Cybertruck Struggles With Light Off-Roading in New Video

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

We’re just a few weeks away from the four-year anniversary of the Tesla Cybertruck reveal event. The announcement understandably made huge waves in the auto industry and everywhere else, honestly, but that excitement hasn’t survived the several-year wait for many people. Videos like this one aren’t helping the truck’s case, either, as it appears to be struggling with a relatively straightforward off-road obstacle.


The short videos show a few Cybertrucks off-roading in sand and loose dirt. While the terrain has some steep hills and challenging obstacles, we’re not talking about a Moab-level trail here. The truck spins its wheels and has trouble getting traction but ultimately makes it up the hill.


To be fair, this could just be an issue of the wrong tires or an inexperienced driver, but appearances matter, and this appearance isn’t doing Tesla any favors. The automaker set November 30 as the Cybertruck’s initial delivery date, but it’s worth noting that Tesla hasn’t even disclosed pricing for the truck yet, now just a few weeks away from its arrival.


When it does land, the Cybertruck will have stiff competition from legacy automakers and upstarts like Rivian. That said, the truck likely won’t be a volume model for Tesla, instead focusing on diehard fans and super EV nerds. The design alone is enough to narrow the truck’s target audience significantly, but there are also questions about its utility and ability to do every day “truck stuff.” But, unless something else goes sideways – and there’s plenty of time for that to happen – we don’t have long to wait for answers to the Cybertruck questions.


[Image: @stretch_thecj2l on Instagram]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 77 comments
  • El scotto El scotto on Nov 05, 2023

    Oh, the US Government designed built and paid for an EV truck. Too bad it's still on the moon.

  • Bkojote Bkojote on Nov 06, 2023

    I thought with four motors the R1T was going to absolutely obliterate everything with an ICE off road, but with 7,000 pounds of weight it's not so easy. I'd wager partially too their traction logic doesn't seem to be there yet, but maybe an OTA will give it better capabilities.

  • 2ACL If you're going to sink $13k into a tired Astro van, either finish the build or accept a very cold shower to part ways with it. As is, it looks like a crusher fugitive and sounds as if it drives like one, too.
  • Tassos go for it, Tim.. what an effing MASOCHIST....
  • Tassos I love the styling of all LAND ROVERS, which include both this "defender" and the "range Rovers", and I could care less if they are separate subbrands or whatever, they are all LAND ROVERS.Their styling is so iconic, even the half a million bucks Rolls Royce Cullinan looks bad by comparison. they are the ONLY really GOOD LOOKING SUVS IMHO.The above makes it a MONUMENTAL PITY that these beautiful vehicles have SUCH ATROCIOUS, not just VW ATROCIOUS, but Maserati and Alfa ATROCIOUS, Reliability.Pity!
  • Tassos All of VW's EVS have been DISMAL FAILURES. They utterly lack the awesome performance and range of same priced Teslas, and now they prove to be a worthless POS like EVERY OTHER VW, reliability-wise.In the Competitive US market, the ALMIGHTY CONSUMER has PUNISHED VW AGAIN AND AGAIN for their WORTHLESS, SHODDY PRODUCTS. As with ICEs, same with EVs.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh wut is this ... wut ?
Next