Toyota's EV Battery Production Efforts are Looking Up

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Toyota may be pushing hard toward more diverse propulsion options instead of solely focusing on EVs, but that doesn’t mean it’s not looking for ways to make headway on electrification. The Japanese auto giant recently announced its acquisition of Primearth EV Energy from Panasonic, which it said would give it a significant boost toward EV battery mass production.


The company already owned 60 percent of Primearth, starting with a 40 percent stake when it was founded in 1996, climbing to 60 percent in 2005. In 2010, Toyota grabbed another 20.5 percent, so this recent announcement only really covers 19.5 percent of Primearth. Some of the automaker’s other partially-owned companies already produce hybrid batteries, and some build PHEV and EV batteries.


Toyota has announced a next-generation battery that it said can deliver up to 500 miles of range. It’s expected to roll the first market-ready units in 2026, and it noted that they would support super-fast charging, with times as low as 20 minutes. That could coincide with a next-gen bZ4X or the expected bZ small crossover’s release.


By 2028, Toyota expects to offer EV batteries with more than 621 miles of range and the same 20-minute charging time. They are also expected to cost 10 percent less than the batteries released in 2026.


Toyota has long promised upgraded batteries, but the automaker has so far not hit its targets, pushing solid-state batteries out as far as 2030. In the meantime, its cautious approach to EVs looks to be paying off, as other automakers have grappled with wavering demand and high costs.


[Image: Toyota]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 18 comments
  • Scott Scott on Mar 06, 2024

    Toyota is likely to go full Hybrid long before full EV (if ever) and that requires a lot of batteries so they need the capacity. The promised 500 mile range isn't the biggie, it's the 20 minute recharge time. That might mean you could add enough charge for 200-300 miles in 10 minutes which would end one of the real world problems.

  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Mar 06, 2024

    Batteries don't provide range - cars do.


    That mythical 621-mile range is 1000 km WLTP, which is more like 520 miles EPA... but what size car do you get for that, and I'll guarantee it's not real-world.


    Toyota isn't sincere about EVs, nor tightening lug nuts.

    • Joe65688619 Joe65688619 on May 19, 2024

      They've been very pragmatic though, not launching platforms where the underlying tech is not ready. If they can offer 500+ range with 20 min charge I would look at one. There's so much expensive wasted battery capacity in the current EVs which typically aren't driven that far between recharging. Toyota was very smart to stay focused on hybrids and build a vertical supply chain to focus their RND investments on offering an improved product rather than sell something similar to what is already out there.


  • Redapple2 I turned off indy after the 7 th yellow (and 2nd or was it the 3rd time they couldnt make it 2 laps laps more before another crash (it was like a demolition derby)). I wanted to tune in the last 20 laps my remote got confiscated. Monaco> why does that Princess look so spaced out all the time?
  • Redapple2 Modern faux retro styling? I m beginning to HATE it. Was the PT Cruiser the first - 20 some years ago. Next, my new Land Rover in 2006 was in the shop 3x in the first year. Almost came to blows with the service manager when they wouldnt admit to a defect and wanted me to pay $1200 on something. (an 8 month old car mind you). 3- what s with the smaller square tail lights next to the bigger square tail lights? Cheap gimmicky styling flair? I truly cant stand Land Rovers any more. I ll buy a Yukon Denali from evil gm Vampire before I buy one of these.
  • 2ACL If you're going to put $13k into a tired Astro van, either finish restoring it, drive it back into the ground, or accept that you're going to take a bath to part ways. As is, this looks like a crusher fugitive and sounds as if itdrives like one, too.
  • Tassos go for it, Tim.. what an effing MASOCHIST....
  • Tassos I love the styling of all LAND ROVERS, which include both this "defender" and the "range Rovers", and I could care less if they are separate subbrands or whatever, they are all LAND ROVERS.Their styling is so iconic, even the half a million bucks Rolls Royce Cullinan looks bad by comparison. they are the ONLY really GOOD LOOKING SUVS IMHO.The above makes it a MONUMENTAL PITY that these beautiful vehicles have SUCH ATROCIOUS, not just VW ATROCIOUS, but Maserati and Alfa ATROCIOUS, Reliability.Pity!
Next