Florida Governor Ron DeSantis Signs Bill Blocking Most Direct-to-Consumer Auto Sales

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Dealer franchise laws are controversial at best and downright divisive in most cases, but they remain a significant force in the automotive industry despite the political noise surrounding them. Florida governor and GOP presidential candidate Ron DeSantis recently joined the fray when he signed House Bill 637, legislation that blocks direct auto sales for most brands but not all. 


As Inside EVs pointed out, the bill’s language prohibits direct-to-consumer sales by automakers. However, those that don’t already have existing franchise agreements can, so brands like Tesla, Rivian, Lucid, and others. While that won’t be a significant change from the current automotive retail situation, the law could give those automakers a competitive advantage over legacy companies, as it lets them sell vehicles at lower prices without covering dealers’ overhead.


Calls to revise or nix dealer franchise laws have become louder recently, as car buyers have felt the wrath of inflation, supply chain shortages, and extreme demand for some models. Those conditions have given dealers an open door to raise prices on new and used vehicles, which has led some to question why automakers can’t bypass dealers and sell directly to consumers.


Dealer franchise laws prevent that in most cases. They are designed to protect buyers, and the National Auto Dealers Association (NADA) notes that they can also benefit manufacturers. While those claims are open to debate, the net effect on the average car buyer is that the choice is to buy from an established auto brand at a dealership or buy from an upstart EV company at a direct store.


There’s certainly a case to be made that local dealers play an important role in service and product support. Still, the remote service and mostly digital support programs offered by companies like Rivian have earned relatively solid reviews, and the brands’ customers are among the happiest respondents in surveys. 


[Image: Hunter Crenian via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Any carmaker that wants to sell direct-to-customer just has to create a new brand that only sells direct-to-customer.

    There are so many idiots in politics, probably because any sane person would know better than to enter politics. In Florida it's worse - any sane person would stay the hell away from that state.

  • Paul Paul on Nov 27, 2023

    Consumer's opinion in the matter counts for NADA.

  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonymous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
  • FreedMike I don't get the business case for these plug-in hybrid Jeep off roaders. They're a LOT more expensive (almost fourteen grand for the four-door Wrangler) and still get lousy MPG. They're certainly quick, but the last thing the Wrangler - one of the most obtuse-handling vehicles you can buy - needs is MOOOAAAARRRR POWER. In my neck of the woods, where off-road vehicles are big, the only 4Xe models I see of the wrangler wear fleet (rental) plates. What's the point? Wrangler sales have taken a massive plunge the last few years - why doesn't Jeep focus on affordability and value versus tech that only a very small part of its' buyer base would appreciate?
  • Bill Wade I think about my dealer who was clueless about uConnect updates and still can't fix station presets disappearing and the manufacturers want me to trust them and their dealers to address any self driving concerns when they can't fix a simple radio?Right.
Next