Opinion: Making Sense of the Stellantis Auto Show Decision

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

News broke earlier this week that Stellantis would pull out of auto shows, including the upcoming Chicago Auto Show, for the foreseeable future.


Now, to be clear, that decision is only from the corporate side – local dealers could still participate. We reached out to the Chicago Auto Show folks about that, and have not yet heard back.

We should also note that Stellantis will evaluate whether to attend or not attend any given show on a case-by-case basis.

Having one of the Detroit Three pull out of auto shows leads to ringing of alarm bells. Even if it’s just a temporary move. Especially since it wasn’t that long ago that previous versions of what is now Stellantis were known for putting on elaborate press conferences during media days (especially in Detroit). Even within the past few years, Camp Jeep was a huge attraction at auto shows. Indeed, Camp Jeep will be at the New York Auto Show this spring.

That said, the situation is a bit more complicated than “Stellantis is saving money because it’s in trouble!” and/or “auto shows are dead if automakers don’t want to display there!” and/or “auto shows must cost too much if automakers are pulling out!” and/or “the industry is in trouble a major automaker won’t spend money at auto shows!”

Sadly, we as a society don’t do nuance well.

I think there may be a few factors at play here. There may be lasting effects from last year’s prolonged UAW strike. Stellantis is trying to play catchup with electric vehicles. Stellantis is planning to invest almost $5 billion in its Belvidere, Illinois plant. Most of the company’s brands have little to show right now.

That last one matters a lot, I think. There’s a new Ram truck, but we’re hearing the first drive won’t be in time for Chicago. Dodge’s newest product, the Hornet, launched in March 2023, and the next Charger/Charger Daytona isn’t ready for production yet. Chrysler sells just one model right now. Jeep refreshed the Gladiator and Wrangler but neither are full redesigns and Jeep also killed off two models – Cherokee and Renegade. There’s not much new going on, at least at this second, at Fiat and Alfa.

So why would the company drop millions on a display, plus the liability costs of Camp Jeep, when there’s just not a ton new? Why not pour that money into Belvidere, EVs, and the recovery from any strike-associated losses/increased labor costs?

As for the auto-show angle, I will once again point out that auto shows are for consumers, not media. That said, it’s obviously going to hurt the consumer days if Stellantis isn’t there – even if local dealers step up.

It sounds scary when a big automaker that has long been a major part of auto shows – and seemed to become an even bigger part of shows in recent years as smaller brands sat out – decides to stay home. And unlike Stellantis’ decision to stay out of LA last fall and CES next week, there’s no ongoing strike to use as excuse. It’s over. Though, as noted above, fallout from the strike could be at least partly beyond the decision.

But I am not yet convinced that this move means Stellantis/auto shows/the automotive industry is doomed. Not yet. If Stellantis isn’t back at shows, or spending money on some sort of alternative like the Roadkill Nights event where the Demon 170 was unveiled last year, by this time in 2025, then maybe we can worry.

The world is changing, and that may change how automakers present to the media and consumers at auto shows. Still, I don’t yet think we should freak out about Stellantis taking a break.

I could be wrong. Occupational hazard of writing an op-ed. This could be the canary in the coal mine for a company that has been bailed out twice in my lifetime and always seems to be less stable than Ford or GM. Then again, the investment in a plant 90 minutes from where I am typing this would suggest that starting a Stellantis death watch, at least right now, might be folly.

It’s very easy, especially with today’s discourse environment, to have a hot take about any major news event. Sometimes, that’s appropriate. This news, however, requires a wait-and-see approach.

[Image: Stellantis/Jeep]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 40 comments
  • IH_Fever IH_Fever on Jan 08, 2024

    In a market that is mainly CUV's, pickups, and a few battery powered blobs, why spend any money to go to a show? Once you've seen one, you've seen them all. The one in Houston had such little product the last couple of years they've combined it with the boat show.

    • Jeff Jeff on Jan 08, 2024

      That is interesting that the Houston Auto Show is combined with the boat show. I do see the connection in that if you buy a bigger boat you might need to buy a newer bigger truck.


  • Bankerdanny Bankerdanny on Apr 30, 2024

    I used to love the Chicago show. I went to my first one around 1980 and didn't miss it for another 20 years. After college I would take some vacation time so I could go mid-week when the show was less crowded. But I think I have only gone twice in the past 10 years. There just isn't much that interests me any more and the Detroit 3 started emphasizing the Detroit show over Chicago, so we weren't getting the big debuts like we used to. Ticket prices are ridiculous and food and drink charges are slices of pizza at steak prices.

  • GregLocock They will unless you don't let them. Every car manufacturing country around the world protects their local manufacturers by a mixture of legal and quasi legal measures. The exception was Australia which used to be able to design and manufacture every component in a car (slight exaggeration) and did so for many years protected by local design rules and enormous tariffs. In a fit of ideological purity the tariffs were removed and the industry went down the plughole, as predicted. This was followed by the precision machine shops who made the tooling, and then the aircraft maintenance business went because the machine shops were closed. Also of course many of the other suppliers closed.The Chinese have the following advantagesSlave laborCheap electricityZero respect for IPLong term planning
  • MaintenanceCosts Yes, and our response is making it worse.In the rest of the world, all legacy brands are soon going to be what Volvo is today: a friendly Western name on products built more cheaply in China or in companies that are competing with China from the bottom on the cost side (Vietnam, India, etc.) This is already more or less the case in the Chinese market, will soon be the case in other Asian markets, and is eventually coming to the EU market.We are going to try to resist in the US market with politicians' crack - that is, tariffs. Economists don't really disagree on tariffs anymore. Their effect is to depress overall economic activity while sharply raising consumer prices in the tariff-imposing jurisdiction.The effect will be that we will mostly drive U.S.-built cars, but they will be inferior to those built in the rest of the world and will cost 3x-4x as much. Are you ready for your BMW X5 to be three versions old and cost $200k? Because on the current path that is what's coming. It may be overpriced crap that can't be sold in any other world market, but, hey, it was built in South Carolina.The right way to resist would be to try to form our own alliances with the low-cost producers, in which we open our markets to them while requiring adherence to basic labor and environmental standards. But Uncle Joe isn't quite ready to sign that kind of trade agreement, while the orange guy just wants to tell those countries to GFY and hitch up with China if they want a friend.
  • CEastwood Thy won't get recruits who want to become police officers . They'll get nuts who want to become The Green Hornet .
  • 1995 SC I stand by my assessment that Toyota put a bunch of "seasoned citizens" that cared not one iota about cars, asked them what they wanted and built it. This was the result. This thing makes a Honda Crosstour or whatever it was look like a Jag E type by comparison.
  • 1995 SC I feel like the people that were all in on EVs no longer are because they don't like Elon and that trump's (pun intended) any environmental concerns they had (or wanted to appear to have)
Next