Study Finds Advanced Safety Comes at a Steep Price

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff
Karsten Neglia / Shutterstock.com

As modern vehicles increasingly incorporate Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) for enhanced safety, a crucial aspect often overlooked is the repair cost of these systems after a collision. Research by the American Automobile Association (AAA) highlights that expenses related to ADAS can comprise a significant portion of total repair costs, reaching up to 37.6 percent. This high cost is attributed to the necessity of replacing and recalibrating sensors integral to ADAS functionalities.


Minor damages to components such as front radar sensors or distance sensors can lead to considerable repair costs, with figures reaching around $1,540. Awareness of these costs is important for consumers, emphasizing the need for timely repairs to maintain system efficacy.


The Critical Need for Functional ADAS

Greg Brannon from AAA underscores the importance of functional ADAS. As these systems become more prevalent, understanding the associated repair costs is crucial. Ensuring the proper working condition of these systems is vital for preventing accidents. Thus, consumers should be well-informed about the potential repair costs and the importance of addressing ADAS issues promptly.


Variables Affecting ADAS Repair Expenses

The cost of repairing ADAS varies based on several factors, including vehicle make and model, the type and location of the damaged sensor, and the chosen repair facility. The strategic placement of ADAS sensors around the vehicle – front, sides, and rear – plays a role in the repair complexity.

AAA's study examined various repair scenarios, like front-end collisions and windshield replacements, to deduce the costs involved in fixing these sensors. The study found that radar sensors and cameras damaged in front-end collisions incurred the highest repair costs.


Insights from AAA's Study

AAA's study, focusing on the 2023 models of Ford F-150, Nissan Rogue, and Toyota Camry, revealed:

  • Minor front collision repair averaged $1,540, forming 13.2 percent of the total repair cost.
  • Minor rear collision repair costs averaged $684, about 40.9 percent of a total $1,698 estimate.
  • Windshield replacement involving ADAS components averaged 25.4 percent of the total repair cost, equating to $360.00.


Range of Costs for Individual ADAS Components

The study also outlined the range of costs for specific ADAS components, including:

  • Front radar sensors: $500 to $1,300.
  • Front camera sensors: $600 to $800.
  • Mirror mount, side mirror: $740 to $1,600.
  • Windshield camera sensor: $900 to $1,200.
  • Front or rear ultrasonic sensors: $300 to $1,000.

These costs are additional to the standard bodywork required after a collision.


The Importance of Timely ADAS Repairs

When ADAS components fail, drivers are notified through warning lights or messages. In such instances, it's crucial to seek prompt and skilled repair services.


Methodological Approach

The study evaluated the 2023 models of Ford F-150, Nissan Rogue, and Toyota Camry. Notably, this study differed from AAA's previous evaluation of the 2018 models in terms of standard equipment, labor costs, and methodology. For a comprehensive understanding, readers are encouraged to consult the full report.

This article was co-written using AI and was then heavily edited and optimized by our editorial team.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next