go through the PSD. Then the transmission. The engine is not the same, thats for sure. The transmission, differentials, and axles? Probably not the same (LC .vs Sequoia / Tundra).

I believe it's disingenuous to say this hybrid drivetrain is of the same or less complexity as an ICE only. I admit I dont know where Toyota will get the drivetrain bits for this LC, either hybrid or the otherwise standard components. The frame is GTG, the 2.4L boosted ICE motor should be OK *For Occasional Duty* if it turns out to be correctly geared and ventilated, *AND* you dont mind it howling in low gear up tall grades, *AND* you dont mind doing it at 15 MPH for however long it takes. The rest of the bits? (trans, diffs, axles, couplings, CV joints etc), well we'll see I guess. Just keep the maintenance service up to schedule.

Like Reply
Tanzeel on Sep 16, 2023

Not appealing!

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.